User talk:Onel5969/Archive 50

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 45 ← Archive 48 Archive 49 Archive 50 Archive 51 Archive 52 → Archive 55

Archive 38: January 2018

Happy New Year, Onel5969!

Happy New Year!

Onel5969,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thank you so much Davey2010 - and a very Happy, healthy, and successful New Year to you as well. Onel5969 TT me 02:02, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Phi Alpha

Wasn't aware that linking to a dab page was inappropriate if the appropriate entry in the dab page wasn't one with an article. I do think both of the other Phi Alpha groups are suitable for articles.Naraht (talk) 16:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

No worries Naraht. It happens. We're all amateurs here, and there's lots of stuff I find out on a weekly basis. Take care, and have a very Happy New Year. Onel5969 TT me 16:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Linking to a dab page this is only appropriate if you don't know which one, right?Naraht (talk) 16:39, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Actually, you should rarely purposefully link to a dab page. Either link to the correct page, or don't link. Off the top of my head the only two real reasons to link to a dab page is in a "hatnote" at the top of an article, directing the reader to multiple other usages of the same term, or similarly, in the "see also" sections of articles, for the same reason. Hope this helps. WP:DDD is a very helpful nutshell on dabs. Onel5969 TT me 16:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

17:01:27, 4 January 2018 review of submission by Krisztina.forian


Can you please check the draft now with the modifications you have required and confirm if I can resubmit the article for review. Thanks in advance. Krisztina.forian (talk) 17:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

PLCLogix

Hello, you recently made some edits to the PLCLogix page. This page has now been flagged for deletion due to non-notable references which have since been addressed. Please weigh in with your thoughts regarding keeping or deleting. Peppi35 (talk) 08:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Brian Brushwood DOES Live in Austin

Hello Onel5969: You recently deleted my addition of Brian Brushwood from the article List of People from Austin, Texas. I understand that you did so in good faith, thinking that he does not live in Austin, but only attended UT Austin. Perhaps you were unaware that he has moved back to Austin, where he lives today. I clumsily added a reference to the article on Brushwood as evidence to support this claim. The article, "UT alumnus shares secrets behind magic tricks on YouTube channel" at http://www.dailytexanonline.com/2015/10/19/ut-alumnus-shares-secrets-behind-magic-tricks-on-youtube-channel contains this phrase: "Until 2014, Brushwood toured colleges across the country with his magic show and has since settled down in Austin". I hope this is satisfactory proof for you and you will add him back to the List. DaKine (talk) 01:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi DaKine - not clumsily... I simply missed it. Sorry. Feel free to revert my revert. Onel5969 TT me 02:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft: Walid_Mushtaq

hi sir how are you please review the article as old article was deleted and it was approved by you currently i am again trying to submitted the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Walid_Mushtaq — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pak-work (talk • contribs) 05:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

waiting for your postive response "Onel5969" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pak-work (talk • contribs) 06:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!

A trophy for you!
Thanks for being kind!! 
AlexHuang1029 (talk) 03:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Undo of various peoples contributions

Hi,

You've removed a number of contributions people have made, including factual things from an influence section for a popular book series, I'd like to understand what you feel is required in order for these updates and alterations to be re-placed.

I'm referring to your removing factual quotations from books regarding Harry Dresden in the Benedict Jaka - Alex Verus series, and the Orlando Sanchez "Montague and Strong" series.

These sections help readers who appreciate this particular author find other authors who have been influenced by him, and as such may have a similar story style.

LightstarUK (talk) 15:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

As per Wikipedia guidelines, unsourced material may be removed at any time. And in one instance, the material was pure conjecture, which should always be removed. Feel free to re-add the non-conjectural material, providing there is a citation from a reliable, secondary source showing the veracity of the assertion. Onel5969 TT me 16:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Dab links

Just a courtesy message to let you know you had the wrong end of the stick on Network Development Plan Metropolitan Rail – the link should have resolved to Camberwell railway station, Melbourne. Anyway, I've fixed it; thanks for your work on dab links, you're a brave soul. Triptothecottage (talk) 06:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for catching that Triptothecottage. Onel5969 TT me 15:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Great Leader

Hiya! Did something go wrong here? (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 23:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi The Quixotic Potato - I don't think so... the propaganda page is talking about housing the "Great Leader's" remains, and I pointed to the concept of the Great Leader in North Korea. Do you feel there is a more appropriate link? I could have pointed to Kim Jong-Il, but that is already overlinked, so I thought pointing to the general concept would give the reader more information. Feel free to delink if you think it's inappropriate. Onel5969 TT me 23:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
I know very little about disambiguation, but I thought that since the sentence is: "Although North Korea suffered severe economic hardships in the 1990s, Kim Jong Il had his late father’s Kumsusan Palace extensively renovated to house the Great Leader’s remains, hiring Russian specialists to embalm the corpse for permanent display" it would make more sense to link to Kim Il-sung (the person who the words "Great Leader" are referring to). Maybe I am wrong. What do you think? (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 23:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi again The Quixotic Potato - it would... if it wasn't already linked several times in that paragraph alone. In that instance, the usual circumstance would be to simply delink the dablink (see MOS:DUPLINK). I thought it wouldn't hurt to point to the concept of the great leader in NK, to give readers more information, but as I said above, feel free to delink. Onel5969 TT me 23:55, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Ah ok, makes sense. I think you made the right decision. Like I said before, I know very very little about disambiguation (never even tried it). Thank you! (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 23:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
No worries, The Quixotic Potato - I definitely don't think I'm infallible, so always feel free to hit me up with a question about any of my edits. I never really got into de-dabbing until about 4 months ago, other then when I received a message that I had created a dab on a page I created. But feel free to help out on dabs, there are tons out there, and more made every day. I have to fix dabs to New York every day. Onel5969 TT me 00:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Coronado Island Film Festival

You flagged the CIFF page I created for General Notability which asks me to cite reliable, independent secondary sources. There are already eight articles from seven sources referenced in the page. This page was flagged last week and it was reapproved by User:Elahrairah after I posted those sources the other day. Are you sure that's what the problem is? Warm Regards, Kire1975 (talk) 07:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

I didn't "approve" anything, I just declined the speedy nomination. That said, there are several reliable sources cited in the article and I'm not sure notability is in question. ElAhrairah inspect damage⁄berate 10:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
My apologies, User:Elahrairah. I should have used a different word than improve. I never said I was fluent with very much lingo on these pages, but about notability, I'm pretty sure I'm on solid ground. I've never been flagged so much before in my life. This is confusing and frustrating. Warm regards. Kire1975 (talk) 10:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Kire1975 - For organizations and corporations, which a festival would fall under, there is also the concept of depth of coverage, see WP:ORGDEPTH. All but two of the sources are either linked to the festival, or are local coverage. While the Maltin piece is a nice article, the other from The Wrap is little more than regurgitated press releases. A hint on how to recognize that is that whenever a "news" article includes lines like, "Visit the Coronado Island Film Festival website for Festival Pass purchases," you know it's pretty much regurgitated from a press release. There's a Hollywood Reporter article out there which is very much along the same vein. It might be notable, but I went through the first 150 or so hits on Google News, and couldn't find a single in-depth story about the festival not from a local source. That's not conclusive... for example the Maltin piece didn't come up in the first 150 or so hits, so there very well might be other reliable sources. I tagged it for notability since I couldn't find any more of those reliable sources, but I think it might meet gng, so I didn't propose it on AfD. Hope this helps. Onel5969 TT me 11:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Belated best wishes for a happy 2018

The Fox Hunt (1893) by Winslow Homer, Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.
Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place.

== BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 15:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Reverting to old version...

I finally found someones response to my post (since it was deleted by the time I could look for it and then finally tracked it down)

Someone responded:

Wiki Page Update keeps reverting back to old version Several times I've updated the Prescott Valley, AZ Government Wiki Page, so it is completely updated (mostly whole thing has been changed). It looks updated, then next time I look, it's reverted back to an old version (but does show the updated pics). I've done this two or three times now, re-editing all the sections, and it just won't keep the updates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hldahms (talk • contribs) 18:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

@Hldahms: you might want to go to en:WP:AN instead. Artix Kreiger 2 (talk) 19:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Not a Commons issue, not an Admin issue, but I hope no one will mind if I answer the question where it was asked. @Hldahms: See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prescott_Valley,_Arizona&action=history for the history of edits on that article. en:User:Onel5969 reverted you, with a rather clear explanation: "Rev commentary, non-notable folks." If you feel that's wrong, either take it up on the article's talk page or the user's. - Jmabel ! talk 19:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

The wiki pages I found, led me to the admin report page, so seemed to be a admin issue, even if server admin issue; since it keeps getting reverted. Also, I do not understand the comment of "Rev commentary, non-notable folks." since it is an update to a very old version. Plus I never got to see what your "rather clear explanation" post was. Could you post it on my talk page, so that I can read it? (unless it was the two pic copyright issue, but I don't think so, because I've already written that individual). All we want to do is update the Wiki page.

Thank you for your help. Hldahms (talk) 19:37, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Hldahms - There are several issues. First, I reverted your edits several times for two reasons. First, a lot of it is POV commentary, with sentences like, "a growing, thriving town..." and "a large number of excellent sports fields." Other issues are you continue to add non-notable folks. Rule of thumb is that if someone doesn't have their own Wikipedia page, they are not notable (WP has a very low threshold for notability). Third, those non-notable additions had assertions which were completely uncited. Fourth, and this has nothing to do with me, but it looks like you attempted to upload two pics which were copyright violations and have since been deleted. Hope this helps. Onel5969 TT me 20:45, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

19:59:42, 19 January 2018 review of submission by MaxFZell


I have added all of the citations for the production credits and Emmy nominations that User Onel5969 asked for. MaxFZell (talk) 19:59, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi MaxFZell - nice job. Moved it to mainspace. Onel5969 TT me 23:17, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Violence and attacks

Hello. One note about your recent categorization edits. [1] I think, not each "violence" is "attack". But each "attack" is "violence". So, Category:Attacks should be the subcategory of Category:Violence, but not vice versa. The same problem is related to the subcategories by countries. What do you think? 178.92.144.218 (talk) 17:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I have no idea what you're talking about. Onel5969 TT me 19:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Plz Help Me On Draft:Adhyaan Joy Chakraborty 14:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Zx24 - what would help is if you translated the references into English. Even though they are in a foreign language, the actual citation should be in English. This gives us a chance to evaluate the source. Initially, when Robert McClenon declined your draft, he was absolutely right (in my opinion), because the draft was very poorly sourced. Not speaking Bengali, I have no idea if these new sources (other than The Times of India) are reliable, independent sources. I can tell you that imdb isn't reliable, and the other two which I can read, Sholoanabangaliana.in and gdn8.com, most likely don't go to notability. Sholoanabangaliana.in, in particular does not publish its editorial policy, so it might not be a reliable source. On the surface, not sure if it is a blog or what. The Times article also doesn't help his notability, as it does not cover him in-depth. To show notability, you need several in-depth articles about him, from independent reliable sources. Hope this helps. Onel5969 TT me 14:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Maryvale

If the cited material is inaccurate, then I believe removing it is the best thing to do. Maryvale is not an unincorporated place. It is an Urban Village of Phoenix. The City of Phoenix's website clearly states so. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 00:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Also, Glendale alone, according to this City of Phoenix data page, is bigger in population than Maryvale. Therefore, the assertion that Maryvale's population is bigger than Glendale and Avondale, combined, is untrue. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 00:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Kiteinthewind - You would be correct if you were correct. But according to GNIS (see here]), it is a populated place. Also, the addition of the "overview" section is not as per mos, so please refrain from doing so. And not sure what you're talking about regarding population, since Glendale and Avondale are not urban villages. Feel free to add other cited material back in, but don't include it in erroneous deletions. Take it easy. Onel5969 TT me 02:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The GNIS page that was cited above dates back to February 8, 1980. I believe when we have current materials from the City of Phoenix that attests to Maryvale being an Urban village of Phoenix (as seen here), we should yield to more curent materials. As for the overview section, since it contains a legally defined urban village area for Maryvale, I think we should let it stay, but retitle it. I am not here to start a fight, rather, let's find up-to-date sources. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 03:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
I've incorporated the fact that Maryvale is both a populated area and an urban village, with cites. Also, the overview section was incorporated into the intro text. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 03:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
It doesn't matter when the GNIS page is from. Period. Census figures should always be from the census bureau. Period. It doesn't really matter what you think about the overview section, there are guidelines and that isn't one of them. Some of the additions you've made are good, and after the last round I went back and made the effort to include them. The fact that it is one of 15 urban villages is incorporated and attested. Onel5969 TT me 04:30, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The cite you removed with your last edit was a wayback machine archived version of the same page that was cited (which is now dead). I think deliberately citing a dead link does nothing to improve a page. You said figures should always come from the US Census, but figures from that document do come from the US Census ([2] read: Source: City of Phoenix Planning & Development Research Team, Maricopa Assoc. of Governments (MAG) & U.S. Census Bureau et al. "Census Summary File 1 from Block Group Scale Geography." Washington, D.C. April 1, 2010. Date Created: February 16, 2012). I am going to replace the cite with what I added in there. While I am going to AGF, I must say, with all due respect, that the last revert you made was counterproductive, and contradicts what you stated as the reason for the reversion. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 04:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
You are in violation of WP:3RR, might I suggest you self-revert? Your first mention of the dead link is a valid point, but you find the fitting census source to update it, not put in something not in line with consensus as the source to use for census figures. Your editing of the lead shows a clear lack of understanding of WP:LEAD. Take care. Onel5969 TT me 11:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Then I suggest we actually collaborate to improve the article, which also involves you looking for sources, instead of this current “revert only” approach that you have adopted. I must point out that in your previous efforts to revert the changes I have made, you have erased other contributions that led to a degrading of quality of the article. While I have no intention to OWN, I see no point in erasing other non-controversial edits over the point you illustrated. At this point, I must point out that based on my opinion, the multiple reversions done by you is approaching the point of point-illustrating, which may, in this case, be a TE violation. I have already stated that the source I replaced contains US census figures, and also comes from the polity that rules Maryvale. That means the source is reliable (as in it comes from an authoritative source ie the city, and has basis in the census), and should be included. I urge you to please start contributing to this article. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 16:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Paul Coleman (sailor)

Hi, OneL! I granted a short protection of the article - more for the edit warring than the material itself, because it seems that some of their material is constructive and sourced. But I have a bad feeling about that whole scenario, because of that proposed addition on the talk page. You turned it down as unsourced. But there may be a bigger problem. The inclusion of a [4] (like a footnote) is sometimes a giveaway that the material was copied from somewhere. I couldn’t find anything in a quick search, but it bears investigating for copyvio. There is also the possibility that the IP is really the same COI person. --MelanieN (talk) 02:41, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi MelanieN - The ip is almost certainly the same person. When the article was created back in June 2017, the ip and the editor "Paul Coleman", were making the same types of edits (along with the associated article, Peter Coleman (sailor)). And they tended to edit war back then, with several different editors. But I don't see where their additions were sourced at all. If you look at this version, prior to their edits, and compare it to this version, after their edits, there is no additional sourcing. I agree with you regarding copyvio. But I can't find much on the subject. Thanks for the note.Onel5969 TT me 03:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Moving The Bloodline to Dirge Within

Hi there, I tried to move "The Bloodline (band)" to "Dirge Within", but got a message saying:

"You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reason:

The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid.

Please choose another name, or use Requested moves to ask an administrator to help you with the move.

Do not manually move the article by copying and pasting it; the page history must be moved along with the article text."

Not too sure how to use the Requested moves page. Can you please help me out with this? TheSickBehemoth (talk) 15:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi TheSickBehemoth - You can have it done one of two ways. Either ask an admin directly, if you have a relationship with one (I'm not, so I can't do it for you), or list your request at Wikipedia:Requested moves. A third way is to tag it for speedy deletion (the redirect), using the WP:G6 criteria for a non-controversial move. Once the redirect is deleted, you can move the article, which will then automatically create the correct redirect. (by the way, this last route is the one I usually take) Hope this helps. Onel5969 TT me 15:32, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the info. I am pretty new to this type of stuff, as I've only really ever edited articles and don't have a good grasp with tagging certain articles. It looks like there's a certain way to add as discussion to the Requested moves page, but I am not sure how to do it, as I cannot just edit the page and list my inquiry. Also, I am not sure how to tag an article for speedy deletion. Can you please help with this? I am open with either option. TheSickBehemoth (talk) 16:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
TheSickBehemoth - No worries... watchlist the redirect. I'll tag it for deletion. Once deleted, simply move the page. Let me know if you need anything else. Onel5969 TT me 17:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate it greatly, thank you. I looked at your edits on how to do this and will try that in the future if another similar situation arises. TheSickBehemoth (talk) 18:23, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969/Archive_50&oldid=1137158364"