User talk:Octavosaurus

Thanks for joining us for the 'Liberating our Collections' Workshop![edit]

Thank you so much for attending our workshop - here's ANOTHER kitten to show our appreciation! You are a superstar editor now :) Please do get in touch if you have any queries at all! Happy editing. EriedgenArc (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for joining us for our Wiki Workshop![edit]

Thank you so much for attending our workshop at DCDC 2022 - here's a kitten to show our appreciation. Please do get in touch if you have any queries at all! Happy editing. EriedgenArc (talk) 14:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Hi Octavosaurus! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at East Anatolian Fault that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 21:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry! I will amend that right now. Octavosaurus (talk) 21:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 0 to 9 Magazine (October 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:0 to 9 Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for this. I added so, so many sources to the page after the initial draft got rejected; I'm not sure what else I can do to make sure it passes. 0-9 was a small printed publication so references on it aren't extensive, but it is important to the wider arts movement and to the lead artists who already have Wikipedia pages. Do you have any advice what else I can do? Thanks. Octavosaurus (talk) 13:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Octavosaurus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hi, Octavosaurus

I hope you're enjoying the training!

19:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC) Watty62 (talk) 19:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ian! Last night was a lot of fun and I'm excited for the weekend. Thank you so much for co-hosting! Octavosaurus (talk) 14:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]