User talk:Moscowdreams

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Moscowdreams, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:00, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:00, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Moscowdreams! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:00, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BITE[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Three_Identical_Strangers&direction=prev&oldid=848101600 was accepted as an article after you moved if from main space.

Don't WP:BITE the newbies! Do your research on an article before you move it to Draft space!!!!! Moscowdreams (talk) 03:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sexpionage, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Hudson and Jason Matthews (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Schneiderov moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Vladimir Schneiderov, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Newslinger talk 19:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vladimir Schneiderov has been accepted[edit]

Vladimir Schneiderov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 07:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Andrew Base. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The Forsaken: An American Tragedy in Stalin’s Russia— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Andrew Base (talk) 05:18, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello Moscowdreams, please accept my apologies I made a wrong revert and you are right everyone makes mistake and I am not an exception of this. Thank you for your contributions, if you have any queries you can ask at the Teahouse or if you want you can drop a message on my talk page. Cheers. Andrew Base (talk) 04:11, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article[edit]

Hi, I'm not an admin so can't send it but you can request it to be emailed to you at WP:REFUND. If you need any help let me know, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

blocked[edit]

Hi Moscowdreams. Your account was not blocked, but you were affected by an IP range block that was meant for a different user, which was set to disallow edits from logged-in accounts. I have given your account the IP block exempt flag, which will allow you to edit even if you are editing on a connection like this one. This flag will expire in one year. If you find that you are still not able to edit because of an IP range block, please email functionaries-en@lists.wikimedia.org and refer to this discussion. I apologize for the inconvenience. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you unblock an obvious IRA account? Makes little to no sense.
IRA, what does that stand for? 18:38, 15 June 2020 (UTC) :-o lol. 18:38, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Let's Sing Country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Minnich moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sarah Minnich, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 10:48, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On The Wave (2019 film).Diannaa (talk) 16:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kim Philby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Active Measures (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American decline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Hudson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ilf and Petrov into One-storied America. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

American decline
added a link pointing to Harold James
Predictions of the collapse of the Soviet Union
added a link pointing to Harold James

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mauk, Miller, & Hawkins, LLC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Placeholders in templates[edit]

Hey Moscowdreams,

Since templates are automatically rendered in every article where they're included, you can't have visible placeholders like [*]. If you want a "template" for future additions, put it inside an HTML comment: <!-- [*] --> - that way it'll be hidden from view.

Cheers,

François Robere (talk) 15:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fermi paradox[edit]

Template:Fermi paradox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. jps (talk) 00:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conversation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_1#Template:Fermi_paradox


==== Template:Fermi paradox ====
  • {{Tfd links|Fermi paradox}}

Misguided. A template may work, but not like this. Requires discussion at Talk:Fermi paradox. jps (talk) 00:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Even in theory, it's redundant to Template:Extraterrestrial life, where all articles related to the Fermi paradox would be and are listed. I think some adjustments at that template may be in order, but that does not concern us here. As it is now, this template is also highly problematic because many of the articles listed have no plausible relation to the Fermi paradox, it contains major formatting and spelling errors despite its use in an article, and it attempts to inappropriately contain external links. Crossroads -talk- 02:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It's not so much a template about the Fermi paradox as it is a box full of stuff that people who are into space and science and all might find, you know, cool. Cloning and Head transplants have nothing to do with the Wow! signal. Cut away all the things that don't belong (including the inappropriate external link), and there's not enough left to warrant a template at all. XOR'easter (talk) 02:38, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (edit conflict) - Far-fetched relationship between items, I also liked this posted at WP:FTN: "What do cloning and head transplants have to do with the Wow! signal?" by XOR'easter. —PaleoNeonate – 02:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved this to user space. Moscowdreams (talk) 15:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

template


Moscowdreams (talk) 16:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to The Man's Guide to Women has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 00:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your overzealous counterproductive bullying of deleting other editors contributions

I have watched your edits from afar for years User talk:Diannaa in complete shock and disgust. I haven't spoken out for years because you are powerful and have the blessing of the Wikipedia foundation and Jimbo. But your deletion of material is bullying. You cloak yourself in Wikipedia policy, but it doesn't change the fact that you bully editors.

Your deletion of whole sections completely ignores fair use. You are a detriment to the future of Wikipedia and the original spirit that wikipedia would be a encyclopedia of all knowledge. To have people like you in charge and such a prominent member of Wikipedia, shows how much wikipedia has lost its way.

I know what this post means for me, you and your proxies will now ruthlessly watch every edit I make, and will probably come up with a reason ban me, because that is what bullies do.

Your behavior is best described in The New York Review of Books article, The Charms of Wikipedia

"wannabe tin-pot dictators masquerading as humble editors."

Moscowdreams (talk) 09:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
ST47 (talk) 20:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:KGB/Active measures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --TheImaCow (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sarah Minnich[edit]

Hello, Moscowdreams. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sarah Minnich".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:39, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Special Propaganda[edit]

Information icon Hello, Moscowdreams. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Special Propaganda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Special Propaganda[edit]

Hello, Moscowdreams. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Special Propaganda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]