User talk:Prefectlawyer580

November 2013[edit]

Your recent edits to User talk:1gundy could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. freshacconci talk to me 17:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Giant Snowman 17:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prefectlawyer580 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That content is not truly removed until it is overwatched. In fact, all admins can view copyvio content right now! If you do not unblock me, I will begin legal proceedings tomorrow, of all copyvios detected by Coren Search Bot. I wouldn't be surprised if this runs into the hundreds. Also, I will be notifying all websites where content has been copied and then deleted (but in a way all admins can view them). All you are doing is giving admins a free view of intellectual property. This is both illegal and immoral. I'd say website owners and courts will be pleased about this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CorenSearchBot/results Please unblock me, as 'no legal threat' is a blatant immoral blockade of free speech, as well as the fact that it prevents giving users notice of upcoming legal proceedings. Prefectlawyer580 (talk) 17:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Making even more legal treats in your unblock request was very silly. Giant Snowman 17:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Further - I have withdrawn talk page access due to your repeated legal threats - so if you wish to request an unblock please use this. Giant Snowman 17:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You call Wikipedia immoral and illegal and say that you will be initiating legal proceedings against the organization and then ask to be unblocked to aid your work in "upcoming legal proceedings"? That is exactly what a "legal threat" means. And "free speech" doesn't involve the discussion on a nonprofit website, it's about government control over the right of expression. I would think this fact would be covered in law school, Prefectlawyer580. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:44, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]