User talk:Seamusfleming92

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Pipe058. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dusty Johnson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. pipe058 20:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tommy Tuberville. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Judekkan (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

im jsut a ittle goofbal Seamusfleming92 (talk) 20:25, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
i'll stop tho Seamusfleming92 (talk) 20:26, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at AustinShow, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Knitsey (talk) 23:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks Seamusfleming92 (talk) 01:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Wikipedia invites everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, but one of your recent edits to the page Talk:Elissa Slotkin suggests that you have been recruited to make that edit by someone else, whether it be a friend, family member, coworker, or public figure. Please understand that Wikipedia does not condone such activity; users should act in their individual capacity, rather than editing under the direction or influence of others. Additionally, please ensure that any articles you create abide by the notability guidelines and that you do not make edits to topics in which you have a conflict of interest. Thank you. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 12:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]