User talk:Phoenix-anna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hexagon Qualcomm (January 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KGirl (Wanna chat?) 03:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Phoenix-anna! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirl (Wanna chat?) 03:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Phoenix-anna/sandbox/Hexagon Qualcomm has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Phoenix-anna/sandbox/Hexagon Qualcomm. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Encouragement for Hexagon rewrite[edit]

Hi, Phoenix-anna, I think that I see what your approach is at [[../sandbox/Hexagon Qualcomm]], and I’m intrigued. I have to head off to work, so probably can’t write a lot until later on (unless I get some slack time during the day). For now, I just wanted to offer some words of encouragement: don’t give up and don’t get discouraged! :) Pelagicmessages ) – (08:04 Mon 18, AEDT) 21:04, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the "too technical" flag?[edit]

I worked on a total rewrite to this article because it was flagged as too technical. However, I received guidance to make an incremental change rather than a total rewrite, so that is what I did. There is introductory material at the beginning that explains what Hexagon does in a way that does not require familiarity with micro-architecture (although it doesn't attempt to teach the subject starting with zero knowledge because there should be other articles for that, perhaps not even in Wikipedia.)

What do folks think of the article now? Is it too technical? What about the style of the introductory paragraphs?

Hello, Phoenix-anna. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Hexagon Qualcomm".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]