User talk:Mishigas

Wikipedia is not a forum[edit]

Based on your edit to Talk:James Comey Senate Intelligence Committee testimony, I should tell you about this: WP:NOTFORUM.

Wikipedia talk pages are not forums used to talk about the subject of the article; rather, they are to be used to discuss improvements to the article.

Please read WP:NOTFORUM for more details. Thank you. SkyWarrior 03:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Comey Senate Intelligence Committee testimony[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that James Comey Senate Intelligence Committee testimony, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - James Comey. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at James Comey, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from James Comey Senate Intelligence Committee testimony, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. SkyWarrior 03:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with James Comey Senate Intelligence Committee testimony. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. SkyWarrior 03:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at James Comey Senate Intelligence Committee testimony, you may be blocked from editing. SkyWarrior 03:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at James Comey Senate Intelligence Committee testimony. SkyWarrior 03:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mishigas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Guan aco 03:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Comey Senate Intelligence Committee testimony[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that James Comey Senate Intelligence Committee testimony, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - James Comey. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at James Comey, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Comey Senate Intelligence Committee testimony. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. SkyWarrior 16:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mishigas, and welcome! You are new here, so there is a lot you need to learn.

WP:NOTFORUM Don't use the talk pages to express your own opinion. The talk pages are for discussing the content of the article.
WP:CANVAS Don't solicit for other editors to come to a discussion (such as an AfD) and vote in a particular way. Doing that could invalidate their "votes" and perhaps yours as well.
No personal attacks as explained above.

Please take the advice and warnings on this page and learn from other users who are advising you, and I'm sure you will become a productive editor here. --MelanieN (talk) 18:41, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. There are very few voters in that discussion, and most are invokved; the two who wanted to speedy delete it, and the one who voted to remove the delete tag, and then myself, and maybe one other guy/gal. Isn't there a way to solicit more votes before the discussion gets closed? I think this is an obvious notable topic, which garnered huge coverage and was billed as a major political event (we have individual articles on the super bowl even though we also have srticles on the season; individual prez debates, etc) and I haven't seen anyone explain why this is not a notable topic or the emcylopedia is somehow "harmed" by my article. Also, complaints about the article seem besides the point, since these can be changed. I also dislike this vting for "merge" BS since that basically means "delete". The options should be Keep/Delete.Mishigas (talk) 18:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge is substantially different because it doesn't involve the actual admin "delete" function. The article history is preserved in a merge, and in some cases the whole article is copied verbatim. Deletion means all your content is gone, and only admins have the power to recover it. —Guan aco 19:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mishigas, you are brand new here. This is your first day here, and your first experience editing Wikipedia. Please recognize that you don't know everything (or in some cases anything) about how this place works: how articles are selected for retention or deletion or redirect; what kind of posts are allowed at talk pages; what kind of material belongs in an article; what kind of references to use. In other words, listen to what people are telling you and be willing to learn. As for "soliciting more votes", the discussion is brand new; it will normally run for a week; it is listed at multiple WikiProjects, as well as on the general AfD page; people will find it, and they will comment. But for you to go around soliciting people to "go there and vote keep" is improper and could taint the whole process, so don't do that any more.

One other problem: you seem to have come here specifically to bash Trump. That is clear not only from your talk page posts, but even from your article. You are entitled to have private opinions, but your editing needs to respect Wikipedia's core value of WP:Neutrality. Some of the people discussing this article may hate Trump as much as you do, but they respect Wikipedia's neutrality and they try to edit in such a way that you can't even tell what they believe. That is my goal, and that is the goal of most long-term Wikipedians. --MelanieN (talk) 20:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump orb. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 06:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The same is true for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nine money personalities model. You force me to take a much closer look at your contribs. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 06:48, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for WP:HERE. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 06:49, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits range from mild vandalism to outright WP:NPOV violations. Simply put, you are not here to build an encyclopedia. All the puffery to trash Trump is just one example, but the totality of your contributions show an inability to function in a collaborative environment. Anyone who went through your contribs for just the last couple of days can see this. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 06:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No need to take it out on me just because your Fuhrer is about to get indicted for treason, friend.Mishigas (talk) 06:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mishigas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Trumpkin-cheerleader admin blocked me for disliking Trump. No reasons given. Is Wikipedia a fascist dictatorship? *Diffs I appear to have been blocked for: *https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Trump_orb&diff=prev&oldid=784813133 *https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nine_money_personalities_model&diff=prev&oldid=784812301 *Conclusion: lighten up, Emperor Dennis.

Decline reason:

Childish vandalism, trolling, and personal attacks against the blocking admin. No thanks.. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:36, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason isn't that you oppose Trump; I might hate him almost as much as you do. It's that every edit you've made has been to push an anti-Trump point of view. I'd like to have you stick around, but it would be best if you took a break from Trump-related areas and focused on topics where your bias shines through less brightly. —Guan aco 09:06, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would you still be interested in contributing to Wikipedia, if it meant avoiding modern political topics for a while? —Guan aco 09:15, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined the request. Given the history of trolling and personal attacks, I've also removed talkpage access so that no more valuable volunteer time is wasted. Mishigas, if you wish to appeal again, please do so through the Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System. I wouldn't bother if your appeal just consists of more of the same though. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]