User talk:MareBG

Speedy deletion nomination of Block 45

Hello MareBG,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Block 45 for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Blokovi#Block_45.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Zoupan 04:56, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Čola

Zaustavi ove što sprečavaju da se Čola nazove srpskim pjevačem. Nakon što sam pristao na kompromis da u uvodu stoji kako sad stoji (bez jugoslovenski je ali nema veze, u budućnosti će biti Bosnian-born Yugoslav-Serbian po smrti pjevača jer tada će obje odrednice i jug. i srp. biti jednako bitne), neki opet uklanjaju unapređenja članka odnosno napomene i brišu ćiriličko ime te stavljaju da je bosanski a nije više jer odabrao je da živi u Srbiji (a uz to je i etnički Srbin iz Sarajeva). Hvala. --5.43.77.235 (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Позориште Сент Џејмс

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Позориште Сент Џејмс, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 15:46, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Re: Мапа

I'll fix it as soon as possible, probably in the next few days. Thanks for noticing me on this.--AirWolf ^talk 17:49, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

OK, I see that you have reverted it to "working" version, thanks.--AirWolf ^talk 17:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Categories

Hello Mare. I see that you, from time to time, add numerous categories to Belgrade articles. One editor removed your Palilula category from Pančevači Rit, asking why is this category added there. Do you know is there any reason why is this category a problem in this article, or it should be restored? Take care PajaBG (talk) 23:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Ајде да те не мучим са енглеским :) Мислим да је у реду да се постави категорија Палилула на страницу јер је цео рит у саставу те општине. Питао сам да ли можда знаш на коју смерницу је мислио када је избрисао категорију, има ли неко правило по коме та категорија не би могла да се примени на рит. Да знам како може да се узврати ако буде био тврдоглав. PajaBG (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Видим ја, објашњаваш ми шта је Панчевачки рит :) Па како би се тек збунио да му неко каже да два дела Београда спаја ПАНЧЕВАЧКИ мост... PajaBG (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Port of Belgrade

Поздрав Маре. Налетео сам на чланак о Луци Београд овде - Port of Belgrade, и видим да од седам слика, ниједна није слика Луке Београд. Она у инфобоксу и првих пет с лева у галерији су са Савског пристаништа а прва здесна је са Мале Циганије, на новобеоградској страни. Знаш ли некога ко има добре слике луке, да се замене. Ако их нема (оно што сам нашао на Викимедији није нешто), заменио бих ону у инфобоксу са, на пример овом [1] (бар за сада), а галерију бих морао да обришем. Да не испаднем неки намћор који иде и брише. PajaBG (talk) 14:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Па ако ћеш у скорије време да сликаш луку, нећу онда ништа сад да дирам. Заменићемо кад учиташ слике. Поздрав. PajaBG (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Regarding your change on Serbia - Join TP-Discussion

Greetings,

I have seen that you have made an edit on Serbia. Though it bothers me. You didnt really explain the removal and it makes it seem like, you're supporting a specific Viewpoint. + The Word was there since years and is not a recent addition. So you have no point with the comment you gave on the Edit/Revert.

Coincidental, a dispute over the Word is currently ongoing on Talk:Serbia. Please join it if you still feel like the sentence has to be changed. Until a concensus is found thru the discussion, please refrain from editing the sentence in question again. Best Regards,--InNeed95 (talk) 12:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Behavior on Serbia

Excuse me but comments such as “ Your edits are not looking good” is uncalled for. I literally reverted myself at first. However it was not “personal views” but the fact that the camps Wikipedia page states it was aimed at primarily Jews by the German SS, not as a mechanism for Genocide of Serbs. Hence why I reverted my self again. It being located on in NDH does not automatically make it part of the Genocide of Serbs. Ustashe waged that not the SS. “ Your edits are not looking good” I can say likewise and is noticed. I will assume a misunderstanding in this claim for now. OyMosby (talk) 12:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 18:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)