User talk:Mascarponette

Template:Exchange rate[edit]

http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/transfermate.com Global rank icon 148,495 106,301 Rank in India India Flag 13,814

http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/transferwise.com Global Rank Global rank icon 6,530 3,358 Rank in United Kingdom United Kingdom Flag 668

How could you lie transfermate is not even listed in alexarank...

Hello, Have a look at WP:NPA, it seems I made a mistake in the name of these domains (I put an extra "t"), but I didn't lie, anyway these sites don't bring any value added for the project and we can't put thousands of external links. Have a nice dayMascarponette (talk) 08:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of WP:NPA, I've been away from Wikipedia for a while but I resent you accusing me of being a sock puppet - I've been an editor for over 10 years now. Reverting my edit without any justification was really uncalled for. Ed Mercer (talk) 15:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding spam on template:exchange[edit]

I accidentally submitted same question on user page (not sure how to remove it), anyway I notice my edits for Currency.Wiki has been removed https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Exchange_rate&action=history and it has nothing to do with transwerwise and/or transfermate. Would you be kind to return/revert my changes back since it is now protected by CambridgeBayWeather. Thanks, Tomdavis1 (talk) 04:12, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits on my user page. Let's talk about currency.Wiki issue on on Template talk:Exchange rate Mascarponette (talk) 11:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that! Thank you for taking a positive approach to revert the changes but for some reason I don't see my contribution (conversion links) for currency.wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Exchange_rate

Thank you! Tomdavis1 (talk) 17:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mascarponette, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 09:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 220 of Borg, my account was created in 2011, I'm not that new !Mascarponette (talk) 09:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

75 edits is pretty new! But you had not been 'officially' welcomed, so I did it.

--220 of ^Borg 09:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Apoorva Shah[edit]

Re your CSD tagging of this page, I think lack of wp:Notability may have been a better reason for deletion. 8 references is actually pretty good for a first time WP:BLP by a new editor.

It's advisable to inform the page creator of your action. I have done so here. Regards, 220 of ^Borg 09:23, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I put a message on this talk page but not about that, sorry.Mascarponette (talk) 09:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When you have enough edits you can use WP:Twinkle, which does it for you. 220 of ^Borg 13:05, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you I added this gadget and can see related tab. Mascarponette (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Hello Mascarponette. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mascarponette. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mascarponette|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm very surprised of such warning, I'm not paid for any of my edit, Regards Mascarponette (talk) 17:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]