User talk:Minimac/Archive2

Vandalism?

You "reverted" a change I made to an article about a norwegian musician (Susanne Sundfør), calling it vandalism. I fail to see how my change was vandalism, as I only added her most recent album to her discography. And I also see that the page is as I left it 88.89.5.109 (talk) 22:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Userpage Shield
		For reverting vandalism on my user page, I award you this barnstar. Even though you did it once, many other users would probably just ignore it. Thanks for protecting my user page! :) --Hadger 00:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Woo-Hoo! I got my first Barnstar! Thanks very much for giving it to me Hadger. Minimac94 (talk) 06:02, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Richard O'Shea article

Hi what is wrong with my external link to the interview with the Richard O'shea. You Tube links are not forbidden WP:YOUTUBE. The interview was posted to you tube by the (c) holder. The interview is extremely relevant and is not spam.--92.251.255.15 (talk) 13:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

I see it was reverted by XLinkBot because You-tube links are added on its blacklist, but then you undid this revision. Next time you try and undo an edit which leads to the appropriate link, could you remember explaining it in the edit summary? A lot of You tube links are forbidden but if you think this link is OK you could try reporting it here. Thanks. Minimac94 (talk) 13:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Minimac94, I am not going to list the link on User_talk:XLinkBot/RevertList because of point 3 on that page 3 Make the entry at the bottom of the list (before the last line). Please do not do this unless you are familiar with regex — the disruption that can be caused is substantial. I am not familiar with regex- sorry. But I definitely believe the link is fine--92.251.255.15 (talk) 13:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk

Do you really live in the U.K.?Nascar1996 (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

As you have agreed that you will not ever use Huggle [1] I have granted you access to rollback again. Please remember that it is only to be used to revert blatant vandalism and it goes without saying that any misuse of rollback will result in it being removed permanently. This also applies if you install/use Huggle again. Good luck & be careful - remember, "if in doubt, don't do it!" Best, Nancy ^talk 15:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

p.s. to prevent "accidental" use of Huggle I have blanked and protected User:Minimac94/huggle.css. Best, Nancy ^talk 15:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks so much Nancy! Minimac94 (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

FASTQ_format article

The diagram I added is quite helpful if you've ever had to determine a file's encoding by looking at the quality scores alone. I have distributed this chart among colleagues and thought Wikipedia would be a good place to share this. I'm surprised you reverted this. Can you explain why you did this? Jeberle (talk) 09:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Hmm... I don't remember reverting that at all... Thanks for reminding me anyway. I undid my revision for you. It was tagged as nonsense characters on the article's history, and I reverted it because it looked like intentional vandalism. Next time you make an edit similar to this could you explain it in the edit summary? That way it gets everyone (including me) to understand what the edit is about. Minimac94 (talk) 13:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

My vandalbox

First off, this is my vandalbox... second, the IP's edit was so large that it nearly crashed my browser, so I had to revert it... (I would like others to be able to use it without it crashing their browsers you know...) The Thing _{Vandalize me} 16:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh yes, it did take me a very long time to try and revert your edit! LOL! I shouldn't have done that reversion by you. Sorry. Minimac94 (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

The Block on Gantlet

I've realised you've blocked Gantlet for two weeks for edit warring (I think). Is it possible to extend the block because Gantlet has abused multiple accounts. His sock, User:Trock95 was blocked indefinitely. Minimac94 (talk) 19:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

I am well aware of the sock; I'm the one who blocked it. I'm sticking with two weeks. -- tariqabjotu 20:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

OK, no problem then, at least Gantlet's blocked. See you later. Minimac94 (talk) 22:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Re. RfA

You've stated that you would like to know why my first wikibreak came about. Is a private email okay? Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 10:24, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh, no, I meant through Special:EmailUser/Minimac94, which uses a private email address that you used to set up the wikipedia account. In any case, I'll do that now. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 10:29, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Unless you'd prefer I'd just use the email you've given out right now, you'd have to enable email in Your Preferences. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 10:32, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

I was a little concerned about giving away my e-mail address, but I removed it now, since you found a better way to do it, I'll take a look at My Preferences to see what my settings are at the moment. Minimac94 (talk) 10:34, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

An email detailing my wikibreaks has been sent to the email you indicate above. Hope this helps, Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 10:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

I've seen it, and you've answered my question. Good job! Minimac94 (talk) 10:41, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Glad I could clear up any confusion. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 10:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

1/4

I was trying to undo the 'dick' comments too, but you did it at the same time and I undid your's rather than the dick one. Cheers for being a generic Wikpeadia message sender, though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.251.221.211 (talk) 05:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi and thanks!

Just wanted to pop in and thank you for the warm welcome message! Keep up the good work! 85.76.80.10 (talk) 09:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

It's Barnstar Time!

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page 5 albert square (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

X-Factor edit war

Just wanted to apologize for seemingly overriding your revert - I was trying to revert to the same 'known good' revision, and picked the wrong one. Sorry about that. SpecMode (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

9th QRL

Hi, can you explain to me why the Sharnbrook ACF website should be regarded as a reliable source, it is effectively self-published and gives no indication where it obtained its information from. David Underdown (talk) 19:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Because it was the only source I could find on the Internet. Apologies if I got the source wrong. I think we should delete that quote as there is no significant source added to it. I do try my best to add {{vc}} to any reference I make in which the reliability would be in question. Minimac94 (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

9th Queen's Royal Lancers. The quote probably doesn't need to be deleted yet, the regimental history may well confirm it, or other published histories of the Boer War - sources don't have to be online. David Underdown (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

NPA

"Stubborn editor" is not a personal attack. Don't refactor anyone's comments ever.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Minimac usurp opportunity

Have you considered usurping the User:Minimac account ? –xeno^talk 16:40, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Usurp? Never came across that word before :P Anyway I would like to change my account name from Minimac94 to Minimac if possible. The 94 was a random number picked by Google when I had to choose a valid email address (Also, 94 is not my favourite number, so there isn't a point about that). The only question is do I have to do anything to change my account name or not? Minimac94 (talk) 17:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, you need to file a request at WP:USURP. –xeno^talk 17:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Unblock requests

re Unblock requests, why?--Jac16888^Talk 13:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Unblock requests

I have nominated Unblock requests (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jac16888^Talk 01:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

RE: Your speedy deletion tag to one of the articles.

I interpreted A1 a different way. Thanks for clearing that up NoisyJinx (talk) 17:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the nomination

Hi, thank you for the nomination, i appreciate it, and i will accept it, actually i was waiting for it, thank you again and am so grateful to you :-) MaenK.A._Talk 16:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

New section

We need a new section on Minimac94's profile to elaborate on your whorish, deviant and sodomitical activities. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.59.182 (talk) 17:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Participation at my RfA

Thank you for taking the time to weigh in on my RfA. It was successful, in that the community's wish not to grant me the tools at this time was honored. I'm taking all the comments as constructive feedback and hope to become more valuable to the project as a result; I've also discovered several new areas in which to work. Because debating the merits of a candidate can be taxing on the heart and brain, I offer this kitten as a low-allergen, low-stress token of my appreciation. --otherlleft 13:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism rollback notifications

I've seen some good rollback edits of yours but what I'm not seeing is you giving warnings out to other users. If you don't know how to give warnings let me know in advance. Thanks. Minimac94 (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. I've been using the ROLLBACK VANDALISM tool, and I was under the mistaken impression that it automatically did notifications. Is there a better tool, perhaps one that automatically adds the notifications?

Thanks

Pfranson (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

There is Huggle for you to try out. You have to be careful with it though, my rollback edits were removed because of bad use of it. Minimac94 (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Minimac's Clone

Hey there, I have just protected Minimac's Clone's userpage as per your request :). Best, Mifter (talk) 17:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Ana 20

Hi. I see you've requested protection of User:Ana 20. While I agree that the page is getting repeatedly blanked, I also note that the page contains a full name and date of birth. Given that the account is over three years stale, should at least some of that information be removed from the page? —C.Fred (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your RfA Support

Minimac/Archive2 - Thank for your participation and support in my recent successful RfA. Your confidence and trust in me is much appreciated. As a new admin I will try hard to keep from wading in too deep over the tops of my waders, nor shall I let the Buffalo intimidate me.--Mike Cline (talk) 08:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Fred Plotz

Yeah sorry, didn't even notice I changed it back. Regards!

Proposed deletion of Herb Heiman

The article Herb Heiman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Self-published author, no reliable sources to even come close to meeting notability guidelines for authors.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. tedder (talk) 03:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

List of Steam titles

Super Laser Racer has indeed been released through it today though I didn't know how to place it in the 2010 table so I just put there the information because I have no idea on how to work with the editor. I only did that so somebody could do that for me :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.132.42.76 (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Why did you remove several category tags about JACK audio support?

Hi Minimac! I saw you have removed several tags for Category:Audio software with JACK support. I'm not quite sure I understand why. There is an ongoing discussion about the deletion of that category (to which I object), but why are cat tags being deleted before there is consensus? Best regards, --Nettings (talk) 23:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

It was because on some articles I couldn't see any part of the article which had the word "JACK" in them, so I assumed it wasn't part of the category "Audio programs with JACK support". But if you think the article does have JACK support undo my removal of categories, but also please add them in the article somewhere so that I understand this category. I see you are an audio engineer, so my apologies for removing your categories without permission. Minimac (talk) 05:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Ah, ok. I can assure you those applications do indeed support JACK. The category was created to avoid a long and unwieldy list of supporting applications on the JACK page. I'm going to wait how the deletion discussion turns out, and if people decide to keep the category, I'll restore those tags, if you don't mind.--Nettings (talk) 10:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Duke of la Torre

I have added some sources in the article Duke of la Torre. Are they enough for removing the unreferenced template? Thank you --Paliano (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, although I might have to change the template to the {{nofootnotes}} because it doesn't have any inline citations (i.e. sources from newspapers or anything else published). If you can find any news related sources, this article wouldn't be a concern. You could try Google News or any other news related browser to help you on this. Minimac (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

All right!! I'll try to look for some. Thank you again --Paliano (talk) 21:00, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Marm Vonhamstein

Hello Minimac. I am just letting you know that I deleted Marm Vonhamstein, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

I didn't know it was vandalism. I swear it wasn't just vandalism. I still think that it's a non-notable person. Minimac (talk) 11:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Removed PROD on List of terrorist incidents in the Republic of Ireland

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from List of terrorist incidents in the Republic of Ireland, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!

As this is a relatively new article, and as lists go, fairly well organized I think due consideration should be given to WP:BEFORE before this one is considered for the Axe.--Mike Cline (talk) 15:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

CrossFit

Hi Minimac,

As you have no doubt discovered, I've been working hard to clean up CrossFit. I am completely neutral on this topic and just interested in fixing the problems with this article. After my substantial rewrite, I see that you restored a couple of tags I removed at the top of the page, which in turn reference unspecified conversations on the talk page. I'd really like to clean things up so these aren't necessary, but I can find no specific conversations on the talk page that relate to the page in its current form, and therefore am unable to fix the problems that warrent the inclusion of these tags. Could you please clarify -- preferably in a new section on the article's talk page? Or better yet, just remove or revise the offending content. Thanks! Lambtron (talk) 16:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Another issue: you changed "is intended to promote" to "promotes". I changed it to "intended to promote" because that appears to be its actual purpose, but not always the result as exemplified by its various health risks. Lambtron (talk) 16:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

I tried to help out too, but I think I know what happened: I think there was an edit conflict between one of your edits and one of my edits: I re-added the two maintenance templates after there was a weasel word that I placed, whilst you removed the unpredictable statement that I tagged. So I apologise if I've done anything wrong or unnecessary. I hope this answers your question. Minimac (talk) 16:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

And in response to the other issue: We probably need some evidence from a reference to support the statement, for example the official website or any published sources or something like that. I don't know much about CrossFit, since I just bumped in to a random page. Minimac (talk) 16:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

In light of this editing "collision", do you think it's reasonable to once again remove the maintenance templates? Lambtron (talk) 17:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

OK, Go ahead then. I understand how much hard work you've done to the article. Minimac (talk) 17:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Cookie

I'm really the 5000th? Wow, cool. The rights are being used for anti-vandal purposes, so it's being put to good use.

Cody574 has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Cody⁵⁷⁴ 03:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sighthound Disc Sport

Hello Minimac. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sighthound Disc Sport, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Verified by OTRS. Thank you. The Wordsmith^Communicate 04:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Eric Wang

Hello, I declined the speedy deletion as it asserts significance with national titles and what not. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 14:58, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

a bit too keen and enthusiastic

I realize that it makes you feel important patrolling newly created pages, but could you please desist until the page is finished. I thank you Norwikian (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Which page are you talking about? I can't remember. Minimac (talk) 03:51, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Excessive Edit warring in Kochi article

The user:Gantlet is again edit warring with the article Kochi. He is reverting the article to an older version. Please block him again. He is even having some sock usernames as well. Also, please dont include me also in the same category. I was just trying to prevent him from his wierd revisions. Please see the history here: [2] Thank you, --Dewatchdog (talk) 16:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I'm not an administrator, so I can't block any users. Try either asking someone else or taking this to the Admins' noticeboard. Minimac (talk) 18:47, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK query

Hi Minimac, I've raised a query over your use of "but" in your DYK hook. Regards, Ericoides (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

RAPT system

Hey, I'm trying to get Mike (talk) to help me out. If you can that would be great too. Thanks,

Johnnywes05 —Preceding undated comment added 21:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC).

Marina Orlova

What on earth possessed you to seek edit protection for an article where the only dispute was an entirely civil discussion about the content? There has been no edit warring and the discussion was essentially resolved before the protection was even imposed. Might you have asked first? bd2412 T 02:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, there was a dispute earlier on, involving Off2riorob and Sinistrial as I saw in the history box. I don't really care how "civil" the discussion is, but if I see a large edit war I seek protection usually. I may have asked later than I should, but if you think the dispute was resolved you can try requesting unprotection for it. Minimac (talk) 05:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I came in at the tail end and mistakenly thought the dispute at issue was my interaction with Off2riorob (which is the discussion to which the protecting admin appended his comment). bd2412 T 23:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Susanne Sundfør

Hello Minimac!

Just wanted to note that I have reverted your most recent contribution to Susanne Sundfør, as the edit by the IP did not constitute vandalism. Regards, decltype (talk) 19:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I was thinking that this wasn't vandalism, but the word "Brothel" triggered the abuse filter, so it made the edit questionable. I did leave a note in that message saying "If this is a mistake report it on my talk page" here. Minimac (talk) 20:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I see. Well, mistakes happen. decltype (talk) 20:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Thai Roong Ruang Sugar Group speedy declined

Asserts significance w/ "the TRR Group is a leading sugar manufacturer and exporter in Thailand, and has the longest experience in sugar production in the country". Cheers, Dlohcierekim 23:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

one of three Google News hits (remarkable, as the subject is in Thailand) calls it the "the nation's second-largest miller." I generally look for a way to improve an article before I delete. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 23:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Editor Review: done

I have done an editor review for you at Wikipedia:Editor review/Minimac/Archive2. Perhaps you could consider doing a review of another editor? It takes a bit of time (reviews can take anywhere from about 15 minutes up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, where they have contributed, etc). The ones marked with a * are those editors who have not been reviewed yet — if you want to review one of these, make sure you remove the asterisks in the parts indicated! If you have not done a review before, you might feel more comfortable giving a second review to an editor — this will show you an example of a review that has been done, and show you the kinds of things that can be commented on. I hope that you find the review useful. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about it. Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 13:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

igloo

I've added you to the igloo whitelist, and if you now run the script it should allow you to connect. Let me know if you have any problems. Thanks, Ale_Jrb^talk 11:13, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

It appears that igloo doesn't like the apostrophe in your other account's name. I should have it fixed at some point in the near future. Sorry. Ale_Jrb^talk 17:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

For your reference, this is now fixed - you should be able to use igloo with either of your accounts. Ale_Jrb^talk 18:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

OK, igloo works under my main account, but not the cloned account, maybe because of that apostrophe mistake again. :P Minimac (talk) 20:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Herts

Hi, just noticed you were in Herts and will be of drinking age in a few days. So I thought you might like to know about the second Sunday meetups. ϢereSpielChequers 13:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, I don't usually go to those socially interactive public places, but it's interesting that you found one for me to look at. I'll have to speak to my parents about this. Minimac (talk) 14:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Sum of 12 consecutive primes

Why is being the sum of 12 consecutive primes notable? Why not 11? 13? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

OK, I'll put them in for your sake in a couple of minutes. Minimac (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I'll comment further at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#Sum of n consecutive primes. Please comment there. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Agrimonia gryposepala

Hello! Your submission of Agrimonia gryposepala at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 08:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

"spam link"

the audio link had expired and I replaced it with a youtube link. I thought that was good... can you please explain me what I did wrong?(Umumu (talk) 16:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC))

I reverted your edit because a link to youtube is not within our policy on External links, but my revert also removed some internal links. Just to let you know I've undone my edit. Minimac (talk) 16:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for adding back my edits . (Umumu (talk) 16:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC))

DYK for Agrimonia gryposepala

On 28 March, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Agrimonia gryposepala, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

removed incorrect message

No. I meant it The use of fake edit summaries is not a mistake allowing any doubt in the user's intent. The misleading edits summaries raise this to the level of blatant vandalasim. This is one of the rare instances that a repetition of such an act removes any ability to AGF and requires immediate blocking, not to punish, but to protect the project . Thanks. Dlohcierekim 17:31, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

And you did not leave a "correct" warning? Dlohcierekim 17:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

OK, I put this user on Level 2 instead of an only warning. Minimac (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

No prob. As a suggestion, I sometimes use {{{subst:welcomevandal}}}. It sets limits while pointing in a positive manner the way to expectations of constructive behavior. Cheers, Dlohcierekim

Regarding the entry on Shin Ebihara

I am now adding some references. Johnkatz1972 (talk) 18:12, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Re re

I've taken off your prod and put a db-attack on it, it looks like an attack page, to me. As well as a target for vandals. Woogee (talk) 20:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pxixtreme

An article that you have been involved in editing, Pxixtreme, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pxixtreme. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Closeapple (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Adolescents and cartoon violence

I have concerns about the synthesis and quality of sources. Might wanna check. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Timber-Lee Christian Center

Hello, I noticed you changed my CSD tag on that one to a prod. While the article does have references these are all primary sources and do not assert notability or importance in my eyes. We could leave it at prod but I think that's a bit much of procedure. One could even go as far and call the article spammy. De728631 (talk) 20:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

I recently put up the maintenance tags up, with the notability added. Minimac (talk) 20:05, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Morris Jeppson

I just wanted to clarify that his person has indeed died, but the newspapers have been slow to pick it up because it most likely has not been released beyond family members. I am one of his grandsons. One other person, who is a part of his second wife's family attempted some edits as an unregistered user. I'm watching news sources closely for any signs of an announcement, but have yet not seen any. Davidpdx (talk) 05:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

That's fine. I was just too aggressive reverting the IP's edits because there was no reference to confirm his death, plus this IP made a few vandalism edits too, so some of my reverts were OK. Anyway, Problem sorted, thanks for notifying me about this. Minimac (talk) 06:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

ACC

Hi, Minimac. Can you please confirm that you requested an account in ACC so that I can approve it? Thanks, Pmlineditor ∞ 08:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) As Phantomsteve recently declined my request, I have requested an account to the Account creation interface. I have registered and seen the welcome message a few minutes ago. Minimac (talk) 08:44, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

You need to be approved to create users, which I have  Done now. Welcome to the team! Pmlineditor ∞ 08:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)