User talk:Manbumper

Welcome!

Hello, Manbumper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

==References==

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Thanks and welcome to Wikipedia.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:41, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Your recent editing history at Joan Juliet Buck shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Note that the IP is pretty clearly you, so this is your 3rd revert Dougweller (talk) 07:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A second warning on the same for BLP violations. Don't take out content just becuase you don't like the subject matter. Work on subject matter you like or risk being blocked from Wikipedia--Aichikawa (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Your rudeness[edit]

"if you had bothered to read it" is unacceptable language. Actually I read it from start to finish. "This article is based on the expert witnesses who testified in the “Forgery Trial” and mainly on the 475 pages of the meticulous verdict of Judge Aharon Farkash". That's not a new investigation. Read the conclusions section for confirmation. Zero^talk 11:30, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]