User talk:Peachnellba

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Peachnellba! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

—Tom Morris (talk) 10:06, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PeachNellba[edit]

Well, well, well - fancy meeting you here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OakIslander (talk • contribs) 10:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cookies[edit]

Don't torture me with pictures of cookies! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hln2011 (talk • contribs) 10:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sign bot...[edit]

... will it find me? Hln2011 (talk) 11:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

let's find out :) Peachnellba (talk) 11:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems it did. SignBot is everywhere. :-) The Land (talk) 18:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello Nell. Sorry I was unable to be at the training session, however I should be online most of today and will be happy to help if I can. Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if I can be of assistance. Rockpocket 11:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to check out the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in contributing more to medicine-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (sign up here).

WT:WikiProject Medicine or its quieter subpage, WT:HEMONC, is a good place to get help, ask questions, or share your opinions with other people who are interested in medicine-related articles. Feel free to stop by and say hello. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:43, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding links[edit]

Rather than just adding links it would be better if you worked to improve the content on Wikipedia. Please see WP:MEDRS for referencing requirements. Also it is best not to use sources you are associated with (ie published). Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doc James - I understand your concerns, I am also helping to improve content and this is my main aim of course! The links I've added are to very comprehensive webpages which contain really useful information (please have look if you haven't already), so I thought these additions would be helpful to people using Wikipedia. PeachNellba (talk) 09:51, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes have looked at the content. Just as long as we keep in mind that WP is not a collection of link per WP:NOT [1] Happy editing Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:19, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doc, this user has done some very useful copy-editing over and above the addition of external links. She has definitely "worked to improve the content". Anti-spam efforts are always appreciated, but PN's contributions should be welcomed. The Cancer Research UK links are neutral sources of further information from an expert source. MartinPoulter (talk) 20:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One of the goals is for WP:External links to contain information that the article can't (say, because of copyrights) or shouldn't (say, because it's not precisely encyclopedic). If it merely contains information that the article should, but currently doesn't, contain, then it's often best to use high-quality web resources as a WP:Reliable source. We might replace them with a good textbook or systematic review some day, but between now and then, they're often useful sources for expanding the article. A decent description is more useful to our readers than a bare link, because relatively few of them bother clicking on any external links.

(One of the UK cancer charities went on something of a spamming binge a while back, so it's possible that editors are just a little trigger happy.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:35, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some of us get concerned when we see a group of editors adding the exact same link to dozens of articles without a consensus first. Thus my note here. These links may be deemed as good additions just could use some further discussion first to gain consensus. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:18, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some falafel for you![edit]

HenryScow (talk) 12:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]