User talk:Msouryadeepta

National varieties of English[edit]

Wikipedia does not give preference to any national variety of English over others. In some cases there is a good reason for using one national variety; for example in the article Winston Churchill it makes sense to use British English, while in the article San Fransisco it makes sense to use US English. However, when there is no such specific reason for preferring one version, it is not acceptable to change content of an article to comply with one's own preferences. JBW (talk) 09:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Will be followed from further contributions. Thank you for your guidance. Msouryadeepta (talk) 09:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Souryadeepta Majumdar (February 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Msouryadeepta! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Souryadeepta Majumdar. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Souryadeepta Majumdar[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Souryadeepta Majumdar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Data Driven Astronomy (May 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Chaotic Enby were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Data Driven Astronomy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 16:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Data Driven Astronomy (May 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheTechie were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please fix the issues before resubmitting. If you resubmit it again within a short timeframe without fixing anything, your draft will be rejected, meaning that you cannot resubmit it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Data Driven Astronomy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Data Driven Astronomy (May 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TheTechie was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The purpose of Wikipedia is not to host essays, and as such, this draft has been rejected. There are also no inline citations, an unclear citation style, and a plethora more of issues.

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 16:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Data-driven astronomy[edit]

Hello, Msouryadeepta,

Thank you for creating Data-driven astronomy.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Adding tag as you have declared a COI

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 14:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954:

I have seen the issue and am working on it. Thanks for pointing it out clearly. Msouryadeepta (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Data-driven astronomy[edit]

Hello, Msouryadeepta,

Thank you for creating Data-driven astronomy.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page appears to be a description of a research project. It's independent notability is very unclear.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 14:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954: Thanks a lot for the clarification. Since this was my first article, I find it miserable in maintaining the points. I am trying to improve it as soon as possible.

Msouryadeepta (talk) 14:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Souryadeepta M Msouryadeepta (talk) 14:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Msouryadeepta, just wanted to let you know that I've marked the page Data-driven astronomy as reviewed. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions as well. Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Data-driven astronomy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Data-driven astronomy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data-driven astronomy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 08:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay. Thanks a lot. I would like to stay updated with the discussion. Msouryadeepta (talk) 09:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]