User talk:RoddemanDennis

I think the topic is notable because the program is used at many universities & companies around the world.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, RoddemanDennis, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tochnog professional, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fram (talk) 08:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RoddemanDennis, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi RoddemanDennis Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

--Devokewater (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tochnog professional[edit]

The article Tochnog professional has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability could be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tochnog professional for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tochnog professional is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tochnog professional until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 08:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

There is a conflict of interest with you're edits, you seem to own the product. --Devokewater (talk) 18:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I declared the COI. Another user moved it to the talk page (see the history). Please discuss with him where you want the COI.

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, RoddemanDennis. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Tochnog professional, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyo'ne or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I really did state the COI. See the history. Someone moved it to the talk page. I have put it back now in the original article. Hope it stays there.

The article does not do 'editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyo'ne or anything'. It is just a factual description of a numerical program (just like already existing wikipedia articles on such FE programs).

RoddemanDennis It should be in talk page only and NOT in the article. ~ Amkgp 💬 19:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. ~ Amkgp 💬 19:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RoddemanDennis. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Tochnog professional, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:RoddemanDennis. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=RoddemanDennis|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~ Amkgp 💬 19:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not receive compensation or expect to receive compensation for my edits. RoddemanDennis (talk) 19:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RoddemanDennis do you own the business? Devokewater (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The program is available for free. But yes, I develop it. RoddemanDennis (talk) 19:24, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Tochnog professional. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]