User talk:Sanjaynegi2023

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sanjaynegi2023, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Sanjaynegi2023, good luck, and have fun. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Akash Kumbhar moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Akash Kumbhar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I noticed that you recently removed content from Shank (2009 film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello i removed a Link because Link has been not accessible on wikipedia Sanjaynegi2023 (talk) 19:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akash Kumbhar (February 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akash Kumbhar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

User4edits (talk) 07:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sanjaynegi2023! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! User4edits (talk) 07:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Madhuri Pawar. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:10, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Massage Practitioner, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i was doing some Grammer fix its removed by mistakenly Sanjaynegi2023 (talk) 06:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Madhuri Pawar in red.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Madhuri Pawar in red.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.instagram.com/p/C05hSmDiUCk/?hl=en&img_index=1 and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Sanjaynegi2023. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Madhuri Pawar, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i understand thank you Sanjaynegi2023 (talk) 09:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But i don't have any direct connection with madhuri pawar Sanjaynegi2023 (talk) 09:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjaynegi2023: Would you mind explaining where you got her image from? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i got this image from instagram. But i don't know about i can't use social media image on wikipedia but that's not mean i have directly connection with that's person Sanjaynegi2023 (talk) 09:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How did you manage to get the image with a file size above 2.8MB from Instagram? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am using inhance tool for getting better picture quality of blurry picture Sanjaynegi2023 (talk) 11:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for answering Jeraxmoira's question about this. However, perhaps you can clarify things a little. (1) The image which you uploaded does not contain any of the artefacts which are introduced by software processing to make blurred photographs appear clearer. And to be totally clear about this, I don't just mean that the artefacts are at a lower level than might be expected: I mean there aren't any at all. I have examined the image at a magnification much larger than would have been necessary to show them. (2) Can you please give the URL of the image from Instagram which you copied? I have found a copy of the same picture at a much lower resolution (by which I mean a lower native pixel resolution, not just a lower overall image size) but the one you uploaded is clearly not derived from that one, as it includes a considerable amount of detail not contained in the Instagram version, such as individual eyelashes. Obviously image enhancement to improve blurry pictures can't add details not present in the original. I should be very interested indeed to see the original picture on Instagram which you copied. Or have you by some strange change managed to lose the URL to it, and forgotten where on Instagram you obtained it? (3) Why did you say, when you uploaded the image, that you were its copyright holder? (4) Why did you need to use image processing "for getting better picture quality of blurry picture", since careful examination of the image makes it abundantly clear that it is not derived from a blurry picture?

I look forward to reading your responses to all of those points. Alternatively, you may find it quicker and easier to instead just answer the following one question: Where did you get the image? JBW (talk) 17:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar[edit]

Can you please stop trying to correct grammar (or as you call it, trying to "fix" grammar)? In every case that I have seen you have done one or both of replacing perfectly correct English grammar with an incorrect attempt at English, and/or significantly changing the meaning of a sentence due to evidently having misunderstood it. JBW (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]