User talk:Philologick

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Philologick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference Errors on 19 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Hydromorphone page, your edit caused a PMID error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sonam Lhamo[edit]

The article Sonam Lhamo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KSFT ^C 08:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Historians' History of the World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Quintus Servilius Caepio (consul 140 BC)

added links pointing to Statesman and Gnaeus Servilius Caepio

Publius Valerius Falto

added a link pointing to Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus

Quintus Valerius Falto

added a link pointing to Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Titus Vettius Scato[edit]

Hello, Philologick. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Titus Vettius Scato, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vinod 09:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Marcus Cornelius Cethegus (consul 160 BC)

added links pointing to Colonia and Marcus Valerius Messalla

Gaius Atilius Bulbus

added a link pointing to Titus Manlius Torquatus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Bogislaus Staël von Holstein

added links pointing to Bender and Vápno

Quintus Baebius Sulca

added a link pointing to Macedonia

Staël von Holstein

added a link pointing to Orientalist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

suggestbot[edit]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		United Kingdom (talk)						Add sources
		Roman Empire (talk)						Add sources
		Octave Chanute (talk)						Add sources
		The Story of Civilization (talk)						Add sources
		Internode (ISP) (talk)						Add sources
		Piero the Unfortunate (talk)						Add sources
		Kipps (talk)						Cleanup
		The Shape of Things to Come (talk)						Cleanup
		Key (music) (talk)						Cleanup
		Qing dynasty (talk)						Expand
		Genealogical tables of the House of Medici (talk)						Expand
		Ulrik Christian Gyldenløve, Count of Samsø (talk)						Expand
		Adam Zbar (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Fall of Giants (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		The Outline of History (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Florin (talk)						Merge
		Florin (Italian coin) (talk)						Merge
		Latin War (498–493 BC) (talk)						Merge
		New Testament (talk)						Wikify
		Italian unification (talk)						Wikify
		Spanish Empire (talk)						Wikify
		Sun Basket (talk)						Orphan
		Epicles (talk)						Orphan
		Eduard Duller (talk)						Orphan
		Quintus Servilius Caepio the Younger (talk)						Stub
		Timeline of the Iraq War (2016) (talk)						Stub
		Albizzi (talk)						Stub
		Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Calvus (talk)						Stub
		Georg Rosen (1821–1891) (talk)						Stub
		Ippolito de' Medici (talk)						Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Veit Stoss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emperor Maximilian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis V, Elector Palatine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neustadt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Philologick. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please decipher your edit of The_Historians'_History_of_the_World#Volume_II:_Israel.2C_India.2C_Persia.2C_Phoenicia.2C_minor_nations_of_Western_Asia[edit]

Hi Philologick. Firstly thanks for your additions to the above. However the following line seems to have been garbled:

Starting with the origins of the people of Phoenicia...

I have fixed it as I think it should be but you may like to refine it. The rest of this section seems to be fine. All the best. DadaNeem (talk) 05:02, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ellagic acid[edit]

Hi, your edit added an erroneous nowiki and removed pecans and walnuts. You apparently noticed that your claim about these not being in the source was erroneous and put them back in, but you didn't notice the automatic warning about the nowiki edit. I've noticed that i make quite a few erroneous edits using the visual editor and a mobile device. You seem to be an expert in the field since you apparently have access to wiley.com. Could you add a free reliable online source or recommend where i can look for one? It's hard to believe pomegranates aren't a good source of ellagic acid since it was among the fruits it was first isolated from. --Espoo (talk) 17:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Black psychology[edit]

I have removed your Proposed deletion of Black psychology as it was not correct. To Propose an article for deletion, please use the syntax {{subst:Proposed deletion|1=Your reason for deletion.}}. This will cause a proper Proposed deletion template to be placed. For more information, please consult WP:PROD. You may try again at Black psychology if you wish. Thanks. Safiel (talk) 15:27, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hi, just ensure that there's no unsourced paragraphs and you'll be fine. Thanks!♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:34, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Anna Petteys) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Anna Petteys, Philologick!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Abishe (talk) 05:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Philologick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Women in Red[edit]

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.25% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Our priorities for December:

Seasonal celebrations First ladies Go local #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 12:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Giant Rooks[edit]

Hi, I'm Rosguill. Philologick, thanks for creating Giant Rooks!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article's subject may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline (see also WP:BAND). The easiest way to demonstrate notability and protect the article from deletion is to provide citations to in-depth coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources. Do note that interviews with the subject are not necessarily considered a suitable demonstration of notability, and other forms of coverage are preferable (see WP:INTERVIEW).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Rosguill^talk 21:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Philologick. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History of Women's Literature in China moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, History of Women's Literature in China, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – DarkGlow • 17:44, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:History of Women's Literature in China[edit]

Hello, Philologick. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of Women's Literature in China, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:History of Women's Literature in China[edit]

Hello, Philologick. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of Women's Literature in China".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Variolation[edit]

Hi and thanks for your edit (removal) of the claims that Chinese variolation came from India. I myself found that hard to believe when I was digging into the sources but couldn't disprove it. If you can, can you share the link with me, I'd be grateful. Thank you! Danial Bass (talk) 10:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I personally found it hard to believe because I've read a few monographs on the history of Indian-Chinese encounters and exchanges and that never came up - which seemed quite surprising if there was any evidence for it. That made me want to search for evidence.

Check out the last paragraph before Conclusions. Unfortunately, I can't find either of the sources cited as 15 and 16. It's becoming a major problem on Wikipedia that I've noticed - Indian precedence is being conjured up and inserted into Wikipedia articles all over the place, often somewhat hidden like in this case to claim Indian precedence without drawing much attention to it. I probably gravitate towards the types of articles that get vandalized in this way, but it's making me really worry about the future of Wikipedia as the rest of the world goes online and starts adding their own nationalistic rewritings of history to it. Our policy that we're not supposed to think, just make sure it's sourced is really going to ruin Wikipedia as more and more nationalists produce their own sources to then cite.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407399/ Philologick (talk) 08:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh defitinely, ethno-nationalistic re-writings in Wikipedia is a big problem here, that's what happens when anyone can edit. Thanks for the link! Danial Bass (talk) 11:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elena Dahl for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elena Dahl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Dahl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 14:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]