User talk:Sdjkl1

November 2015[edit]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sdjkl1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Note[edit]

Hi Sdjkl1. There's a new Arbcom editing restriction that affects you - WP:ARBPIA3: "All anonymous IP editors and accounts with less than 500 edits and 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict." You are currently at 22 edits so please refrain from editing these types of articles until you have more edits in other areas. Thank you. When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 23:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 23:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appeasement[edit]

There is a distinct difference between the international community taking no action concerning the Italian invasion of Ethiopia , and their giving in to the territorial demands of Hitler in the hope of avoiding another war. In retrospect, they are both action which promoted the possibility of another war, but only the latter is "appeasement." I suggest you check a dictionary, or, at the very least, do a little nore reading on the period between the wars in Europe. In any event, your categorization is not supported by a reliable source, and if you add it again without such a source, it will be removed again. BMK (talk) 10:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Britain and France appeased Italy until 1940. Mussolini invading Ethiopia was no different than Hitler invading the Sudetenland. (Sdjkl1 (talk) 13:34, 27 November 2015 (UTC))[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Welcome. I'm assuming you are new here. You might benefit from reading WP:3RR, WP:Edit warring and WP:BRD, if you haven't already. This could avoid future problems. Good luck. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]