User talk:Noelnixon5

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Noelnixon5, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Noel Nixon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:42, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Noel Nixon[edit]

The article Noel Nixon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:42, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Mamangam (2019 film). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 09:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Suneye1. I noticed that you recently removed content from Master (2020 film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SUN EYE 1 06:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Master (2020 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 07:54, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor (2021 film) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Doctor (2021 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. SMB9 9thx my edits! 08:44, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vijay filmography has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vijay filmography was changed by Noelnixon5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902246 on 2020-12-19T09:35:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:35, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Master (2021 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. BOVINEBOY2008 15:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doctor (2021 film) (December 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs more coverage to show that this passes NFF, particularly as the source given doesn't state the claims of filming having begun or wrapped.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Doctor (2021 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Doctor (2021 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noelnixon5! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Master (2021 film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] We're not interested in editors' personal opinions or evaluations of critical response. And if you are part of the film's PR team or something, please let me know. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Master (2021 film), you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: [2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Master (2021 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [3] Further, even if sourced, see the various discussions at WikiProject Film about the use of "mixed to ___" phrasing. Short story: it's shunned by the community as meaningless. "Mixed" already means "positive and negative". "Mixed to positive" would mean "positive and negative to positive". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template formatting[edit]

Hi there, this edit was not constructive. Please don't refactor templates if you don't know how they work. The previous formatting with the pipes, i.e. | is the correct way to generate line breaks in the {{ubl}} template and similar, rather than HTML coding. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have dis![edit]

A cute gift for you!

Have this doggo as my present to you!

Thank you for your contributions so far :)

-- KindCowboy69 ☮ 13:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless changes[edit]

Please stop making pointless changes like this, which contravene both WP:SURNAME and WP:OVERLINK. And if your edits are reverted, your recourse is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek discussion for the change you prefer, not to obnoxiously resubmit the problematic content over and over again. Since you apparently feel very strongly about this, what exactly is your argument for why we should have two links to the article on Vijay Sethupathi within one line of each other, or why we should repeat his full name when we already indicated his full name a line above, and when repeating his full name is in contravention of WP:SURNAME? I eagerly await your response. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cyphoidbomb, I just made some changes to Thalapathy 65 page without my IP address and the creator didn't remove it because he liked my work. Please unblock me

January 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noelnixon5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Cyphoidbomb, I was making some constant changes to the page of Master as some of the contents were not right. I just wanted to make sure that everybody got to know the correct information. I have been blocked for over 3 months now. Please unblock me and I will make sure that I will not make constant disruptive changes to any page from now Noelnixon5 (talk) 14:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noelnixon5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, please listen to me carefully. I had edited the page of Master (2021 film) multiple times because most of the information conveyed was false and was in an irregular manner. I played my part as a Wikipedia editor and made some small changes to the cast page. I also added a remake section to the page with relevant information and nobody removed it because it was true information. I still see some errors in the page and I feel like rectifying it so that readers can get proper information. So far all pages I have edited has never had problems other than some people who have ego problems against the main actor of that specific problem. If any of you guys still feel that I should be blocked from editing, please convey it to me. Other than that I still feel I should be unblocked so I can make proper changes to pages I feel that should be edited. Thank you Noelnixon5 (talk) 06:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You appear to have repeatedly made the same edits to Master (2021 film) despite other editors having reverted them, and failing to engage with other editors raising concerns about your edits. In order to be unblocked, you're going to need to demonstrate that you understand that communication is required and describe how you will deal with similar disputes in the future. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.