User talk:MrGoldenfold007

MrGoldenfold007, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MrGoldenfold007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Copyright

Hi - please be careful not to add links to websites that host work in violation of copyright laws. I saw no credible indication at that site that the person who uploaded the file it was linking to owned the copyrights to it. There's more information at WP:COPYVIO. Thanks Girth Summit _(blether) 15:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: For the King has been accepted

For the King, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:59, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Reverts

What is unconstructed in my edits? Is it prohibited in wikipedia to add info about bugs? Orange-kun (talk) 20:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your edits are not properly cited and your English is not exactly correct. MrGoldenfold007 (talk) 03:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Steam is not a source or you can't do your own contribs editing my words? Is that a reason for reverting?--Orange-kun (talk) 13:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Did you read this? Wikipedia:Reverting Where is it said that I must contribute in perfect English to avoid reverting? Also please note this Wikipedia:Restoring part of a reverted edit you just press one button and deleting all my work calling it disruptive or unconstructive without even checking it. And then you talk about grammar. I provided a source on Steam and you just ignored it totally, yes, let it better be written correct but with old info. If you see grammar mistake you should fix that not revert.--Orange-kun (talk) 13:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

I am the second user to have reverted your edits on the AoM page and with both of us you have not accepted any critique and kept adding your information back. Both your sourced and unsourced, correctly worded and incorrectly worded information adds nothing to the article so that is why I removed it all and why any other editor will do the same.

I'm not going to discuss this with you any further. If I want to continue an discussion as enlightening and stimulating and this one I will simply turn around and begin one with the wall behind me. Someone else is going to come around and revert your edits and I just don't have the time to deal with someone acting like a child. MrGoldenfold007 (talk) 14:40, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Maybe stop reverting the all things I add to wikipedia?

If you want to improve wikipedia and not show your snobbery, you can change the wording a little and add to my sentence, instead of abusing the undo function. I've been editing Wikipedia for 14 years and I know how it should work. Orange-kun (talk) 07:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Yeah so you should probably keep those "skills" of yours within the Russian Wikipedia. Your English is full of mistakes and you clearly have a hard time understanding any feedback you get from other editors. I speak Hungarian at a fairly high level of proficiency but I am not going to go and edit Hungarian Wikipedia pages anytime soon. It is rather clear that your pettiness and pride with regards to the AoM article is you projecting your own insecurities regarding your English proficiency. MrGoldenfold007 (talk) 15:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)