User talk:Misssinformative

This account has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser evidence confirms that the account's owner has abusively used multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets · sockpuppet investigations casepage)

Evil will not prevail.

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Misssinformative, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Cirt (talk) 08:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userspace page to work on proposed draft article[edit]

User:Misssinformative/Emily Schooley

Now you have a link to it, here at your talk page. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 08:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

:Thanks. How do I get the page undeleted? Misssinformative (talk) 08:41, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Try WP:UNDELETE. -- œ ^™ 09:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply re state of userspace draft[edit]

I would say you should start by reading through all of the helpful linked pages in the "welcome" message, above. Then read WP:Article development, as well as WP:RS, WP:V, WP:CITE, and WP:CIT. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 09:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have. I feel the article meets the guidelines outlined. I would like it to be undeleted. Misssinformative (talk) 09:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deficiencies at User:Misssinformative/Emily Schooley[edit]

User:Misssinformative/Emily Schooley

There are pieces of info on the page that are unreferenced. This violates policy, per WP:V.
- Regarding above point, there are facts asserted, that are tagged with {{fact}}.
Page uses poor sources, see WP:RS, and specifically, WP:RS/IMDB.
Fails WP:NOTE, lacks significant coverage from multiple independent reliable secondary sources.

Those are a few to get you started. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 09:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What specifically fails the above? Misssinformative (talk) 09:57, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added some {{fact}} tags throughout. -- Cirt (talk) 10:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Misssinformative. Thank you. Fram (talk) 10:43, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Misssinformative, and you are therefore blocked indefinitely.
If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 19:15, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Misssinformative (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet. I honestly don't care whether my account is blocked or not, as the way you guys swoop in and edit and discredit my work is disheartening to say the least and this account probably will not be used again, but you should not be lumping me in with these other people or vice versa. So what if Emily has multiple fans who live in Toronto who want her article back on the site? So what if we talk to each other and maybe use the same internet service? Still does not mean we are the same person - we are not. The block is arbitrary, ultimately, and by discriminating against myself and others, you are both discouraging new users from working to improve the site, not to mention endorsing the cyber-bullying by those at Frozen North toward Emily. I am not Bytemeh, nor any of the others on that list, nor have any of my edits been vandalism or anything illegal.

Decline reason:

Technical and behavioral evidence contradict your story here. Jayron32 07:51, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I haven't in-depth reviewed this, but I did look at the sockpuppetry case. Look - no one here has an agenda against you; I'd even be glad to talk it over further with you. That said, what you described above is a classic case of meatpuppetry, which is basically you recruiting or being recruited by your friends. Under certain conditions, assuming your story is correct (which I'm not saying it is or isn't), you may be able to all edit, so long as you openly declare that you are affiliated. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:21, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]