User talk:Mikeblas/Archives/2021/April

Irish Americans edit summary

@Mikeblas: Apologies. I did not realize that I removed the aliased reference for the Glazier encyclopedia from the Irish Americans article. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 20:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

No worries! Please do double-check that I made the right fix, tho. -- Mikeblas (talk) 22:31, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Blue Nile patas monkey

I disagree! The sources are not about this monkey, someone is just making stuff up here! 86.83.56.115 (talk) 22:28, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

It would be best to discuss this on the Talk page of the article in question. That way, anyone interested in the changes can participate instead of just us. -- Mikeblas (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Sure, go for it. But this a pretty slam-dunk case. Article is about A, source is about B, you cannot make a claim about A based on a source about B. For example: A. penguins are birds, B. humans wear dresses and work in finance =this doesn't mean we can claim penguins wear dresses or can work in finance. Apparently you disagree, thus reverted my improvements, hence I am here convincing you penguins don't wear dresses... I'm assuming most people already know this... 86.83.56.115 (talk) 02:49, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Not sure what's going on here -- I never said I agree or disagree. -- Mikeblas (talk) 22:32, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Appreciate you

In humility, thank you for pointing out the error I made and I do appreciate you fixing it. Raffybund (talk) 01:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

No worries! It's not about humility -- I just want to make sure that when I fix something, the original author has a chance to double double check check the fix I made. Maybe I misunderstood their intent, or didn't implement the best possible solution. -- Mikeblas (talk) 01:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Derecho

There was a problem with the damage section where it didn’t showed the word costliest fully and I tired too edit it. But thanks for readjusting it Colin777724 (talk) 04:48, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

2020–21 Serie C Group C Table

Hi, in October 2020 you have replaced undefined references with fact tags in this page [1]. I've recently replaced it with the official statement from Lega Pro which attests the rules for classification. It is located in the template of Group A table. Why isn't it ok?--Iennandrea (talk) 09:32, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

your edit uses a reference named "figc", which is not defined in the template. You can see the visible error message in the template's references section: "Cite error: The named reference figc was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." That error was also appearing in the articles which used this template. -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)