User talk:ONaNcle

I am undoubtedly honored by your kind offer, but I am sorry to say that, for present, I can only thank you for it. I do not think I can find time to join in the bilingual wiki. However, it is a very interesting idea! Sincerely yours, Classical Esther (talk) 04:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)== Another life ==[reply]

I feel to be one step of being indefinitely banned ; I did appreciate our exchanges even if we disagreed ; I shall regret most of my recent edits have disappeared including this fully deleted one : "User talk:88.106.151.183" where we were talking together --ONaNcle (talk) 22:34, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember saying anything on an IP talk page beyond correcting your message that their edit had been "deleted by a robot". If there was some later response by you, feel free to continue the conversation on my talk page, or at Talk:The Mousetrap (particularly in the "last will" section, if you were keen for anonymous IPs to respond on your behalf). --McGeddon (talk) 07:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe in robots deleting entries ;-))) may be one day... My main concern is to bring my tuppence about fulfilling queen of crime's last will.

Please tell me, before I start dozens of similar exports, what's your personal feeling about this : http://fr.aleatexte.wikia.com/wiki/The_Mousetrap_unsploil --82.224.88.52 (talk) 14:51, 23 August 2010 (UTC) aka ONaNcle[reply]

What am I commenting on? The fact that it's a copy of the article with the "Identity of the murderer" section deleted? That would be textbook WP:SPOILER: "It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot." --McGeddon (talk) 15:28, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not only today, you're doing a great job on this specific wiki but you didn't answer about the different rules of this Italian one where you'll not find a mere spoiler around the Mousetrap ; anyway, as you appear to have no other objections, I resume my task to build versions unsploil (bad spelling intentional to give an easy access through Google). --82.224.88.52 (talk) 16:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The different-language Wikipedia projects operate under different policies - perhaps Italy's Wikipedia has no spoiler policy, I'm not familiar with it. I'm not sure what you mean by "build versions unsploil", but please keep WP:SPOILER in mind whenever you intend to remove or obfuscate information that could be considered of academic interest. --McGeddon (talk) 16:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks of lot about your useful warnings ; I take the risk anyway... saying to myself it's gonna be easy to delete all my stuff if it appears legally too complex ; I mean it is risky because even if the GFDL licence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_adaptation allows translations and (here) adaptations, I'm not feeling that confident whether my twenty lines deleted are too much or not. --82.224.88.52 (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I really don't understand what you're proposing here. If you want to see some sort of spoiler-related change to the Mousetrap article, I'd suggest discussing that change on the talk page and seeing what support it gets. If you're suggesting a wider change to the English Wikipedia's spoiler policy, Wikipedia talk:Spoiler might be more useful. --McGeddon (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You look at ease in those talk pages... not me because (see above) most of my talks on user pages are either removed or erased... not to mention my misunderstood edit summaries...

When you say I really don't understand what you're proposing here I do agree that I may be nebulous in theory but let me guess that you'll find my work in memory of Agatha Christie more obvious in practice after linking to http://fr.aleatexte.wikia.com/wiki/Spécial:Modifications_récentes where you'll notice they use http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/CVN to fight vandalism and, during all those years there, I very seldom worry (exception today with User Vega Dark) about reversions unlike you do yourself here on the main wiki. --82.224.88.52 (talk) 20:03, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're obliquely announcing that you're going to make spoiler-free versions of the article on a Wikia site, then that's obviously fine. Have fun. --McGeddon (talk) 09:09, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

very long wikibreak[edit]

Hi all, the recent events have hit me hard and I feel that I have let the community down and am not worthy of editing here at the moment. After all, editing is a privilege, not a right. My apologies to those who were troubled by this Spoilergate. I may be back once or twice to see how things are. I don't think I was that important to the project or of that much use and I'm sure you'll manage fine without me. Farewell friends--82.224.88.52 (talk) 19:17, 25 August 2010 (UTC) aka Michel Alencon, anagram of oNaNcle[reply]

Come back soon, there's lots of work that needs to be done here... --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:26, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here... and there [1] ;-))) --ONaNcle (talk) 19:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Mousetrap outside London[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Mousetrap outside London, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 08:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing archives[edit]

Please don't respond to discussion in archive pages. If you want to, please either move the discussion from the archive to the talk page first, or start a new thread pointing at the old one. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 11:59, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Pritchard[edit]

Ce qui a trait à la « déception » de ce personnage, s'agissant du dévoilement du nom du coupable dans La Souricière, commis par au moins deux Wikipédias (EN et FR) me fait sourire, si je songe aux produits dérivés que la personnage en question a laissé réaliser à partir de l'œuvre de sa grand-mère. Je pense à l'« actualisation » de certaines intrigues des séries télévisées Hercule Poirot ou Miss Marple (seconde série, années 2000 et suivantes) voire Les Petits Meurtres d'Agatha Christie. Agatha Christie n'était pas ignorante des faits de son temps, mais la faire complice de certaines propagandes de notre époque, plus de trente-cinq ans après sa mort, ce n'est guère élégant. Alors les leçons émanant de celui qui, dans les faits, se repose sur le confort d'une rente imméritée qui durera jusqu'au 1er janvier 2047... Hégésippe | ±Θ± 11:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

D'autant qu'il s'est récemment renié en faisant mourir Poirot dans un téléfilm ;-))) ONaNcle (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Poirot s'est bien suicidé en ne prenant pas, après le meurtre dont il était l'auteur et qui a terminé sa carrière passée à pourchasser les meurtriers, la médication qui pouvait prolonger sa vie. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 15:17, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

La triple peine qu'entraîne la mémoire impitoyable de Google me décourage

de travailler définitivement sur le wiki francophone
de façon plus particulière de m'abstenir à l'avenir de tout edit dans le Main (on peut donc en discuter ici) d'aucun wiki de la Foundation de rectifier les incohérences du petit-fils d'Agatha Christie. J'aurais d'ailleurs tort d'en vouloir à ce fils pas très malin de Rosalind car c'est grâce à ses maladresses que mon texte à peine paraphrasé s'est retrouvé à environ cinquante millions d'exemplaires sur du papier dont à peu près quinze millions rien que sur des quotidiens japonais. koiNonne aka ONaNcle (talk) 22:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocage sur fr.wikipedia.org[edit]

De mémoire, il ne me semble pas être intervenu pour appuyer ce blocage d'un an intervenu le 9 février 2013. Je pense en tout cas que si vous apposiez maintenant, à un mois de l'échéance du déblocage, une demande formelle de déblocage sur votre page de discussion, celle-ci aurait des « chances » d'être refusée par un ou plusieurs ~~administrateurs~~ opérateurs, non pas sous prétexte de la prochaine expiration du blocage (mais on peut gager qu'elle ne serait pas absente de leur esprit) mais de l'absence d'éléments convaincants sur les apports espérés de votre retour anticipé. Il faut dire que le passé n'aide pas vraiment à vous accorder une confiance aveugle...

Je serais enclin à dire : « Patience » et à conseiller l'abandon de certains comportements qui n'ont pas aidé à vous considérer comme un contributeur indispensable (tout en sachant, évidemment, que personne n'est jamais indispensable). Hégésippe | ±Θ± 15:34, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polled out from another wikipedia[edit]

Category:Polled out from another wikipedia, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:50, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:World class reversi player[edit]

Category:World class reversi player, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll soon deleted those two remarks about categories after having answered at the appropriate place. ONaNcle (talk) 09:33, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Asselineau discussion[edit]

Hello, I saw you undid my revision on the Asselineau's article because of "please have a look at the talk page before doing again this", but I think it should be you who should "have a look at the talk page before doing again this". User Jelt was doing some revisions of removing sourced information from Sud Ouest and L'Express, and changing part of the article where it was thoroughly discussed in the discussion page to reach a consensus but he just ignored that. Please go to undo your revision and come to participate in the discussion to give your point of view. D0kkaebi (talk) 09:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Athlete of the Year may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[http://fr.aleatexte.wikia.com/wiki/Goldenyear Golden Year Award] at [[association football], [[Neymar]] last winner

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vaticoin listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vaticoin. Since you had some involvement with the Vaticoin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]