User talk:RkOLOGUY

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, RkOLOGUY! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 21:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Tamzin. These links are helpful. I am still learning the ropes. RkOLOGUY (talk) 21:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"CA-SCR-177: Oldest Human Settlement in Scotts Valley, Central California" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect CA-SCR-177: Oldest Human Settlement in Scotts Valley, Central California. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 4#CA-SCR-177: Oldest Human Settlement in Scotts Valley, Central California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Please note, this refers only to the redirect created after your article was moved. Your article has not beeen nominated for deletion, and looks like a darn good article at that! -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 21:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tamzin -- I am drafting an entry on the volunteer excavation that happened at the CA-SCR-177 site and I am worried about how to title it correctly so we don't run into the same problem that happened with the entry on the site itself. I am unclear about titling conventions. Right now the entry is titled: "Volunteer Archaeological Excavation in Scotts Valley, Ca 1983." As with the CA-SCr-177 entry I'm not sure if anyone will look it up that way or if there is a better way to title it. Would you have some advice about this to offer? The entry itself is short, backed by citations and is meant to link /supplement the CA-SCR-117 entry. Thank you for any advice you may have, RkOLOGUY (talk) 22:43, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Big Dig (archaelogy) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Big Dig (archaelogy). Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 02:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Gusfriend. I am adding more recent citations. Also more wikilinks and editing it down a bit for concision. Once this is done do I resubmit it? What is the appropreate next step? Thanks again, RkOLOGUY (talk) 18:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Big Dig (archaelogy) (November 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For this topic to be standalone notable you'd need references that support the dig itself, ie, the event on Memorial Day weekend, meets notability guidelines. I don't think that's likely to be possible (the coverage won't be "sustained"), and much of this content duplicates what is already at CA-SCR-177. I recommend expanding that article instead where necessary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Big Dig (archaelogy) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 16:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RkOLOGUY! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 16:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Big Dig (archaelogy)[edit]

Hello, RkOLOGUY. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Big Dig".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, History of California before 1900, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr.weedle (talk) 00:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]