User talk:Rsteen (usurped)

Speedy deletion of Riley steen

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ale_Jrb^talk 17:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Trevor McWaters

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Paste (talk) 18:59, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Under new Management

Please be informed that this user page has now been taken over by Danish user Rsteen as part of a unified login. The former occupant of this page does not appear to have contributed anything useful. Rsteen (talk) 06:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

JSTOR cleanup drive

Hello TWL users! We hope JSTOR has been a useful resource for your work. We're organizing a cleanup drive to correct dead links to JSTOR articles – these require JSTOR access and cannot easily be corrected by bot. We'd love for you to jump in and help out!

See the list

Sent of behalf of Nikkimaria for The Wikipedia Library's JSTOR using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

TWL Questia check-in

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
• When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! 20:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rsteen (usurped). Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rsteen (usurped). Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Contents

Contents is the top level of the Wikipedia category hierarchy, but it's also a container category, and a maintenance category. This obviously leads to a circular reference. But I'm new here, and don't have permission to edit, what do I do? Udihgi (talk) 04:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

J. I. Thornycroft

Thanks for thanking me for the edit I made to this article. Just to let you know, I do have a complete copy of the unpublished Thornycroft List (its compiler and editor, the late David Lyon, was a good friend) so I can clarify anything about early Thornycroft construction if you are interested. Rif Winfield (talk) 07:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Rif Winfield. Sorry for taking so long to answer. It would be very nice to have a more precise list of early Thornycroft production, given that the sources available when the article was written could not give a fitting overview of the boats involved. So yes, the interest is there. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 18:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks. Do you wish me to send you a full list of the early vessels (both at Chiswick and at Southampton) so you can edit the article? Regards, Rif Rif Winfield (talk) 12:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi again Rif Winfield. I would be very happy to receive a copy of the full list, so the information on Wikipedia can be more complete. Have seen a list of publications by Mr. David Lyon, and he appears to have been quite an authority on the subject. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 02:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The printed list is not digital, so I shall have to send it to you in parts. I have made a few additions to the first 27 vessels (#1 to #27) but note that the two vessels named Firefly were not similar, and I suggest that for clarity you separate these entries and place them in better chronological order; #14 was the larger vessel of either 48ft or 53ft (I'm inclined to accept the figures given in Engineering). This design was apparently quite successful as it was offered to at least seven customers between 1884 and 1888. The second Firefly (#19) was smaller, reported as 30ft length; this is the vessel sold to Russia (a private purchaser named E. Karavodin) by 1890 and renamed Strela. #20 was similar to #19, and #21 may have been similar but this is unconfirmed; neither has a name recorded.

You will note that I have added a hash sign (#) before each of these early yard numbers, and I suggest that for clarity you do the same for all the other vessels. The yard number indicated the chronological sequence in which vessels were contracted to be built, and I suggest that this is a better sequence in which to list the vessels than simply in order of rough "completion years", which are themselves imprecise.

All vessels up to #378 were built at Chiswick. Of the next 80 vessels (#379 to #458) some were built at Chiswick and some at Woolston (Southampton), and it is not clear in every case which yard was the builder because Thornycroft used the same series of yard numbers for both locations, but I will try to clarify this for you. From #459 onwards all vessels were built at Woolston. The decision to buy the (existing) shipyard at Woolston (from Mordey, Carney & Co) was taken on 20 June 1904; the old yard at Church Wharf, Chiswick was closed in August 1909. Rif Winfield (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

So pleased to cooperate with you on this list, Rif Winfield. Are you going to scan some pages and then email them? That would be fine. Your suggestion of using hash numbers instead of completion year as sort order seems reasonable. Cheers Rsteen (talk) 18:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

I don't have access to a scanner at present, so will have to do this the hard way. The Thornycroft list contains far too much data on each vessel to go into the Wikipedia article (e.g. on trials data and modifications to the design), so I shall edit what I send you. As you suggest, we'll transfer this exchange to email. My email address is [email protected] so please email me with your email address (and real name) so I can start to relay data, which will be split over a length of time to give you time to carry out the edit. Meanwhile you can start moving some entries from the Chiswick article to the equivalent Woolston article; note this includes the LCC passenger ferries #385-#394 and Torpedo boats TB.19, TB.20, TB.31 and TB.32, which were definitely all built at Woolston, whereas the first five Torpedo boats of the Gadfly design (#415-#419) were built at Chiswick. Note that your New Zealand source seems to have quite a lot of errors in this regard. Rif Winfield (talk) 07:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi again Rif Winfield. Have sent email to you and hope to continue the conversation in that way. Cheers Rsteen (talk) 09:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Imago Museum

Hello, Rsteen (usurped),

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Imago Museum for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 12:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: Hi John B123. Thanks for this message. The deletion took place while I was busy translating the Italian article to English - should probably have done that in the sandbox first. Now the article is up and running again. Cheers Rsteen (talk) 04:44, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Rsteen, the article looks fine now so I've marked it as reviewed. As an alternative to the sandbox, you can add {{in creation}} to the top of the new page whilst getting it started. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)