User talk:Poriman55

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm 64andtim. I noticed that you recently removed content from Quebec Maritimes Junior Hockey League without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – 64andtim ^(talk) 06:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was decided in Wikiproject Ice Hockey to remove the maps – Poriman55 - Meddela mig! 09:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Puljujärvi[edit]

Hey! My name is HickoryOughtShirt?4 and I am an admin (and hockey fan) on English Wikipedia. I noticed you nominated Jesse Puljujärvi for Good Article status and I have some concerns. I am not going to officially review this article but I recommend doing some more work before nominating it because there are some big issues. I don't mean to come across as rude here, I am simply offering some advice since I know you are new to Wikipedia. Good Articles are supposed to be broad in coverage, which I do not believe Puljujärvi's article currently is. For example, the Return to the Oilers section (which covers three years) is just two sentences. This is definitely not showing broad coverage. The same can be said for the Penguins section. Also, the international section is missing citations and broad coverage of his other tournaments besides 2015 and 2016. This is just my opinion and you are free to ignore it, but I have a lot of experience with GA reviewing and submitting and these are my takes. If it makes you feel better, I didn't nominate an article to GA status until three months or so into officially editing (I did some IP work previously). HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jesse Puljujärvi[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jesse Puljujärvi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 23:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jesse Puljujärvi[edit]

The article Jesse Puljujärvi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jesse Puljujärvi and Talk:Jesse Puljujärvi/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jesse Puljujärvi[edit]

The article Jesse Puljujärvi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jesse Puljujärvi and Talk:Jesse Puljujärvi/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jesse Puljujärvi[edit]

The article Jesse Puljujärvi you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jesse Puljujärvi for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 09:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nakkilan Nasta (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The two Sydän-Satakunta articles are the only ones that meet the WP:GNG standard (and even of them, the first one is borderline at best), and they are not enough to establish notability, especially as they are both from the same publication. I'm not saying this club couldn't be notable, but these sources don't yet demonstrate it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nakkilan Nasta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Poriman55! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]