User talk:Orionandhsu

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Orionandhsu and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 11:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Chang Dai-chien has been reverted.
Your edit here to Chang Dai-chien was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://taiwanwebmuseum.blogspot.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Hsing Yun do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here to Hsing Yun was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://taiwanwebmuseum.blogspot.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheep-Fat-Oily White Jade for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheep-Fat-Oily White Jade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheep-Fat-Oily White Jade until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 15:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Painting Techniques of Zhang Daqian for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Painting Techniques of Zhang Daqian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Painting Techniques of Zhang Daqian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. freshacconci talktalk 03:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Nomination of Ancient Old Jade for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ancient Old Jade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancient Old Jade until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

user:OrionHsu and User:Orionwebmuseum[edit]

Are you the same person as OrionHsu (talk · contribs) and Orionwebmuseum (talk · contribs) ? -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 11:10, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orionandhsu is a person, while orionwebmuseum is an organization. Someone in Wikipedia even accused Orion Hsu of having spammed the Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia. I don't think that Orion Hsu has anything to do with this orionandhsu. You can not just use Orion and Hsu to say all the user names concerning with Orion and Hsu must be the same persons. There must be thousands of them. This name seems to be very famous for everybody to use it in the internet like Jack and Peter...etc. Orionandhsu (talk) 03:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So you know who user:orionwebmuseum is, and that is a group account, which is not allowed under Wikipedia's account rules. From the web [1] it appears that all three names are used by the same person, and not very common at all. And not famous. -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 02:20, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mutton fat white jade for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mutton fat white jade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutton fat white jade until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 13:11, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action, as well as block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orionandhsu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I deny to have made any legal threat or taken any legal action. The contents I edited are all reference information of truth. Therefore no legal threats stand or no legal actions need to be resolved. Orionandhsu (talk) 03:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So wot's all this then? Granted, there's no explicit legal threat, but if you don't think no one reading that wouldn't see that as a shot across the bow, you are too reckless to be allowed to continue editing. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orionandhsu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Even if you have declined this unblock, I still deny to have made any legal threat or taken any legal action. The contents I edited are all reference information of truth. They were all discussion contents of different opinions including self-defending explanation words that would have been expressed by every defendant in the world. Therefore no legal threats actually stand or no legal actions are needed to be resolved by anybody. Orionandhsu (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you have been advised, the contents of this post are quite clearly intended to chill discussion towards your preferred resolution. As such, a block for WP:NLT is quite obvious, and quite necessary. You will want to re-read WP:NLT, WP:AAB and WP:GAB before making any additional posts to this page as future similar unblock requests (of which you may only do one at a time) will lead to the removal of access to this talkpage (✉→BWilkins←✎) 08:43, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orionandhsu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Even if you have declined this unblock, I still deny to have made any legal threat or taken any legal action. The contents I edited are all reference information of truth. They were all discussion contents of different opinions including self-defending explanation words that would have been expressed by every defendant in the world. Therefore no legal threats actually stand or no legal actions are needed to be resolved by anybody. Orionandhsu (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Technical decline - duplicate unblock request. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Wikipedia users can sign-up anonymously from everywhere in the world including China, Russia, Ukraine, or Africa...etc, please tell me exactly how my opinions of truth can make any legal threat or take any legal action against these anonymous users and are not going to stop their laughters in a room of a faraway remote country side house. Orionandhsu (talk) 06:15, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:VNT, WP:NLT, and - not addressed in any of your unblock requests - WP:BE. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:32, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]