User talk:PerfectSoundWhatever/Archives/2022/October

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blue Skies review

Do you think you can talk a look at the Draft:Blue Skies (Seth MacFarlane album)? You had previously decline it, but think it might be ready. Have a good one 166.196.75.77 (talk) 23:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Was already re-reviewed. Please merge it into Blue Skies (Seth MacFarlane album). — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 04:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Article

Hi, you declined my draft Article on the band Tools You Can Trust which I thought was a bit harsh. Any advice on turning your decision around? For example, to reference that they had done 3 John Peel sessions I had simple referenced the Wikipedia page listing this information, but I have now added a reference to the BBC Page about the sessions. Is this the sort of change needed. Red.commenting (talk) 11:28, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

@Red.commenting: Hi there. Fandom and Discogs are not reliable sources (see WP:RSDISCOGS and WP:FANDOM). Remove them, either replace the citations with better ones, or remove the statements they cite. The external link after "There is a reasonably active YouTube channel" is improper (see WP:ELPOINTS). Multiple references are improper. For example, plain text of "Michael Prendergast review March 1984" is not sufficient. Read Help:Referencing for beginners. "Personal Vinyl Collection" is very insufficient. You are allowed to cite liner notes from, say a vinyl, but not as you did it. You use {{cite AV media notes}}.
For an article to be in Wikipedia, you need to demonstrate notability. That means, the subject gets coverage in multiple, secondary, reliable sources, independent from the subject. The article seems to have no such references. The following do not contribute to notability: vendor listing, vendor listing, personal website, record company, whatever this is. Since the other references are improperly formatted (plain text) I cannot verify that they exist, and so do not contribute to notability.
Bear in mind, some subjects simply aren't notable enough to have articles written about them. Let me know if you have any other questions. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 14:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Request for c/e

Hi again, can you please copyedit my new article Rooppur pillow scandal? I created it for DYK. Mehedi Abedin 20:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@Mehediabedin: Sure, I'll try to get to it soon — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 22:58, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay. I did a preliminary copyedit. I'll do a second soon. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 05:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
What a crazy topic! — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 05:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
No problem. Take your time. Yes the topic is crazy, but my country is crazier. So this is not unusual to us. :) Mehedi Abedin 17:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of fatal victims of the September 11 attacks (O–Z)

Notice

The article List of fatal victims of the September 11 attacks (O–Z) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTMEMORIAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of fatal victims of the September 11 attacks (H–N)

Notice

The article List of fatal victims of the September 11 attacks (H–N) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTMEMORIAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@Fram: In case you didn't see my edit summary here, these articles cannot be PRODed since they had an AfD. Not against you bringing all 3 articles to AfD— I just wanted them split. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 15:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Actually, new articles created by a split can be Prodded, as the split article doesn't necessarily have the same notability as the main article (e.g. a school article can survive an AfD, but if you then split the list of headmasters to a separate article, that one can and in many cases should be prodded). I hadn't seen the recent AfD, I would have voted delete but as it was this recent, I'll not start a new one. Thanks! Fram (talk) 15:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Well, I didn't split away from a non list article (like in your school example). I split a purely list article into 3 parts for technical reasons (page crashed vis editor, took too long to load). But I see your point. :) — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 15:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Fair enough, and in any case you are free to remove a Prod for any or no reason at all, and yours was a lot better than many deprods I see. Fram (talk) 15:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Don't Wake Me Up (album)

The article Don't Wake Me Up (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Don't Wake Me Up (album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Troubled.elias -- Troubled.elias (talk) 10:01, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Don't Wake Me Up (album)

The article Don't Wake Me Up (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Don't Wake Me Up (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Troubled.elias -- Troubled.elias (talk) 18:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of It Was Hot, We Stayed in the Water

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article It Was Hot, We Stayed in the Water you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Realmaxxver -- Realmaxxver (talk) 18:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors October 2022 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up for our July Backlog Elimination Drive, 18 copy-edited, between them, 116 articles. Barnstars awarded are noted here.

Blitz: Participants in our August Copy Editing Blitz copy-edited 51,074 words in 17 articles. Of the 15 editors who signed up, 11 claimed at least one copy-edit. Barnstars awarded are noted here.

Drive: Forty-one editors took part in our September Backlog Elimination Drive; between them they copy-edited 199 articles. Barnstars awards are noted here.

Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz begins on 16 October at 00:01 (UTC) and will end on 22 October at 23:59 (UTC). Barnstars awarded will be posted here.

Progress report: As of 19:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 303 requests for copy edit – including withdrawn and declined ones – since 1 January. At the time of writing, there are 77 requests awaiting attention and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,759. We always need more active, skilled copyeditors – particularly for requests – so please get involved if you can.

Election news: In our mid-year election, serving coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tenryuu were returned for another term, and were joined by new coordinator Zippybonzo. No lead coordinator was elected for this half-year. Jonesey95, a long-serving coordinator and lead, was elected as coordinator emeritus; we thank them for their service. Thank you to everyone who took part. Our next election of coordinators takes place throughout December. If you'd like to help out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself or other suitable editors (with their permission, of course!). It's your Guild, after all!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tenryuu and Zippybonzo.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Baffle☿gab 03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PerfectSoundWhatever/Archives/2022/October&oldid=1133123329"