User talk:Sandipan1997

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Sandipan1997, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 09:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Organic Soap (May 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sandipan1997! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please tell me why all my edits are reverted though there were claims for that?
---- Sandipan1997 (talk) 10:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Generally you should ask whoever did the reverts - but in this case it is probably because you appear to be trying to promote soulflower.in and using inline External links. KylieTastic (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pritam Nirala, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Wipro. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:35, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I
added the link just because it was referring to the Soulflower brand rather than the Soulflower band. To reduce the redundancy, I added that to an external link just to refer to which brand or thing the citation was referring to. Sandipan1997 (talk) 10:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Sandipan1997, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sandipan1997|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. This is regarding anything to do with Soulflower, under any name and in any namespace. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have disclosed it in my talk page before that I have no relation with the subject. But I do not understand why it is being deleted repeatedly 2409:40C0:107D:FEB6:F8EE:647A:B1C8:BC69 (talk) 11:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have no connection with the brand and am not a paid for that.there are also some articles published by me like the "Bombay Chamber of Commerce and industry". But I believe I am wrongly given speedy deletion each time.I tried each time to improve my article but do not get any response and my post gets deleted. Sandipan1997 (talk) 11:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your drafts get deleted because they are promotional, with no evidence that the subject is notable.
You say you have disclosed something – what have you disclosed, and where?
AGF notwithstanding, it is difficult to believe that you have no connection with the Soulflower business, sine you constantly keep recreating it under different names. You must have some special interest why you insist on publishing this? Alone the fact that it has been repeatedly turned down and deleted would surely make a disinterested editor turn to other matters. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am not connected to the subject and am publishing it here. How can I disclose more? Sandipan1997 (talk) 11:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bombay Chamber of Commerce and Industry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://bombaychamber.com/about-us/overview/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 11:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Sandipan1997! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:36, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Sandipan1997. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. This is regarding Soulflower. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 00:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Given that after three earlier declines for lack of notability there has been no attempt to improve the sourcing, I can only assume that no sources could be found to satisfy WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT, and that the subject is therefore inherently non-notable.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion nomination of "Soulflower"[edit]

Soulflower, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. DarkAudit (talk) 09:36, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I am an individual creator and am not related to Soulflower. Can you please mention the parts where you think there is some promotional material.
Thanks and regards
Sandipan Sandipan1997 (talk) 09:43, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Soulflower brand for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soulflower brand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soulflower brand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 12:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Sandipan1997. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bombay Chamber of Commerce and Industry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sandipan1997. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bombay Chamber of Commerce and Industry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]