User talk:Secrecy

Welcome![edit]

Hello Secrecy, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I noticed that you tagged a few of User:Instantnood's userspace pages with {{db}} but didn't provide a reason. I removed those tags, but you can re-add them at any time with a valid reason. Cheers! Wodup 07:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

You almost breached Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 01:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Privacy[edit]

Please do not place the sockpuppet template on an established user's page unless you have some very good evidence that such a placement is correct. Lexicon (talk) 16:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very good evidence that such a placement is correct! Secrecy 16:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I've unblocked you but changing that many articles and trying to speedy delete that many categories with no edit summaries is a sure way to get blocked. Tony suggested discussing your dispute, not just doing an unexplained mass-revert.

Request handled by: —Wknight94 (talk) 03:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Can you please stop vandalizing Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese)? I've looked at your contribution page, and realized that you have been reverting Michael G. Davis's edits. Why are you doing this?--Jerrypp772000 17:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NO DEFENSE FOR SOCKPUPPET— Preceding unsigned comment added by Secrecy (talk • contribs)

How would you know that he's a sockpuppet?--Jerrypp772000 17:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EYEBALLS

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption and repeated edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-Loren 20:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]