User talk:Mikesclark

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.

Main Introduction — What is Wikipedia?
The Five Pillars — What are the principles behind Wikipedia?
Quick Introductions to:

Policies and guidelines — How does Wikipedia actually work?
Talk pages — How do I communicate in Wikipedia?
Referencing — How do I add sources to articles?
Uploading images — How do I add and use images?
Navigating Wikipedia — How do I find my way around?

What Wikipedia is not - even though everyone can edit it, Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.

Where next?[edit]

If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page should be your next stop!

Constance Crawley[edit]

Hello! Good job with this article, especially for a relative newcomer! You need to add references to your sources in the text, as you go, to verify the facts; don't wait to list them at the bottom of the article. Please go ahead and add in the references to the text where I've indicated when you have a moment. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding more citations. Of course more are still needed. Why did you remove these two? (You had originally added them to the article):

"Constance Crawley Plays the Difficult Role With Much Grace", The San Francisco Call, September 26, 1904, p. 12; and
"Constance Crawley: Idealist: Wonderful English Actress Wins Reward of Artistic Labors", Fort Wayne Journal-Gazetter, December 26, 1909, p. 13

Don't they report on roles that she played in 1904 and 1909? BTW, do you know the author's name for the two articles? All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:13, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the article is looking good! -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Williams family of painters, Mikesclark!

Wikipedia editor FreeRangeFrog just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Beautiful article!

To reply, leave a comment on FreeRangeFrog's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

WikiProject[edit]

Hi Mikesclark! You might enjoy joining Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geology. Hope to see more of your contributions! all the best! --Tobias1984 (talk) 11:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

I nominated an article which you started for DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Magdalene (1914 film). I'm impressed. SL93 (talk) 18:22, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nice CA maps/xsecs[edit]

	The Geology Barnstar
	{{{1}}}

Just noticed you were the source for, eg

Nice work! Best, --Pete Tillman (talk) 15:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC), another old geologist, new to CA[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stanley Frederick Hill[edit]

The article Stanley Frederick Hill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As a junior commissioned officer with a MC and bar, doesn't meet WP:SOLDIER. No sign of meeting WP:GNG. Also WP:NOTMEMORIAL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mikesclark. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of One Good Turn (1951 film)[edit]

The article One Good Turn (1951 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. A basic WP:BEFORE search does not turn up significant coverage, only the basic information of release year, cast and crew, and so on from the BFI website and some trivial mentions in lists of actors' filmographies. Not to be confused with several other films bearing the same title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TompaDompa (talk) 23:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of One Good Turn (1951 film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Good Turn (1951 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Good Turn (1951 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TompaDompa (talk) 13:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]