User talk:Numpty9991

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Numpty9991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is completely, and utterly, ridiculous. I've had this account for a while now. Why precisely have I been indef blocked when I don't even belong to the sockpuppet claimed to be me? I simply asked user:Jpgordon why he has blocked someone else's account without having ever underwent the process of getting a clerk to CheckUser his name to see if he really, really was a sockpuppet (because strangely, they don't appear here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dalai lama ding dong/Archive). A couple of hours later and I'M blocked (and you guessed it - without a checkuser to confirm if I really am a sockpuppet. My username and IP range are completely different from the sockpuppets (he's with BT and I'm with Opal Telecom!!). I'm willing to undergo a checkuser to clear my name for this misdemeanor. This is quite serious what user:Jpgordon has done as an administrator. This should be ringing alarm bells. He's abusing his privileges. I was Blocked, and accused of being a sockpuppet WITHOUT a checkuser! How outrageous! I've been registered since 22 August 2012!!! Why oh why has my IP range been blocked too??? Numpty9991 (talk) 07:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, your opinion notwithstanding. Even without that, your multiple reversions on various articles to edits of other proven socks is seriously suspect. Only another checkuser admin or ArbCom will overturn this block.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, first of all Jpgordon is a checkuser, so I don't know what you're talking about there; and second-of-ly, the age of an account doesn't preclude it from being a sockpuppet, so that's also not something you should be yelling about in your unblock request if you actually want to be unblocked. (I have no opinion on whether the request should be declined or not.) --Closedmouth (talk) 08:32, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see an independent party confirm me an individual and not a sockpuppet then (again the different ISP's would show that I'm not the sockpuppet and the IP range). It seems he hasn't been using the tool at all then to block users. What if I am right. What if he is abusing his privileges? What if he's ignoring them? It couldn't hurt to investigate. I know I'm not a sockpuppet. Our edit patterns should tell you that. There are tools for that. I've seen them. PLEASE just investigate it. Numpty9991 (talk) 08:41, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Look to my edit history of why I even contacted this admin. I left notes on my edit summary because another new user kept deleting comments (which I found strange and knew wasn't according to policy - which the same user is now doing to my comments). I then read over the sockpuppet case and curiously asked the admin why the blocked user hadn't undergone a checkuser process and was automatically blocked. I expected a simple explanation. I was just curious how such a thing could happen. I then found myself blocked and myself accused. On what grounds is there justification for such a block without investigation? Numpty9991 (talk) 08:47, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not the banned sock[edit]

I am DLDD THIS user is not me. Just because he recognises the excellence of my work, before I was banned does not make him me. As he said I am BT and he is not. If there is any way I can help then please let me know. I found out the rules too late, which is a shame because my later work was excellent. However you should not punish anyone who restores my work when they are not me. I AM BANNED HE IS NOT. If he is DLDD then why would he only restore some of my work. How can I help this person? He can only be me if he had two ISPs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.189.129 (talk) 20:22, 19 June 2013 (UTC) set up a time and date and i will send something at the same time as him. How about that?[reply]

I can prove this guy is not DLDD, as this IP address is unique to the one that DLDD used. None of Numpty's log ons will have used this IP