User talk:Rudyon

DRN Light on Dark[edit]

Hey, You did ask for some guidence, and I didn't see that any was provided. If you are not getting responses on the article talk page, and it looks like you are not- you have two options. The first- is to be bold and make the change you think should be made, and see if anyone reverts / disagrees with you. That could lead to discussion on the talk page. The second option is to ask for a 3rd Opinion. This process will bring a fresh pair of eyes to the page and let them decide. Personally- I would recomend the 3rd opinion- safest to get another perspective I'd say! Good Luck!! If you have any other questions, please feel free to visit the WP:TEAHOUSE they are a wealth of knowledge and are best equiped to give direction and guidence. Those of us who volunteer over at the DRN do try to be nice, but we are also..... less.... friendly? I don't know... we're just not as good with editors who need direction like the teahouse. Nightenbelle (talk) 16:17, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me that the tea house exists. @Eggishorn responded here 2 days ago. They removed the dispute with this edit. Rudyon (talk) 07:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Argent (August 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Argent and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 08:29, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rudyon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 08:29, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Argent Labs has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Argent Labs. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:45, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]