User talk:Sgconlaw/2021–2025 archive
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Total Defence photos
Hello, at present, I am working on revamping the Total Defence page to be up-to-date with Wikipedia standards. I previously saw some photos you had taken of several Total Defence exhibitions. Would you have more photos of ceremonies, student groups, or even SAF/SCDF personnel? Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 09:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Seloloving: can’t help, I’m afraid. I don’t have any other photographs. I think I was only able to take those photos as I happened to be walking past the National Museum where they were having a display. I haven’t been to any other Total Defence events since then. — SGconlaw (talk) 10:48, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- It's alright, thank you! Seloloving (talk) 11:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello there. I have checked the page Non-constituency Member of Parliament and find that the history section is largely unsourced. Since you have worked on the article for GA status, can you add references to the relevant parts of the history section? Otherwise, the page might lost its GA status.
You might need to add Wikipedia:Inline citations if parts of the history section are referencing the books below (basically like {{sfn|Chan|1995|p=32}} for a section referencing that certain page in Chan's book). Like what I had done for Chinatown MRT station and other MRT pages.
Just a friendly notification. The NCMP page is quite comprehensive, and maybe I hope down the road it might be worked further for FA status. Thank you. ZKang123 (talk) 12:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- @ZKang123: the reason is that the “History” section used to be part of the introduction (which summarized information already found elsewhere in the article). For that reason, I don’t see why a separate history section is required. I’d just recombine it with the introduction. — SGconlaw (talk) 13:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)