User talk:Regulov
Welcome[edit]
Welcome!
Hello, Regulov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
RJFJR (talk) 21:20, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Regulov,
I notice that you recently replaced (and then reverted) the simplified character for "ki" in this article with the classical version. I'm just curious as to why you reverted your edits - did you find something in the style guidelines which encourages the use of simplified characters? I only ask because I've often thought of making the exact changes you did, since the simplified character is hardly ever used in the aikido community. If you've found a good reason not to use the older version of ki, I'd appreciate it if you could let me know - just in case I'm ever tempted to change the character myself!
Cheers, Yunshui (talk) 12:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- I agree: in my experience, the word is usually written the old way, so the simpler form is jarring; I just didn't want to get into a thing. When, in the course of actually reading the page, I noted that a justification/explanation was implied in the Ki section by the link to Tōyō kanji, I decided not to get involved in something that seemed to have seen a bit of contention between people better informed than I am. The traditional form is apparently deprecated in modern Japanese; my own (very limited) language expertise comes from the Chinese side of things.
Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject![edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia from Wikiproject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
- Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
- We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
- Lastly, why not try and strive to create a good article! Anatomical articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
Feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! --LT910001 (talk) 21:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Double spaces[edit]
There's no need to change double spaces after a period to single spaces, since both render exactly the same way on the finished page, as a single space. BMK (talk) 21:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
TdF[edit]
Hello! The guy writing the text is an IP, let's not be too severe in the edit summaries correcting him, or we may wind up with no one writing. 
Mattsnow81 (Talk) 13:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Edit Summary[edit]
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Aircraft carrier does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! - theWOLFchild 14:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Only 17 of your last 250 edits are accompanied by summaries. However, I also noticed that many of them appear to be relatively minor in nature, such as fixing commas and dashes. With those types of edits, you can check "minor" to indicate the edit as such. Otherwise, please explain your edits. Thank you - theWOLFchild 14:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Regulov. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Wasn't my comma, but I know good prose when I see it[edit]
I apologize if I was too blunt. I did not write that section of the article, but I know good prose when I see it. The comma in that location maintains the vigorous pacing of the narrative as well as consistency with the rest of that article. The alternative would be to rewrite the entire article from scratch in the more concise American prose style: shorter sentences and simpler clause structure (i.e., less chaining of multiple dependent clauses). I think that might be the better alternative, but I'm not crazy enough about Magna Carta to do the heavy lifting myself. Plus that would irritate all the editors from England who would argue for sticking with British English. In general, it's more coherent to maintain an article in one style, then to delete punctuation willy-nilly and create a Frankenstein of an article which conveys a schizophrenic impression to readers. --Coolcaesar (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Regulov. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 31[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Castration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyclopes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Regulov. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject![edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).
We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:
- Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
- The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.
Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! Spyder212 (talk) 05:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Preview – Consolidate – Summarize[edit]
Hello, Regulov, and thanks for your contributions. Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:
- Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
- The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
- Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).
Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric talk 14:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Alabama isn't in parentheses[edit]
Uh, what? Decatur, Alabama is its own unit - "Decatur in Alabama". Saying "Decatur in Alabama, and Harlingen in Texas" would not be grammatically correct. 5Ept5xW (talk) 05:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nvm, article's better off with more clarity. The major ULA factory is in Decatur. Thanks, 5Ept5xW (talk) 05:10, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
You are mistaken, 5Ept5xW, and I encourage you, again, to go and read the MOS. "Parenthetical" does not mean "in parentheses", and "Decatur, Alabama" is not in fact "its own unit".
"Decatur, Alabama is a lovely town." INCORRECT "Decatur, Alabama, is a lovely town." CORRECT
I understand that it looks wrong to you; but it is not wrong. Don't "Nvm" me: I do not object to your edit, but I do object a little to the tone of "agree to disagree" with which you are closing the issue. You are just saving face. Next time you come across a correction of this kind (see also: "On July 20, 1969, Apollo 11 landed on the moon."), I hope you will refrain from reverting it, recalling that your intuition is not reliable in such cases.
Regulov (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, thanks for your opinion, although I do not understand your aggressive response. 5Ept5xW (talk) 05:27, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
It isn't my opinion. That's why I'm taking this tone with you. You are trying to preserve your mistaken understanding of how to use a comma, and your ego, by calling it my opinion. Don't do that. Please read the relevant section on commas in the manual of style. I am trying to teach you something. In this case, you know less than I do. Regulov (talk) 05:33, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Regulov: Ok, this is from eight days ago. To summarize the current issue, you (Regulov) seem to be offended by my inclusion of pertinent details - ULA's Texas facility is a minor part of the supply chain, Decatur is the main Atlas V assembly facility. The current language in the Atlas V article reflects this, please see discussion at that talk page. 5Ept5xW (talk) 06:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
?? What is from eight days ago? Are you calling from the past?
What an excellent summary of our dispute! I seem to be offended by your inclusion of pertinent details! Actual lol! Is there something wrong with my keyboard? Are my repeated, careful explanations coming out as cuneiform? Let me be clear: almost the last thing I am, is "offended."
Regulov (talk) 07:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
New message from Shearonink[edit]
Message added 17:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Shearonink (talk) 17:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Portsmouth - Meades[edit]
Hi Regulov, Re the possessive S after Jonathan Meades, the MoS appears to be at odds with English grammar here, see, eg, The New Oxford English Grammar, editor Sydney Greenbaum, publisher OUP 1996. Hence my reverting your edit. However in the world of Wikipedia, MoS rules, so apologies. Perhaps the sentence should be reworded. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Possessive Bruno Mars[edit]
Hello
I thought that instead of reverting back and forth we could have a formal discussion here. You do have a point, it does say "For the possessive of singular nouns, including proper names and words ending in s, add 's". However, I previously had this discussion with someone else on Wikipedia and we agreed to change some of the possessive forms whenever it was possible since it is quite difficult to pronounce "Mars's", its harder than "pizza's". I also submit most of the articles to GOCE and they don't seem to have a problem with it, since "If a name ending in s or z would be difficult to pronounce with 's added (Jesus's teachings), consider rewording (the teachings of Jesus)." If possible we make the changes, if not we leave it alone. The MOS is a guideline, not a prison and it is still correct to usage the english language.
Regards, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 08:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
salvaged for my own records[edit]
Slow down.[edit]
Mario, you are having a tantrum. Take a time out.
As I write this, you are eliminating each and every instance of "Mars's" on Bruno Mars by recasting the sentence. Stop and count to ten.
Some of your rewrites are fine; some are even improvements. But you just can't get them all without accepting bafflingly bad writing, and because you are doing it in haste and in anger, you are also making spelling mistakes as you go.
What purpose does this serve? Regulov (talk) 16:26, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Regulov Well, there goes the improvement with you reverting everything! MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
That's not fair, Mario. I have only changed a few back to "Mars's". I think you have gone way overboard, but I have left most of your rephrased sentences alone. Go ahead and count. And when I said some were improvements, I obviously didn't mean "the mother of Mars". Regulov (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
I give up, you win. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:10, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- That isn't how I'd put it; but okay. Regulov (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Have you given up on the three articles we are talking about? We were about to reach a consensus on Locked Out of Heaven. Cheers, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please get an arbitrator[edit]
Regulov Nor can you do whatever you want. British style REALLY does not use the full stop, their name for the period, the same way Americans use them. Read some British publications and notice the differences. You are now edit-warring, in my view. The editors who work on articles about novels by Dickens work hard at them, and work out differences on substance and style. You are not listening. Please do listen and get educated. None of us are new to Wikipedia, nor new to British style. - - Prairieplant (talk)|
It's not always that simple ...[edit]
.. per MOS:'S; "If a name ending in s or z would be difficult to pronounce with 's added (Jesus's teachings), consider rewording (the teachings of Jesus)." - Alison ❤ 18:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
I have read it. It is always that simple. At Wikipedia, we write "Jesus's" and "Laurene Powell Jobs's". The end. Regulov (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- If it were 'always that simple', we wouldn't have MOS battles off-wiki, such as what happened with the AP MOS some time back. Not all our editors know this, so try to be less snippy and bite-y with editors, lest you drive them away with your frankly caustic attitude. That was my take-away from this exchange - Alison ❤ 20:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- Excuse me? If you had checked the MOS before reverting, I wouldn't have had to direct you to it. Now you are here, on my talk page, pasting the passage I sent you to, as though I didn't know it by heart, and tut-tutting my "attitude" on behalf of the purely hypothetical editors I am driving away. Learn to accept correction gracefully. Regulov (talk) 13:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
RFC on Claire Danes[edit]
You have previously contributed to Claire Danes. I have opened an RFC on some of the content and would appreciate your input. Talk:Claire Danes#RFC - Claire Danes persona non grata resolution SquareInARoundHole (talk) 19:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| For being bold and correcting a long-standing WP:BLP issue on Claire Danes! SquareInARoundHole (talk) 06:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC) |
BLP DS[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
TolWol56 (talk) 10:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
No BLP is violated and you have been told, so don't use misleading edit summaries like here. TolWol56 (talk) 10:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ooh, scary. Puts me in mind of one of those lizards with the neck frill. I am not impressed. Regulov (talk) 13:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
How to ping other users[edit]
It looks like you attempted to ping me here [1]. That did not work, because you must a pipe "|" not a ":". The correct markup would look like, {{u|Geogene}}. Geogene (talk) 19:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, Geogene! Thanks for the gracious help! If you click the link that says View History at the top of that page, you will see a list of recent edits, showing that I corrected the typo myself, two minutes after I left my comment and two hours before you rode to the rescue. My hero. Regulov (talk) 10:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- You can't "fix" a ping template this way [2], because it only registers when you sign a post in the same edit. You have to either get them right the first time, or delete the old time stamp and re-sign. I see I'm not the first person to notice that you don't take correction very well. I believe I'll also point out that you're being weirdly aggressive here and at Talk:Rock balancing. If you're going to personalize disputes immediately, like you did here [3], then you yourself might want to do a better job of taking a few deep breaths first. This later diff too [4]. I'm afraid that I will insist on NPOV and no original research on that page. Geogene (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
June 2022[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You are aware that you are engaging in disruptive edit warring against consensus and are disturbing a stable version. TolWol56 (talk) 11:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TolWol56 (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. See the report here. GenuineArt (talk) 15:33, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring at Claire Danes[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The full report is the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 00:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Let's wait for a closer to review. I don't think it is worth either of us wasting time or energy until a third party reviews the RfC and makes a decision. Whatever happens, don't get blocked again for edit warring!! Not worth it and while I disagree with the commentary of the blocking admin on BLP, it's true that it does not rise to the level of unsourced defamation. Slywriter (talk) 19:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Jesus on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 Laguna Woods shooting on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Average human height by country on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:MicroG on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Zaporizhzhia Oblast on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Republics of Russia on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tudor Dixon on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shabbat on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Torture in Ukraine on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hunter Biden laptop controversy on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:In My Time of Dying on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Alfred Kinsey on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Wilderness therapy on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Elizabeth II on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Your Recent Reversion of my Edit to the Sam Harris Article and MOS:'S[edit]
Well, I am gobsmacked.
That is not what I learned in school about half a century ago. But, apparently, that is acceptable grammar now. Thanks for the lesson.
04:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC) 2600:1700:B550:B918:25B5:B782:80C2:D299 (talk) 04:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gene Kelly on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Baháʼí Faith on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Baháʼí Faith on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Serbia on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Trailing assortment[edit]
Hi Regulov! First, let me apologize for this revert; I don’t like how the sentence stands now, but my initial reasoning clearly missed the mark because I do agree that your position is, strictly speaking, correct. I suspect that if the phrase had been ‘a host of wanderers’ (or something similar), I would have unambiguously identified the noun the verb was associated with, but since ‘an assortment’ is not really something that can ‘trail’, I subconsciously took ‘an assortment of’ to be a colloquial synonym for ‘assorted’, which, even now, I still think is how it’s being used in this context. Regardless, my main takeaway at this point is that ‘an assortment of wanderers’ is terrible phrasing and we should totally replace it! Unfortunately, I have not yet read Blood Meridian, and I honestly have no idea what is being suggested here—notably, I can’t tell if the wanderers are human or something like mononoke, and that might affect word choice. Might you be better positioned to suggest new wording? Cheers —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 11:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- No need for apology. The distinction I am insisting on is eroding in English. I agree that Blood Meridian has some clunky writing. I agree that the construction "an assortment of wanderers trails behind him" is ... not great. You are right that it should be improved. The wanderers are people, but I'd have to dig up the book to recast the sentence. I don't remember. No promises. Regulov (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:32, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Route diagram template on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Operation Windsor on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Killing of Jordan Neely on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Malik Zulu Shabazz on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kylie Minogue on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Terrorism on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:City of Willoughby on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shohei Ohtani on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Dilidor[edit]
Hi Regulov, I was just reading the interesting history of your comma wars with this user. Were you aware that they have been on a "final warning" for comma-related misdeeds since 2018?
And they rejected the warning:
[[5]]
Given they were warned for precisely the issue they were driving you up the wall with, I wouldn't bother interacting with them again. Simply take it to ANI. The ANI ruling was never complied with, further sanctions are necessary.
Anyway, all the best. Boynamedsue (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Self-immolation of Aaron Bushnell on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Paul Atreides on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox election on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tesla, Inc. on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)