User talk:Mikeblas/Archives/2018/June
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Many thanks
Hi, I'd really appreciated it if you didn't mention and link me in edit summaries - if there's a disagreement then talk page if really necessary, when trivial fix really not helpful or (frankly) collegiate. I'm sure you don't mean it to be rude but it comes across as WAY too much, so please, just merge the refs and have done with it. Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:52, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Most people are appreciative, but I'll try to remember your special request and do as you wish. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:10, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- You may believe that "most people are appreciative". I would like to know on what you base that. I find your edit summaries rather rude. Please add me to your "special list" and do consider whether your approach is as appreciated as you imagine. (Oh and I wasn't pinged by Chiswick Chap but arrived here at the same time by chance. But pinging @Chiswick Chap: so he can see that I agree with him. Victuallers (talk) 20:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Misattribution
Hi Mike,
In this edit summary: [1], you misattributed a problem to me. The only edit I have ever made to the relevant page was ten years ago and had nothing to do with the edit you made. If there is a way for you to correct this, I'd appreciate your doing so; otherwise, I join Chiswick Chap and Victuallers in requesting that you not mention me in edit summaries. Best regards, Tkynerd (talk) 13:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oops! Indeed, the referencing error was introduced in an edit by @PRasmussen:, made just before your edit on 2008-04-29. Sorry about that; I was just looking at the diff in the wrong direction. The good news is that a citation problem in the article is finally fixed, after ten years of waiting. -- Mikeblas (talk) 13:59, 19 June 2018 (UTC)