User talk:Mischellemougly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CS1 error on Pampally[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pampally, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Midhun Asokan moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Midhun Asokan. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akshithmanya talk 11:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ranjin Raj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Night Drive. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Information icon

Hello Mischellemougly. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mischellemougly. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mischellemougly|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. gobonobo + c 08:15, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No way applicable to me. May I know which edit made you to think so ? Mischellemougly (talk) 09:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies then. We sometimes get undisclosed paid editing for people in the film industry. As it doesn't apply to you, please disregard. gobonobo + c 20:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ranjin Raj[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ranjin Raj, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for your message Mischellemougly (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Mischellemougly. Thank you for your work on A Ranjith Cinema. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DreamRimmer (talk) 03:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Will be adding reception section. Thank you for the suggestion. Mischellemougly (talk) 04:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rosemary Lillu for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosemary Lillu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemary Lillu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira (talk) 13:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Gautham Ramachandran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable Filmmaker

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and hello@Liz
I Dpd te page: GR does seem to meet the guideline for notability, as director of two notable films at least. Best wishes -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rosemary Lillu for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosemary Lillu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemary Lillu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anup Pandalam for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anup Pandalam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anup Pandalam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GSS💬 08:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Midhun Asokan[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mischellemougly. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Midhun Asokan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Jeraxmoira[edit]

Hello, Mischellemougly. You have new messages at Talk:Anup Pandalam.
Message added 06:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Midhun Asokan[edit]

Hello, Mischellemougly. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Midhun Asokan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]