User talk:NeonFor

Welcome!

Hello, NeonFor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 17:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, NeonFor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ekstraklasa venues, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 17:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ekstraklasa venues[edit]

The article Ekstraklasa venues has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No meaningful content - just a template and a category

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 17:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:56, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stadion Wrocław[edit]

Akurat to zdjęcie ukazuje stadion w bardzo dobrym świetle, dodatkowo pokazuje go w całości, a nie tylko kawałeczek z jednej strony. Jeśli nie odpowiada ci to że koło stadionu jest nie wykończony parking to zrób aktualne zdjęcie z lotu ptaka i je zamieść. Niestety nie jest to łatwe i dlatego to zdjęcie zasługuje na uwagę. Co do wyglądu samego stadionu to może i z zewnątrz nie jest najładniejszy, ale za to wewnątrz, głownie dzięki jednopoziomowym trybunom to najlepszy stadion w Europie. Nie widzę problemu aby umieścić zdjęcie, które tak promujesz, ale nie w infoboxie, skoro sam mówisz że ten stadion z zewnątrz nie wygląda zbyt ciekawie to może lepiej skupić się na prezentacji jego wnętrza. 87.99.45.74 (talk) 10:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stadion Piast, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PLN and 2. Bundesliga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PGE Arena Gdańsk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Letnica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bydgoszcz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1998 FIFA World Cup line-ups[edit]

Are you making yourself clear? No, not really. The source for the line-ups themselves is the report on the FIFA website, but we have very few reliable sources for the exact positions the players occupied. You say we have the match itself, but the players' positions during the entire game are too fluid, so we go for the starting positions, which we do not have sources for. – Pee Jay 21:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Football-lineups.com is not reliable for the simple reason that I could easily set up my own similar website, post whatever line-ups I want and use that as a source; we have no idea who Football-lineups.com's contributors are or what their expertise is. ITV, however, is a UK broadcaster who have numerous experts working for them; the line-ups shown in their broadcasts are likely determined by their experts or by official documents provided by FIFA for the game. – Pee Jay 21:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that would suit me. – Pee Jay 21:59, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:00, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On your edit[edit]

Please refrain from personal attacks, as such you have done, when you write an edition summary. I have reverted it simply because the claim was unsourced. Thanks. --B.Lameira (talk) 23:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering. Remember that Poland has a quite low GDP per capita and there are countries like UAE and Qatar, which have high income economies and higher GDP per capita. But because they have such great income inequality they are not classified as developed countries. The point is not even that, to Wikipedia standards claims must be referenced, to avoid being original research. If you can prove the claim with a reliable source, of course it can be put back in. --B.Lameira (talk) 23:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Just to clarify, I'm talking about nominal GDP per capita. --B.Lameira (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NeonFor (talk · contribs), I think it is alright as long it does not contain the term "developed country", without a reference. --B.Lameira (talk) 16:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, NeonFor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Risk of 3RR at Poland[edit]

Poland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please be aware of our WP:Edit warring policy. You and Madreterra are both at risk of violating WP:3RR. It is better to use the talk page. Some options for resolving a dispute are listed at WP:Dispute resolution. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:15, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poland is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBEE[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 12:49, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Your recent editing history at Poland shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. –Davey2010^Talk 19:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do want to state one thing - I couldn't care less whether the info at Poland stays or goes however you were warned by EdJohnston to cease edit warring and yet you've continued so I would strongly advise you stop and discuss the changes, I see Ed had started a discussion on the talkpage however instead of debating it or discussing yourself you've just come to revert again and again and again which isn't a great idea so again I would ask you to go to the talkpage and seek consensus (or if need be start an wp:rfc), Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 20:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, NeonFor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, NeonFor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gdańsk[edit]

Please do not change the pictures in the gallery unless they are of supreme quality and are actually similar of size. Thanks. Oliszydlowski (talk) 03:35, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Czy Ty czasem nie za często próbujesz na siłe odwracać edycję innych? "supreme quality"? O czym w ogolę mowa? Rozmiar galerii jest tak śmiesznie mały ze zdjęcia o kilkukrotnie gorszej jakości niż te które tam są nadawałyby się i tak perfekcyjnie. Argument wyssany z palca. Po drugie u mnie nic się nie rozjeżdża i nie wiem o czym mówisz przyczepiając się do ich rozmiarów i proporcji, nie wiem na jakim ekranie je tak widzisz. Po trzecie jak można napisać że jest dobrze tak jak jest??? diabelski młyn na ostatnim zdjęciu już nawet NIE ISTNIEJE, a zabudowa tam zmieniła się o 100%, kościół został w całości odnowiony i wygląda delikatnie mówić "inaczej" niż na tym prehistoryku a stadion stał się ostatnimi laty jednym z najbardziej rozpoznawalnych obiektów w mieście. Tym samym Zbijam każdy twój argument.

Zdaje sobie sprawę że robisz na Wikipedii sporo dobrego i ze stoisz po tej dobrej stronie (wiadomo o co chodzi) w tematach związanych z Polską dlatego nie zamierzam zbyt intensywnie występować przeciwko Tobie szczególnie, że liczba Twoich wrogów tutaj jest nie do pozazdroszczenia ale powinieneś zdecydowanie bardziej merytorycznie podchodzić do niektórych spraw i nie bawić się w "strażnika Teksasu" tematów o Polsce na anglojęzycznej Wiki. Po prostu wykaż się tym razem i przywróć stosowną edycję. BEZ ODBIORU. NeonFor (talk) 10:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the deletion of subregional sections from List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita[edit]

There is always disagreement in existence about the classifications regarding certain countries, especially some transcontinental countries. Such as Turkey or Cyprus, about which somebody do not agree to be defined as Asian nations but rather being considered "European", despite the fact that their geographical locations primarily located in Asia, similar disagreements happened to Mexico, Russia and so on. Does that mean it is better to simply dodge the issue, and delete the whole section just because a few people disagree with the geographic scheme? We know that there would always people have different sorts of classifications depending on the personal opinions, thus why a standard was set to make it fair and well-grounded. There is a settled standard which was seeked as consensus, hence the United Nations Geoscheme was adopted, as always people would need to use it in searching for more specific areas. I do not perceive that a dodging attitude like you did to just "make it blank" in order to avoid any complaint is the correct solution to deal with everything. It could just be a expedient way to sidestep anything you do not like, but it is NOT the resolution in solving the controversy. LVTW2 (talk) 12:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

change UAE colour in GDP per capita (PPP) map page[edit]

UAE should be coloured blue on this page as it's GDP per capita is above $60,000. Can you please correct this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkswapper1 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please change Taiwan's colour in the map of GDP per capita (PPP) page[edit]

Hi @NeonFor. There's an error in the "Map of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita in 2022 by IMF.png", Taiwan's GDP (PPP) per capita is 68,729.509 in the source so it should be blue. Thanks.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Poland national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olympiastadion. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]