User talk:Rager7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rager7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Rager7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mazhar Khan (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rager7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mazhar Khan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, there's already a disambiguation for it. Rager7 (talk) 05:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hi Rager7! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Please be sure to check out the Manual of Style as well. In particular, you have made a lot of edits where you have simply shortened something with a contraction. Per WP:N'T, do not do this. Kimen8 (talk) 20:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see I didn't know there was a rule against certain types of contractions. Rager7 (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. Also, another article should only be linked to once (with exceptions); this is also in the manual of style (WP:LINKONCE). Kimen8 (talk) 20:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Got it, there are rules of linking too. Rager7 (talk) 20:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More re linking[edit]

Hello, please don't link to countries or other commonly known words, per the Manual of Style on overlinking, as you did at John Kestel. If you continue to not obey basic Manual of Style rules, you may be blocked. Graham87 (talk) 04:31, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 04:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On further review of your edits, I noticed this one to Bothwell Road Park, where you added a contraction despite being specifically advised against doing so above. We can not have users who are unresponsive to feedback here. I will mass-rollback your edits. Graham87 (talk) 04:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit you made to Charter of Saint Petersburg (probably a very bad translation from Russian), honestly neither version makes sense. If you really think "are" is an appropriate word to describe something that happened in 1998, you lack the competence to edit the English Wikipedia. Graham87 (talk) 05:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I tend to act impulsively. I'll try to not to overedit next time. Rager7 (talk) 05:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]