User talk:Marhadiasa
Contributing[edit]
Hello Marhadiasa, how are you? I just saw on WP Indonesia talk page that you are having problems editing. Well, firstly, I don't think I am a good editor, but the way I do it is, I put my own knowledge to the article and at the same time, "googling" the web. When you start writing an article, there must be some points when there are sparks. You can use these sparks to get a particular idea or point and find more about it. After that, choose other point and dig into is as well. I usually use books from the university library or Google scholar, or just Google. Sometimes I also ask my grandmother :P. Let me know if you need help. Cheers -- Imoeng 11:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
2006 Hengchun earthquake[edit]
Per WP:CITE, can you cite your contribution please? Thanks. --Pinay (talk•email) 18:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- It took that long? Really? Goodness. Thanks for the info. --Pinay (talk•email) 18:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: Thank you for your effort."[edit]
Well, yes, I am sorry for having to revert you, but as you noticed, the table format, while may be visually appealing, it makes it really hard to work with. It is already hard to use the references to also have to deal with tables at the same time. Feel free to ask in the talk page to see if someone else agrees with the change. And be sure, there will be many, many times when your changes will be discarded. I must have thousands of changes that are not in the current versions anymore. But such is the way it is, isn't it? -- ReyBrujo 17:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- It is not "admin" task. Lists are awful, indeed, and maybe you can consider joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Laundromat. But in this case, with so many references, the list is a better option than a table because of the limitations of the table and pipes. Prose is not necessary because there is nothing to explain, it is just a ranking. Don't worry, something will be cleaned, but right now, tables make the references too messy. -- ReyBrujo 17:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Indonesia collaboration[edit]
- New collaboration...
Hello everybody. I’ve updated the current Indonesia collaboration to > > > Central Java < < <
This article’s not in a very good condition but such a significant part of Indonesia, the cultural heart of the Javanese. Please contribute! Thanks to all those contributed to the previous collaboration Sidoarjo mud flow particularly Indon.
- The next collaboration...
For the next collaboration in a fortnight, I’d like to try something different. Let’s chose a stub rather than an already well-developed article. Here is a list of Indonesian stubs to choose (there’s two pages). Please check the article's importance rating – let's chose an important and significant article that will appeal to a broad range of people. Please do not choose an obscure and/or esoteric topic that is not very important. Please place your nomination here.
Any questions, please let me know. Kind regards --Merbabu 05:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Striking your vote[edit]
Hello Marhadiasa,
Thank you for your interest in the Wikimedia Board Election. The Election Committee regretfully informs you that your previous vote was received in error and will be struck according to the election rules, described below.
The Election Committee regretfully announces today that we will have to remove approximately 220 votes submitted. These votes were cast by people not entitled to vote. The election rules state that users must have at least 400 edits by June 1 to be eligible to vote.
The voter lists we sent to Software in the Public Interest (our third party election partner) initially were wrong, and one of your account was eventually included to our initial list. There was a bug in the edit counting program and the sent list contained every account with 201 or more edits, instead of 400 or more edits. So large numbers of people were qualified according to the software who shouldn't be. The bug has been fixed and an amended list was sent to SPI already.
Our first (and wrong) list contains 80,458 accounts as qualified. The proper number of qualified voters in the SPI list is now 52,750. As of the morning of July 4 (UTC), there are 2,773 unique voters and 220 people, including you, have voted who are not qualified based upon this identified error.
In accordance with voting regulations the Election Committee will strike those approximately 220 votes due to lack of voting eligibility. The list of struck votes is available at https://wikimedia.spi-inc.org/index.php/List_of_struck_votes.
We are aware of the possibility that some of the people affected may have other accounts with more than 400 edits, and hence may still be eligible to vote. We encourage you to consider voting again from another account, if you have one. If you have no other account eligible to vote, we hope you reach the criteria in the next Election, and expect to see your participation to the future Elections.
Your comments, questions or messages to the Committee would be appreciated, you can make them at m:Talk:Board elections/2007/en. Other language versions are available at m:Translation requests/Eleccom mail, 07-05.
Again, we would like to deeply apologize for any inconvenience.
Sincerely,
Kizu Naoko
Philippe
Jon Harald Søby
Newyorkbrad
Tim Starling
For Wikimedia Board Election Steering Committee
Album reviews[edit]
Hi there. I just came across your recent edit to the In Rainbows article and wanted to point out that WikiProject Albums' guidelines state that: "The link should display as the year that the review was published. If you can not find the year of publication, the word link will suffice." [1]. I assume you didn't know about this policy and suggest you read that page before you decide to work on other album-related articles. Thank you. --Emc² • contact me 13:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
I think there's a word missing from your recent edit to the above article. I'm just not exactly sure which word would fit best. --Sturm 15:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's ok, I think I've fixed it. --Sturm 17:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)