User talk:Ruisleipa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ruisleipa, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Wirepas Connectivity Suite, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Wirepas Connectivity Suite, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb thank you for your message. I have already contested the speedy deletion nomination as the article is written from a neutral perspective, uses independent sources, and contains no subjective prose. It is no different in substance from other Wikipedia articles that are currently live, an example of which was mentioned in my contest notice. The subject's notably is also justified through the use of independent research sources. If you can provide exact examples of what is considered promotional I will of course be happy to amend the text. Ruisleipa (talk) 12:37, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just for a start, there are multiple external links within the article text, which is clear evidence of an intention to promote the company. Deb (talk) 13:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Deb do I understand correctly then that I cannot edit the page but have to completely resubmit it? And that removing the "external links" (are you referring to the links to the Wirepas page, not the research sources? Why are these considered "clear evidence" of an intention to promote the company? And, for that matter, I cannot see any mention of intention having anything to do with suitability on the Wiki information pages) will be enough to ensure it is not deleted again? Ruisleipa (talk) 17:59, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I checked out the other article that you suggested was similar to the one you wrote and there is really no comparison. The Z-Wave article is about a well-known communications protocol. The referencing is extensive and almost all from reliable independent sources, whereas yours almost all originates from Wirepas. Take these out and you'll have nothing much left. The Z-Wave article has existed since 2005 and has been built up, refined and edited by many contributors who don't have any interest in promoting Z-Wave. Yes, there are one or two places where the wording could be improved. However, there are dozens of previous versions we could go back to if we think they are better - we don't have that option with yours.
Saying "I don't understand, please spell it out to me" is a delaying tactic sometimes practised by newcomers. It doesn't work. Please just understand that, if you create a new article and it reads like an advert, it will be deleted. You need to set your conflict of interest aside and try to write it as if you weren't being paid to give a good impression of the company you're working for. Deb (talk) 18:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Deb for your reply. I m not trying a delaying tactic, I genuinely thought the article would be suitable. But it's OK, I will have to rewrite it. Since it seems the draft has been removed, can you kindly confirm I need to rewrite and submit it again rather than being able to edit it online? Ruisleipa (talk) 09:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Deb, I am starting to rewrite this previously discussed article. I'm just letting you know as a courtesy since on the create page it suggests I contact you as the person who deleted the previous version. Kind regards, Nick. Ruisleipa (talk) 08:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple drafts[edit]

Hi, I was going to move your sandbox draft User:Ruisleipa/sandbox to the draft space, but the title is already taken up by Draft:Wirepas Connectivity Suite. If you don't need the latter, can you please either blank it or place the {{db-author}} (see WP:G7) tag on it so it can be deleted. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We will consider the alternate version, suffixed "2" 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:17, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, many thanks for your feedback, I will edit the article. Cheers, Nick Ruisleipa (talk) 11:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I have edited the article to remove inline references, change the researchgate reference, etc. I am happy now to resubmit it, the only question I have is about the comment that the article is not written in an encyclopaedic style. I have read the wiki instructions on style and am having trouble understanding how the article I wrote is unsatisfactory. Would there be any chance of you providing me with some more comments, or shall I just resubmit the draft?
Thanks a lot for your help. Ruisleipa (talk) 09:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you have not already done so please resubmit for review. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:04, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ruisleipa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Wirepas Connectivity Suite, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 16:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wirepas Connectivity Suite (November 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Deb (talk) 12:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wirepas Connectivity Suite (November 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Ruisleipa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wirepas Connectivity Suite, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]