User talk:PlavorSeol

December 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. KTC (talk) 16:20, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why did you conclude like that. - PlavorSeol | T | C 23:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand my block.[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PlavorSeol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why they think I'm not here to build an encyclopedia.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Summary of my block says:

01:20, 2 December 2018 KTC (talk | contribs) blocked PlavorSeol (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia)

But I don't understand this. I am not intend to vandalize, and haven't. But why they think I'm not here to build an encyclopedia? Like other people, I just want to edit some pages on Wikipedia. I want to contribute. - PlavorSeol (T | C) 12:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you did. You vandalized User:Gmaxwells' user talk page here and then here. Every edit is public and can be traced. So, we can see you are only pretending you don't know the reason for being blocked, since after User:Nick asked you why you had vandalized GMaxwell' user talk page, you first blanked his request for an explanation, here and after he advised you in response to that, in pertinent part: "If you refuse to explain your edit, I shall assume you're not here to contribute to the project and block your account..." you removed that warning message here and acknowledged by your edit summary you had read that message and understood it as a warning. - Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I put some {{Mbox}} to page User talk:Gmaxwell was because I thought he is a very damaging vandal to many innocent people after seeing caption of image at Wikipedia:Autoblock#How it works. At that time, I thought Nick was just threating me, and since there is a long interval between that situlation and block, I didn't thought there are any connections between that.

Now I realized everything is wrong. Now I realized such behavior should not be done. Please forgive me. I promise I won't do it again. - PlavorSeol (T | C) 17:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PlavorSeol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now I realized everything is wrong. Now I realized such behavior should not be done, as I described above.

Decline reason:

Given your history of being blocked on multiple projects for personal attacks, I think you should consider yourself lucky to not be globally locked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:21, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notification of global ban proposal on your account (귀하의 계정에 대한 전역 추방 논의 안내)[edit]

This is a notification of global ban discussion per the global ban policy.

이 안내는 전역 추방 정책에 따라 진행되는 전역 추방 논의에 대한 안내입니다.

— regards, Revi delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]