User talk:Mlspriest

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

criminalwatchdog.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://www.criminalwatchdog.com

See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 18:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Cirius Messaging[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Cirius Messaging requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20170615170258/https://cirius.com/prev/secure-messaging-patents/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SOC Telemed[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SOC Telemed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ... discospinster _talk 15:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Hello, Mlspriest. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but SOC Telemed has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

For more information, please see User:Dlohcierekim/g11d. Cheers, and happy editing. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mlspriest/sandbox[edit]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Mlspriest/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:05, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:SOC Telemed, from its old location at User:Mlspriest/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:18, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SOC Telemed (December 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SOC Telemed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SOC Telemed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mlspriest! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SOC Telemed's "technology": hardware and software?[edit]

You might want to clarify the tech used by SOC. I assume they created proprietary software, and they design systems using off-the-shelf hardware? You might want to mention the word software or system somewhere to clarify, encyclopedically, what they sell specifically in "providing solutions". You might even mention the number of patents the company holds. Wikipedia readers are more likely to be tech nerds than hospital admins, if you get what I'm saying.--Quisqualis (talk) 05:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so very much Mlspriest (talk) 15:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

Hello Mlspriest. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mlspriest. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mlspriest|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. John from Idegon (talk) 12:48, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am so confused. What are the nature of my edits? How does one actually get an article published? This is a legitimate company worthy of an article. Its competitors are on Wikipedia with language that is much more promotional. I am not being compensated. Mlspriest (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I must confess that I have been under the same impression as John from Idegon, above. If in fact you are simply a major fan of the company, then you are using promotional language without being aware of it. This is possible, as promotional language has infiltrated regular English, and nobody seems to be aware of it. However, such language doesn't belong here on Wikipedia, and I get rid of it.

By the way, I am still trying to find out what exactly this company sells. I guess it is some apps and optional access to their physicians. Could hardware be part of what they sell? I am going to look for telemedicine journals which cover this company.

As I am interested in cleaning up NPOV, what other telemedicine companies have WP articles?--Quisqualis (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! They have telemedicine hardware and a platform that hospitals connect with patients remotely. It’s actually a really cool company that I became aware of during hurricane michael. They were in the news because they helped doctors perform remote medical care to people who couldn’t make it to a hospital. I’m from a rural area and telemedicine is important for areas where there aren’t a lot of doctors. Thank you. Other companies I’ve seen are: american well, teladoc health, mdlive and a bunch of others Mlspriest (talk) 21:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can probably clear up confusion I had re Hurricane Michael. Was the hospital functional, and the remote doctors could link up with hospital doctors to get treatment advice during the hurricane? --Quisqualis (talk) 21:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flooding was so bad that doctors couldn’t get to the hospital and there were a ton of patients with flood related injuries. This company enabled the hospital to provide patients emergency care remotely during the emergency. They created a system that a lot of hospitals use now for patients treatment during disasters. Cool eh? Mlspriest (talk) 00:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let me get this right. The hospital had emergency patients, but no doctors due to flooding. And the doctors could link from home (or was it some intermediate location?) via SOC Telemed's system ‎ to the hospital and remotely treat patients?--Quisqualis (talk) 04:20, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. They could link from their own homes to the hospital (if I remember correctly and I think I do) Thank you Mlspriest (talk) 19:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Mlspriest! You created a thread called Could someone please help me with an article? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SOC Telemed (April 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by DGG were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is a press release, not an encyclopedic article.

There is in addition insufficient information to show notability -- al he references are mere menions or press releases

DGG ( talk ) 18:50, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me why this deserves a wikipedia article then? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Well

And this? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teladoc_Health

At least be consistent Mlspriest (talk) 19:02, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here “al he references are mere menions or press releases” Mlspriest (talk) 19:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:SOC Telemed[edit]

Hello, Mlspriest. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SOC Telemed".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 00:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]