User talk:Rostdo

Talk:Gospel music[edit]

Hello, Rostodo:

I just read your comment on the history of "gospel" songs, and revised the article. Check it and see if you think it is good. Richard E. Davies (talk) 02:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Richard E. Davies[reply]

 Richard, Thanks - your change is a welcomed improvement.   Found titles using "Gospel Songs" (or Hymns) were actually

 published first in England after P. Phillips and others had introduced the genre.   Bliss likely picked it up from Moody's

 team after their early UK visits.   E.S. Lorenz provides a great summary of the history in his Church Music (p. 342)

 which is available on line at: http://www.archive.org/details/MN41689ucmf_1. Rostdo (talk) 16:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

+++++

Of course, the genre was being developed throughout the 19th Century, but it never got a "name" until the 1870s. The problem is that there are a lot of people, including some who had earlier contributed to the "Gospel music" wikipedia article, who presume that "gospel music" is whatever they buy today in the store or hear at church. The confusion of terms often causes us to talk past one another.

Thanks for your scholarship. Richard E. Davies (talk) 15:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Richard E. Davies[reply]

response on vcard vevent problem[edit]

FYI- User_talk:J_JMesserly#vcard_context_problems_with_.28marriage.29_event_within_infobox_person. Sorry for the delayed response. J JMesserly (talk) 18:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation - Cowboy creation[edit]

Howdy, you are cordially invited to give your input at the photo shop

Enjoy your day! --Scott Free (talk) 21:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EOE TS 1887.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EOE TS 1887.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 12:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rostdo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:EOExcell TS1887.jpg[edit]

The file File:EOExcell TS1887.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fritchle near wooster.png[edit]

The file File:Fritchle near wooster.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]