User talk:Mr Mines Engine

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mr Mines Engine, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited USATC S118 Class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Myloi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Mr Mines Engine, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Mr Mines Engine. Thank you for your work on Manila Railway V class. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Manila Railway W class[edit]

Hello, Mr Mines Engine,

Thank you for creating Manila Railway W class.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hullo, I hope you're well. Please add sources to this article. Where is the information coming from? If you have questions, you can get help at the Teahouse or on my talk page. Cheers, 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 17:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cremastra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Manila Railway W class moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Manila Railway W class. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know how to add references to pages. Mr Mines Engine (talk) 18:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can ask for help at the teahouse or read WP:REFB. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manila Railway W class (January 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manila Railway W class and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PNR 1500 class moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to PNR 1500 class. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Locomotives of the Caledonian Railway, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 20:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:No_7_Caledonian_Railway_Number_Plate.jpg Here Mr Mines Engine (talk) 06:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images are user generated content, not a reliable source. A source would be something like a news article, or a webpage from the NRM stating it’s in their collection. Danners430 (talk) 09:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Pacific 1273[edit]

Hello! I looked over the article Southern Pacific 1273 and I noticed that some of the facts you added are not supported by the source. It's very important that all of the information preceding the citation is supported by it, otherwise we may mislead readers into thinking the information is sourced when it isn't. Another useful tip is that you can incubate articles in WP:DRAFT space if they're not ready, so that way you can make sure they have enough sources and more than just a few sentences. Thanks for contributing, and I hope we get to see more from you! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I took source from other websites but i didn’t felt like adding all of them so i decided to add the offical Travel Town Museum’s article of the engine. Mr Mines Engine (talk) 18:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should definitely cite the sources you actually used. Saying all the information came from Travel Town Museum's article is misleading. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=979572 I know i got information from this. Mr Mines Engine (talk) 18:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is that content that was uploaded by someone? If it is user generated content isn't reliable and shouldn't be used to write an article. Any article you write should be cited to reliable sources where you got the information. It's important that articles on Wikipedia are verifiable so readers can check the information for themselves. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But thats where i got the infomation from. Mr Mines Engine (talk) 19:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) If information can’t be verified by reliable sources, it doesn’t belong on Wikipedia, it’s as simple as that. Danners430 (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Pacific 1233 (March 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Trainweb is a hosting platform for personal railfan sites and therefore not a reliable source. You need multiple reliable, independent, secondary sources to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southern Pacific 1233 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quincy Railroad Co. 2 (March 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Trainsandotherthings were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost every source is unreliable, and this is written from a fan POV, not like an encyclopedia article. Requires a fundamental rewrite and proper sourcing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quincy Railroad Co. 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Can you explain why User:Aecws recreated Draft:Quincy Railroad Co. 2 the day after it was deleted for copyright violations introduced by you, and why Aecws' version of the draft was then also deleted for copyright violations from the same website as the first time? Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All i did on the page was submit the page, that’s all. Mr Mines Engine (talk) 20:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so you have no relation to Aecws? Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also no i have no relation to them. Mr Mines Engine (talk) 20:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No added information. Mr Mines Engine (talk) 20:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. I got confused because you were the submitter and the decline message came to you. From a more thorough examination of the facts, the only thing I can say is you should make sure drafts you are submitting aren't copyright violations to the best of your ability. My apologies for the warning, I've removed it as you did not in fact commit any copyright violations. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: East Broad Top 12 has been accepted[edit]

East Broad Top 12, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 11:16, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valley Railroad 97 has been accepted[edit]

Valley Railroad 97, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 11:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canadian Pacific 2839 has been accepted[edit]

Canadian Pacific 2839, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 11:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great Western 51 (March 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Despite a heavy WP:REFBOMB, essentially all of the sources are self-published or otherwise unreliable. Please review WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Great Western 51 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canadian Pacific 2860 (March 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Trainsandotherthings were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lose the quotes. This is an encyclopedia, not a newspaper. This is so thoroughly WP:REFBOMBed that no reviewer is going to want to sort through the endless unreliable sources (forums, blogs, railfan picture hosting websites) to analyze notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Canadian Pacific 2860 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:28, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This automated message came to you, even though you didn't submit it or edit it in any way, because Aecws entered your name in the AfC submission box. It was also a wholesale copyright violation. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So they are using my name as bait, fun- Mr Mines Engine (talk) 11:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great Western 75 (March 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guessitsavis was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Great Western 75 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 14:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Just for info, there's a discussion about Aecws using your name when submitting AfCs. The thread is at WP:ANI#User:Aecws - repeated copyvios, and constantly submitting AfC requests under someone else's name. Danners430 (talk) 14:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great Western 75 (March 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guessitsavis was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not delete or modify past review statements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Great Western 75 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 20:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh

The sooner this ANI is resolved, the better for your notification inbox! Danners430 (talk) 21:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Pacific 1233 (March 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more than one source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southern Pacific 1233 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 09:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Mr Mines Engine. Thank you for your work on Caledonian Railway 492 Class. Trainsandotherthings, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs secondary sourcing to demonstrate notability.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Trainsandotherthings}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited USATC S100 Class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Railway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Southern Pacific 1273 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southern Pacific 1273 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Pacific 1273 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]