User talk:RobertGraves

Welcome![edit]

Hello, RobertGraves, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Tibor Szamuely (historian). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 04:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, RobertGraves. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operação Prato, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page São Luís (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operação Prato, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page São Luís (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm MrBill3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jacques Vallée, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Discussion also posted at Fringe Theories Noticeboard here. MrBill3 (talk) 16:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theanine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sainsbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 19:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]