User talk:Shkarter1985
Welcome[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages. You may also want to check out Wikipedia:Merge, for information about merging, renaming and moving pages. The Wikipedia directory is also quite useful. In addition, you might want to add yourself to the new user log; if you made any edits before getting an account, you may wish to assign those to your username.
By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.
Finally, here are some open tasks:
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
Other links for reference: Wikipedia:Wikiquette, image copyright tags, Wikipedia:Merge
Hope to see you around the Wiki! Remember to be Bold! with your edits, and if you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!∞Who?¿? 03:26, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Dead entertainer categories[edit]
Why did I create the dead entertainer categories? Because I find such lists interesting and know many others that agree.
Re Poppin' Fresh Image[edit]
I have removed it because it had no source, and there is a policy here in wikipedia that images with out no source gets deleted after 7 days. I hope that answers your quiestion. Thanks --Jaranda wat's sup 22:40, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Short stub articles[edit]
Hi! Short articles are fine, but many of the ones you're leaving aren't long enough for inclusion. Simply saying "X is a writer for Dark Shadows" and not giving any further history of the person isn't really an article. If you're planning to expand these, please do. Have fun and give a yell on my talk page if you need a hand. - Lucky 6.9 23:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
| Speedy deletion warning | Image:Arrow4logo.JPG has been listed at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant with Image:Arrow4logo.png. |
Image copyright problem with Image:Frid26.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Frid26.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 07:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
I DISAGREE WITH THE STUPID COPYRIGHT POLICY! Why you want to ask that question?
Spencer Karter
I'm sorry about my last post. I've got it at http://www.hollowmoon.net/sites/darknessfalls/images/cast/frid/frid26.jpg it said "can be used without permission" and I saved it on my computer and uploaded it.
Spencer Karter
Category names[edit]
I noticed that you have made a number of categories (Greenvillians, Ashevillians, etc.). The correct naming standard is People from Greenville. CG janitor 05:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- A lot of categories are being renamed this way. A few exceptions are being made, but I think this is a new standard being formed. CG janitor 04:24, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
The Edge of Night[edit]
Go to the "history" tab and read my edit summary as to why I removed it. Mike H. That's hot 00:34, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- A request for comment has been filed by User:Cohesion. See Talk:The Edge of Night for questions and concerns. Mike H. That's hot 20:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:JoelCrothers.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:JoelCrothers.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 20:25, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response. Will you permit the image in {{GFDL-self}}. Else please provide copyright information. Thank you Shyam (T/C) 23:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:KLS68.JPG[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:KLS68.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 22:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Please read above message carefully and put a suitable copyright tag on the image page. Regards, Shyam (T/C) 07:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Database lock[edit]
Hey, didn't you hear? We've decided that Wikipedia is done, to publish Wikipedia 1.0 Of course the databases were locked. Wouldn't want any vandalism creeping in at the last moment. --maru (talk) contribs 05:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
I disagree, this is supposed to be a free encyclopedia???
Spencer Karter
Why did you remove my image of Kathryn Leigh Scott from DS?[edit]
I'm MAD at you for removing my image of KLS from DS??? WTH you remove it???? Why you did it???????????????????????
Spencer Karter
- What image are you referring to? --Carnildo 08:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
That screencap of KLS as Maggie from 1968 DS episode.
Spencer Karter
- I haven't a clue. My bot's handled approximately 47,000 images in the past four and a half months, so without knowing the filename, I can't figure out what image you're referring to. If you don't know the filename, but know what article the image was removed from, I can make a guess as to what image you're talking about. --Carnildo 21:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:KLS68.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:KLS68.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Category:American Television Stations with Logo Galleries[edit]
elements cross-posted
- The category was nominated for, and accepted for, deletion on Wikipedia:Categories for deletion; I had no input into the discussion, and merely carried out the community's will as expressed there.
- Also, please use four tildes in a row ("~~~~") to sign your comments.
- James F. (talk) 13:43, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
I STRONGLY DISAGREE, YOU SHOULD NOT ACCEPTED the category to be deleted, period.
Spencer Karter
"Permission"[edit]
Here you asked another user not to revert your edits without your permssion. Sorry pal, but that's just not cool. Most everyone can edit Wikipedia, and no one requires your permission to change or remove your contributions. I'm sure that you put a lot of work into your edits, and that it hurts to see them removed. But no article here is "your's". Thanks.--Sean Black (talk?)
I STRONGLY DISAGREE with you and I DISAGREE with your comments
Spencer Karter p.s. I do not like my articles to be removed, and this is supposed to be a free wikipedia?
Sean Black,
I apologize for my last comments, but I don't like my articles to be removed.
Spencer Karter
Disagreement[edit]
I noticed that you tend to respond to criticism with "I STRONGLY DISAGREE" in all caps, and that your responses indicate that you have not heeded the advice of your fellow editors. Whether or not you agree with Wikipedia policy, you must abide by it if you wish to continue editing. Please make an effort to work constructively with other editors and to take their advice when it is offered. For starters, consider reading WP:OWN as it is clear from your above comment and recent edits to April 1 that you do not understand the boldface note at the bottom of each edit page: If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it. Isopropyl 05:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Please read my message again. The point I am trying to get across to you is that you should be listening to other users and taking their advice when they give it to you, such as signing your comments with four tildes (
~~~~) as others have told you before. I suggest (again) that you read [{WP:OWN]]. I'm not sure what your complaints about this being a "free" encyclopedia are in reference to; anyone can edit Wikipedia, but everyone must also abide by rules. Isopropyl 06:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)- Please read Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages. Isopropyl 06:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Your Additions to Date Pages[edit]
Hey Shkarter1985 - I notice that you've been editing date pages to add dates of television program premieres and that sort of thing to the Events sections. Many Wikipedians who actively work on Wikipedia:WikiProject Days of the year have discussed making some guidelines for what should be listed in Events and what should not, and our proposal can be found here: Wikipedia:Notability on a global scale over time. As you will find if you read the proposal, dates of television show premieres and other entertainment events may not be notable if they were not significant firsts globally and/or did not have a significant impact on a global scale. We will be going through the date pages soon and removing items that are not notable according to this criteria. Please be aware that some of your additions may be removed - I hope you will be understanding in this process. I notice on your edits you write "My info I added should not be removed" - by submitting any edits to Wikipedia, you are putting them up for deletion and merciless modification. One editor alone doesn't make a great encyclopedia - the value in Wikipedia rests in the fact that editors collaborate to make educational and interesting works. If you have any comments, please reply on my talk page. Fabricationary 06:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that. Per the fact that Wikipedia is not a fansite for WSPA, this section can be counted as listcruft, and I believe other editors can agree with this fact. Remember, you do not "own" these articles, as I have seen evidence of this on the other messages on this talk page. Please do not "demand" an explanation, as this does not come on as being polite. I'll leave it up this time because you asked, but don't be suprised if someone else removes it. -Whomp 12:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:DanWoodsRaditchDegrassiTNG.JPG[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:DanWoodsRaditchDegrassiTNG.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:42, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
DeGrassi parody[edit]
I stand by my comment that this is probably not a parody of Twinkle Twinkle Little Star, and is not worth noting, but it's far too trivial a point to have an edit war about. --Poetlister 11:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Dark Shadows cast removing[edit]
It was deleted due to a CfD, have you followed the link that was provided in the edit summary? Snowolf(talk)CONCOI - 19:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Hr_A-all-new-KLS-drawing!.jpg listed for deletion[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hr_A-all-new-KLS-drawing!.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Alan Pultz[edit]
Alan Pultz (b. late 1930s, d. 2001) was an American television director. He worked on General Hospital (1979-2000), Dark Shadows, Return To Peyton Place, The Best of Everything, A Flame In The Wind, and ABC's Wide World of Sports. He was nominated for 10 Daytime Emmys and a single DGA Award. His first DE nomination was shared with Marlene Laird and Phil Sogard. Directed Luke Raping Laura —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.105.145 (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ramse Mostoller[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ramse Mostoller, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Notability WP:BIO. I could not find any secondary refs other than this person is a costume designer. See talk.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ariconte (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs[edit]
Hello Shkarter1985! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Sam Hall (writer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Jack Sullivan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Malcolm Marmorstein - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Robert Cobert - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Sybil Weinberger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Terrayne Crawford - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sybil Weinberger[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sybil Weinberger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 21:46, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]
Hi. When you recently edited WMYA-TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC-TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
The article Bob Clark (television reporter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced BLP
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 03:06, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
February 2013[edit]
Hello, I'm Webclient101. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Sam & Cat that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Webclient101talk 06:32, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- I've also reverted the message you added on Orlady's talk page since it was a personal attack as well. Sam & Cat was fully protected because there was an edit war. If you would like to contact me, please feel free to talk to me on my talk page. Cheers, Webclient101talk 06:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Can you understand it's supposed to be a FREE encyclopedia. Protected articles on Wikipedia aren't FREE encyclopedia, it's false advertising...Since it's non-commercial. If Wikipedians had a union, we would go on strike. It's time to put the free back into the free encyclopedia! End of story! >:( Spencer H. Karter (talk) 06:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- So, let me this straight. If there is a disruption going on in a article such as an edit war or a massive vandalism attack. You think articles should still not be protected. I think that is absolutely ridiculous and illogical. If there were not any article protection, Wikipedia would be in utter chaos.
- — Webclient101talk 07:02, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- So, let me this straight. If there is a disruption going on in a article such as an edit war or a massive vandalism attack. You think articles should still not be protected. I think that is absolutely ridiculous and illogical. If there were not any article protection, Wikipedia would be in utter chaos.
Wikipedia is suppose to be the 'Free Encyclopedia' not the unfree, it's false advertising! Spencer H. Karter (talk) 07:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Your are not being charged to use or read the encyclopedia, nor are you being charged to edit the encyclopedia. It is indeed FREE and there is no "false advertising". However, if you feel there is and wish to begin a lawsuit, please feel free to do so. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:50, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia, but if there is disruption in progress, it must be stopped and controlled. Do you understand and agree with this?
- — Webclient101talk 07:08, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 20[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disney Channel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jessie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:24, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Why I was blocked=[edit]
I don't know why I was blocked but I would like to appeal it. Spencer H. Karter (talk) 16:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
April 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Miriam McDonald, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 22:59, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
WCNC-TV[edit]
I have no interest in an edit war, so I fact-tagged your statement about "Open House NYC" rather than removing it again. Please document that "Open House" is a network program rather than a program which airs in localized versions on the NBC-owned stations. The personal insults are completely unnecessary - and by the way, you're factually incorrect. 166.183.209.211 (talk) 12:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- No one is "protecting" the article or making Wikipedia "unfree." I'm asking you to provide a source for a statement which the evidence indicates is factually inaccurate. 166.183.209.211 (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
2014 in American television[edit]
Generally only the most notable of cancellations for long term series should be mentioned in the top section of the article. This cancellation wasn't notable; Nick has a long list of one-season series, and the circumstances weren't that unusual beyond kidvid and entertainment blogs overhyping a general 'grown out of their role' dispute that it needs more than a mention in the regular 'cancelled series' section. As for your assertions I was personally out for you? I didn't even know when it was added, or who, and I have no vendetta against any editor here, nor do I feel like I'm a 'rival' to anyone. If you want to edit here, you have to know that you're working with others, and be WP:CIVIL about it; don't attack me for editing if you don't feel like I was right. Nate • (chatter) 01:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ANI notification[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 23:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Soapboxing[edit]
Hi, I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia. Please stop soapboxing on article talk pages. If you wish to have an article's protection reconsidered, the place to go is WP:RFPP. Posting rants [1][2][3][4] on talk pages isn't constructive, since talk pages are intended to be used to discuss specific improvements to articles, not as a forum for you to blow off steam. These rants also reek of trolling. Your general thoughts on One Direction were also inappropriate, since talk pages are not for general chatter. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Oh, and please stop misusing the minor edit checkbox. This is not a minor edit. This is not a minor edit. Neither are these: [5][6][7]. Examples of minor edits include superficial changes like typographical error fixes, addition of punctuation or subtraction of erroneous punctuation, addition of wikilink brackets, reversion of obvious vandalism, and other uncontroversial changes. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
By reverting this edit, you have restored content that contravenes Wikipedia's WP:BLPPRIVACY policy. Please fix it immediately. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
February 2016[edit]
Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Miriam McDonald, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove specific requests for reliable sources, and do not replace said requests with unsourced WP:BLP content. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
March 2016[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Miriam McDonald, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 00:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Miriam McDonald. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Shkarter1985, I want to stress that this is not a matter of debate. You run the risk of violating a person's privacy when you publish a birthdate or any other personal data in a global encyclopedia. I'm sure you would not like it if your personal data were published without asking you. Similarly, Wikipedia only publishes birthdates if they can be attributed to reliable sources, like an interview, where it is presumed that the subject doesn't object to that information being released to a wide audience. Now that you have a clear explanation, if you violate WP:BLPPRIVACY again at Wikipedia, I, or Yamaguchi, or another admin will block your account to prevent harm to the encyclopedia and to prevent harm to the article's subject. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- I don't know about month or day but this might serve as a cite for birth year:
- McDonald, Miriam (30 May 2005). "Miriam McDonald Exclusive Interview".
Now the whole Degrassi empire if I can call it that, has been around for 25 years, but because I was born in '87, I missed a lot of those years
- McDonald, Miriam (30 May 2005). "Miriam McDonald Exclusive Interview".
- This at least supports that the info about her being born in 1987 is reliable. Any objections to adding it? Another source would have to be found to verify the month/day if she ever mentioned it in an interview though. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 04:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Soapboxing again[edit]
I've mentioned this to you before, but you need to refrain from soapboxing on talk pages as you have done here. If you want to discuss the suitability of IMDb as a reference, you are free to do that, but once you start up with the meandering diatribes about how you want to "MAKE WIKIPEDIA GREAT AGAIN!" you are simply just wasting talk page space. Wikipedia is not a forum for off-topic ramblings. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Shkarter1985. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Terrayne Crawford has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 09:35, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
File:JoelCrothers.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JoelCrothers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. See the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Time and Again (TV program) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Time and Again (TV program) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time and Again (TV program) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Re: Removing Television Controversies on Retransmission Consent three years ago[edit]
The article does not say that retransmission consent is "controversial," just that cable operators don't like it, which isn't the same thing.
Regarding your comment P.S.S. I don't like rival Wikipedians who remove the categories.
, editing Wikipedia isn't a competition. Ideally all editors are here to make the entire project better. Please reconsider your view that you're fighting against other editors. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 16:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that you feel that way about Wikipedia. Perhaps this isn't the best place for pursuing your interests. Trivialist (talk) 18:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
March 2020[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. El_C 22:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Final warning[edit]
I suggest you conduct yourself with greater moderation or you will be blocked from editing. El_C 22:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Henry Kaplan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:BEFORE comes up empty on virtually any sources. The name is fairly common so it's difficult to sift through the other people by the same name, but there's no indication of independent notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 17:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
You can't erase history, how dare you Qwaiiplayer! You're not a real Wikipedian. (talk) Spencer H. Karter (talk) 17:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)