User talk:Newstoryteller

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Before you write any more articles like this one, please read WP:CRYSTAL and Wikipedia:Notability (films). Woogee (talk) 05:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of My Fake Husband[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, My Fake Husband, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Fake Husband. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woogee (talk) 05:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with My Fake Husband. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 06:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize for creating this article without fully understanding what's acceptable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This script garnered both fellowship from KOFIC and New Writers Award by CAPE/Fox as a runner-up; however, the film hasn't started its production yet. Please delete this article. I am a new user. By the time I realized what AfD and talk pages were, I wasn't able to explain the situation since I was already blocked. I didn't mean to delete the notices. Thank you. Newstoryteller (talk) 17:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay to make mistakes, and the information about My Fake Husband may yet be kept (although probably not in its own article, see the discussion). However, you were asked not to remove the deletion discussion tags a number of times, and continued to do so. If you recognise and understand your mistakes, and will not repeat them, then you are welcome to follow the discussions on the template at the bottom of this page, and add the {{unblock|Reason}} template, replacing Reason with an explanation of how you understand your mistakes and will not repeat them. An administrator will then review your block to determine whether or not it should be lifted. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 00:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Newstoryteller (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It was an innocent mistake as I was completely unaware of separate talk pages. I didn’t even know that another editor was sending me a warning. Back then, I just saw strange tags popping up while I was trying to edit the content of the page; so, I deleted them. That’s how it happened. Of course, now I know what they are, and it won’t happen again. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Your story is difficult to believe, since every time you get a new message a big orange bar pops up on whatever page you are editing to tell you that you have a message. I also fail to see how edit warring over a deletion tag could be a simple mistake. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, I do apologize for my mistake. I honestly wasn't familiar with Wikipedia at all - messages (I didn't know that people were able to send messages to one another), tags, discussions, talk pages, etc. I've learned all of those in the past few days. I, however, understand that it may be difficult for you to believe what I say. Thank you for reviewing my request. Newstoryteller (talk) 02:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Journey (film)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Journey (film), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey (film). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woogee (talk) 06:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Christine Shin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 06:10, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Janie, you will be blocked from editing.

I haven't nominated it for deletion yet. Provide reliable sources, and stop vandalizing. You must read and understand WP:BLP. Woogee (talk) 06:11, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with My Fake Husband, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Woogee (talk) 06:12, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are just not getting it. You will be blocked from edting if you don't stop your actions. It might help if you discussed your edits on a Talk page. Woogee (talk) 06:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:19, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Christine Shin[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Christine Shin, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://kcet.org/finecut/2006/filmmakers.php#shin), and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Christine Shin saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Racepacket (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]