This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
You're welcome, you seem to know your way around here and I think you can be trusted with the tools. And congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 21:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
+1! Congrats! Keeperǀ76 21:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to the club (but don't swing it too vigorously at the start)! LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations mate, glad you'll be following the advice I gave :) —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 21:11, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! Ecoleetage (talk) 21:29, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! Cirt (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Best of luck and you're welcome. HidingT 21:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 3781 last month to 4005 on August 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 25 out of a total number of 1664 articles. In the area of GAs, at 17, WP:YORKS falls behind WP:GM with 27 and WP:LONDON with 22.
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members
Yorkshire Portal
The Yorkshire portal helps people navigate through the content related to Yorkshire. The highlighted content is displayed randomly and includes -
Did you Knows
Articles
Biographies
Pictures
Panoramas
Any additions to these would be great. The portal is being prepared for featured portal candidacy so help meeting the criteria, for example, copy-editing or suggestions for new content sections such as Selected anniversaries, On this day, or In the news would be appreciated.
Priority Articles
The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Please remember...
The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitor Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Infoboxes Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.
The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.
References Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Delivered September 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add two *'s by your username on the Project Mainpage.
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Your RFA
Belated congratulations, and it was my pleasure! Jayjg (talk) 01:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Scott Carson
Thanks for your hard work also. I must admit I didn't do as much I'd intended on it today but looks like you've covered pretty much everything off and the article is looking very good now. Once the peer review closes I'll give you another shout and maybe we can give it another read through before putting up for GA. I'll keep an eye out for any further PR comments in the meantime. Cheers again. --Jameboy (talk) 21:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
David Andrew Smith may be notable, but I thought people weren't supposed to write whole articles about themselves on Wikipedia. What would be the proper course of action? —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
And if you are so inclined, please look at User:Suntag/Sandbox. {{db-g8}} applies if the page is not useful to the project. If any of these article space sandboxes have not been edited in eight months or longer, it seems safe to say they are not useful to the project. Any ones you choose to not db-g8, I'll look at and see whether they should be MfD'd. Thanks. Suntag (talk) 02:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Deletion
You recently deleted my autobiography called Jacob Houston and i went to the store and saved it but when i came back it was gone. Can i have a copy of the page so i can at least finish it? thnx --AlexisMe (talk) 23:48, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes i know but i wasnt finished when i saved like i said i had 2 run to the store and it was storming outside. i didnt want to lose my work. thnx thow --AlexisMe (talk) 00:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
No problem. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Pax Baldwin
Hi, would it be possible for you to move a copy of the now deleted Pax Baldwin article into my userspace? It'll probably take me a while to get to it and I know it'll probably end up being a complete re-write, but I'd like to be able to work on improving it for later re-inclusion :) Thanks. Frickative 22:26, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. 1st for tidying my talk page and second for making my Jake Cake better. Did you save it from deletion? Anyway your a legend. A++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ wikipedian. Thank you very much the page looks much better now and more proffesional. Many thanks again. King regards. (I hope you appretiate my comment) many thanks again. Please leave a comment on my talk page. Thank you. Legend8127 (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Ok m8 I'll set a page up called Micheal Broard and we'll both work on it. We'll both work on Jake Cake too. I'm gonna ask for the books so I can read them and edit Jake Cake then. I dont know how to make a sandbox but thanks for the suggestion. Kind regards Legend8127 (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
You recently deleted the beginning of my page on a person who is WIDELY considered a legend of the East Coast surfing scene, and who mentored many of today's leading surfboard shapers (and continues to do so). I began the stub with the intention of quickly adding additional information to it, and posted user talk explaining the position (which was apparently ignored).
While he may not have international significance, neither does a similar namesake "Murray G. Ross" (founder of Toronto's York University)...a figure probably completely unknown outside of that particular university, whose entry has been in Wikipedia for some time.
Since wikipedia's (or your) policy on who is and is not "significant" is clearly arbitrary (I could find a thousand persons linked here with less significance than Murray Ross (surfing), plese feel free to delete my account entirely as I have no plans on putting any additional effort into adding information into this so-called "knowledge base."
In short, continue with your little club here, and have fun shaping the world in which you see it, regardless of how other people may see it.
Both teams without a shirt sponsor - must be a first in the Premier League? I guess it is a sign of the economic times. I'm worried that all the West Ham boys will be up for it tomorrow to impress the new boss, but hopefully we can register our first win of the season. Good work on Lomana LuaLua by the way, a potential Good Article I reckon. Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 20:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you declined the speedy on this page on the basis that it was most probably a bad translation. That does seem likely now I look at the link to (what I think is) Chinese wikipedia. The problem I have is that due to the nature of the subject, a paralympic athlete, there are very few sources available and thus most of the jumbled information in there would be impossible to work out or verify. The only part that may be rescueable is the info on the 2008 Paralympics and a list of medals from earlier games. I'm willing to have a go at cleaning it up but it would probably involve stripping it bac to something like Heath Francis. Is this an acceptable solution? Basement12(T.C) 23:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. Yes, that will be fine. This chap seems to have had a long competitive career going back to Atlanta in 1996 so it worth trying to clean it up, I think. It is indeed the Chinese wiki that is linked, these translations may be helpful[4][5]. You may need to check the name, it may have lost something in the transliteration to English. Kind regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:06, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
I thought you'd like to know that i've finished my work on the article, it now looks quite respectable, and have also nominatd it for DYK. - Basement12(T.C) 02:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Excellent! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Riverside High School
Thankyou very much. Aaroncrick (talk) 11:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
The speedy seletion tag has been removed from the "David Gentili" page. I want to assure you that this article is being expanded to meet Wikipedia's standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joemaclellan (talk • contribs) 18:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Andy King
Why have you deleted Andy King's Page when he is a legit person?Phenom V1.0 (talk) 22:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thanks for clearing that.Phenom V1.0 (talk) 09:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Matthew A. Rosa
I received permission on the talk page to keep the page going for some more time to expand though you just went ahead and deleted the page. Is there any way to reverse this? The ID of the person who helped me were SIS and Nick, I believe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkkid12 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 4005 last month to 4085 on September 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 28 out of a total number of 1678 articles. In the area of GAs, at 21, WP:YORKS also falls behind WP:GM with 28.
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members
Wikipedia DVD version 0.7
Wikipedia DVD Version 0.7 aims to be a collection of around 30,000 articles taken from the English version of Wikipedia.
The process of producing the list of articles for the DVD is currently under way and 43 of the project's articles are being
considered for inclusion. The list of selected Yorkshire articles can be seen here.
The selection has been done using a scoring system depending on the project's assessment, the number of incoming links to the article, the number of interwiki
links the article has and the number of times the article has been viewed.
The process of selecting clean versions for each of the selected articles is also being undertaken so that vandalised versions are not put on the DVD.
Some of the articles also have clean-up tags attached to them which need to be dealt with before a version can be used on the DVD. It would be good if members
could address any tags in the selected articles and fix the problem identified. Those articles that are tagged by multiple projects should get a visit by each of the projects involved
so the articles will probably get a lot of activity in the next few days.
The cut-off date for this work is October 20th, but changes to articles following version selection may not be incorporated as there may not be time to reassess them.
Please remember...
The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitor Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Infoboxes Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.
The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.
References Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Delivered October 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Vandal Revert
I've fixed some vandalism on your user page. It seems like you've made a friend. I've also corrected the overlap that was there, but I can revert that if you'd like. Cheers! TN‑X-Man 19:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Can I ask what I can do to make my article show it's significance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlaBlaBlogMovies (talk • contribs) 22:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello, sir. Thank you very much for your work on the article Garrey Dawson. I would like to inform you, however, that I have plenty more articles to create, and I was wondering if I could get you to help out with it. Thomas Michael William Patrick Sales 16:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Knowledge networking
Thanks for the fix, I had just about realised the mistake I made, but your intervention is appreciated. --SnowdedTALK 19:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Immediate Care Wichita
A request for a normal 5 day deletion process is not Vandalism.--MDnews2u (talk) 20:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
I think Mr Carson is almost ready for the GAN treatment, now that the peer review has been archived and the comments all appear to have been dealt with. Just a couple of things first:
I've created a stats table at the top of my sandbox - could you let me know what you think? I'm wondering whether to trim it down by removing the two Liverpool rows where he was out on season loans and/or remove the "goals" colums as he's unlikely ever to score any. If you think the stats table is OK, I'll add it to the article.
I've changed his birthplace back to Whitehaven, per the numerous sources I've listed on the article's talk page (another user had changed it to Cleator Moor). However, one of the references I used regarding his family life does say he was born in Cleator Moor. My view is that even reliable sources can sometimes make mistakes, so I don't think it invalidates the other info in the source, but I'm wondering whether to add a footnote pointing out the discrepancy or whether not to draw attention to it. Any input welcome. --Jameboy (talk) 16:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
I've now added the stats in to the article. I'll put it up for GAN this week unless you can spot any further tweaks that need making. Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 23:38, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
I've delayed the GAN slightly as I've made some further edits after spotting a few more bits and pieces that I thought needed doing. Do you want to check the recent changes I've made and let me know if you think it's OK? I will then nominate it if all looks OK. --Jameboy (talk) 23:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
You are spot on. I always take it as read that people know that the fee goes to the selling club, however someone who didn't know anything about sport may well think that the player gets the fee if the wording isn't clear. I've now nominated it for GA. On another note, I noticed you are an admin. I wondered if you could take a look at the following and let me know if I'm doing the right thing - basically I'm trying to stop an edit war, ironically on the article Editors:
It's a bit tricky as the IP user has a different IP address each time, but I'd appreciate any advice. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 21:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Please ignore the above, I'm no longer interested in the Editors article. Anyway, Scott Carson is up for GAN now, (Talk:Scott Carson/GA1) and a question has been raised about page numbers in printed sources. Would you be able to answer that one as I think you added the printed sources? I'm off on wikibreak until Sunday but I'll check back then and see if there's anything more outstanding. Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 21:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Carson is now a Good Article, so a successful collaboration all round. If you are able to add the page numbers, all the better. Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 00:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
I've been working on 1923 FA Cup Final this week. I don't suppose by any chance you own the book The Lads of '23: Bolton Wanderers, West Ham United and the 1923 FA Cup Final by Brian Belton......?
An article that you have been involved in editing, Roy Assaf, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Assaf. Thank you. Eastmain (talk) 23:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
If you could reply on my talk page, that would be appreciated so I don't have to watch yours. Thanks in advance for any help. - Jmabel | Talk 23:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 4085 last month to 4284 on October 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 29 out of a total number of 1708 articles. In the area of GAs, at 24, WP:YORKS also falls behind WP:GM with 30.
As mentioned in the October newsletter, Wikipedia DVD Version 0.7, which aims to be a collection of around 30,000 articles taken from the English version of Wikipedia needed work to prepare 43 of the project's articles for the DVD.
The process of producing the list of articles for the DVD is now completed and thanks are due to the many members who made a contribution to the effort. The list of selected Yorkshire articles can be seen here.
The selection was done using a scoring system depending on the project's assessment, the number of incoming links to the article, the number of interwiki links the article had and the number of times the article had been viewed.
Only two of our top priority articles were not selected, Ripon and Wakefield, the others were cleaned up, improved, expanded and copyedited as far as time allowed.
There has again been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date.
The football and rugby editors have continued keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.
WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.
A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.
Priority Articles
The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members
Missing co-ordinates
A recent entry on the project talk page Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire#Missing coordinates alerted us to the fact that many of our articles do not display any geographical co-ordinates. Many also do not have infoboxes. As locational infoboxes usually have a field for co-ordinates, it was suggested that members might be able to kill two birds with one stone by adding an appropriate infobox at the same time as co-ordinates.
The infobox page usually includes detailed instructions for its use and many of the fields are not mandatory so are not displayed until information is entered.
The geographical co-ordinates for a location can be found on Google Earth.
Open Google Earth and enter the name of the location in the search box. (Quite often the article name can be copied and pasted directly into the search box but sometimes it is useful to add ,UK to the address.)
A results list is displayed beneath the search box.
Click on the right one.
Zoom in to check that the correct feature is being displayed on the image. (Sometimes the supposed feature is not at the centre of the page.)
Place the pointer over the location on the screen image and read the geographical co-ordinates from the panel at the bottom of the screen.
Make a note of the co-ordinates.
Open the tab of the article you are editing and add the co-ordinates in the co-ords field.
Once co-ordinates have been added the template {{coord missing}} should be removed from the article.
Please remember...
The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitor Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Infoboxes Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.
The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.
References Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:07, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 4284 last month to 4532 on November 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 29 out of a total number of 1746 articles. In the area of GAs, at 24, WP:YORKS also falls behind WP:GM with 31.
As mentioned in the October newsletter, Wikipedia DVD Version 0.7, which aims to be a collection of around 30,000 articles taken from the English version of Wikipedia needed work to prepare 43 of the project's articles for the DVD.
The process of producing the list of articles for the DVD is now completed and thanks are due to the many members who made a contribution to the effort. The list of selected Yorkshire articles can be seen here.
The selection was done using a scoring system depending on the project's assessment, the number of incoming links to the article, the number of interwiki links the article had and the number of times the article had been viewed.
Since the last newsletter Northallerton has also been selected to go onto the DVD having recently achieved GA status.
Thanks
Thanks for all those who have been adding co-ordinate information to articles as a result of last month's newsletter. The major impact has been on the railway station articles, including disused ones, but other location articles have also been tackled. This effort means that the articles can be accessed directly from external sources such as Google maps and gives them a much higher profile.
There has again been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date.
The football and rugby editors have continued keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.
WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.
A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.
Priority Articles
The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members
Co-ordinates
Just to let you know that a bot is currently sub-dividing the articles with missing co-ordinate data into sub-categories for ease of use. You can now find the articles by looking at the categories for each area as — East, North, South and West. From the discussions it looks like only the co-ordinates in the title area are being used by external sites so articles with multiple co-ordinates are not being handled correctly as yet.
Happy Christmas
Just to say thanks for all the effort put in by members on articles covering the Yorkshire area and to wish everyone a happy Christmas. It is time to take a break and to spend some time with family and friends. May be even to indulge yourself in the food and drink that abounds at this time of year or even make that occasional visit to a church. What ever you do over the festive season enjoy it and see you next year.
Though if you are at a loose end then many of you will be getting some new toys to play with which can be used to enhance wiki articles. Those new digital cameras can be used to get photographs for some of the articles which are currently without and for which the Geograph site has nothing suitable. May be it is a new PC that you just need to play with then spend some time checking out the watchlist for vandalism which tends to go unnoticed when there are fewer regular editors around. It may even be a book which can be used to add references to an article. May be you want to do something different then try creating spoken articles see the Spoken article project.
The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitor Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Infoboxes Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.
The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.
References Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
You probably knew this, but --for the record--I didn't agree that the article met speedy deletion criteria; I was simply restoring it since the original author (inappropriately) removed the notice. I would appreciate it if you would chime in (in support or against) at the AfD page: [8]. Thanks! --smurdah (talk) 22:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you- Russian Sculptures page rescued
I hope this is the right way to send this thanks? Please send me a message, if not!
Thank you for rescuing the page I started about the Russian sculptures. I knew that my layout for the page was abysmal, and ordinarily I wouldn't inflict such an "under construction" page upon the web, at Wikipedia or elsewhere, but I thought the sculptures good enough to take the chance, hoping all along that someone like you would come to the page's resuce. Also, as I infer you, at least, agreed, I did try to do the legwork of gathering the materials from which your GOOD Wikipedia page could be created. Poor as my page was, at least it DID (I hope) have useful, Wikipedia-valid, content. If only the negative "Flag for deletion" artist had taken your more positive approach to the page's problems! But of course, the "garden" must stay "weeded", and no one has time to re-work every poor page!!
Thanks again, not just for saving my efforts from the bin, but for adding another brick to the Wikipedia edifice.
Going back to my "hope this is right way...". I did look at the talk page guidelines, and inferred that talk pages are for talking about an "article"... I'm guessing that we each have a "personal" talk page, for "articles" about us?, which is for messages like this, and that I've put this on your "talk to Malcolm" page??
P.S.: The heading fro this item is coming up in red on my screen at the moment. If you have time to tell me if I did something wrong, good, if not, I'll assume it is just some "recent edit" or "by me" flagging mechanism.
P.P.S. If it was you, thank you also for improving the translations of the names of the individual sculptures from the fractured English present on the images over at wikicommons. --Tkbwik (talk) 13:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Michael Paton
Could you unprotect the Michael Paton page please? He made his first team debut for Aberdeen F.C. recently so now passes WP:ATHLETE. Thanks Ck12 (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind...
I made a minor fix to your comment here in which you referred to me as D.C.M. instead of D.M.N. Just thought I better let you know. =) D.M.N. (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 4532 last month to 4822 on December 19th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 29 out of a total number of 1763 articles. In the area of GAs, at 25, WP:YORKS also falls behind WP:GM with 36.
Thanks for all those who have been adding co-ordinate information to articles as a result of last month's newsletter. The major impact has been on the railway station articles, including disused ones, but other location articles have also been tackled. This effort means that the articles can be accessed directly from external sources such as Google maps and gives them a much higher profile.
There has again been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date.
The football and rugby editors have continued keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.
WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.
A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.
Priority Articles
The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members
Citations
Citations are a necessity to give credence to the articles that we produce, so that the facts given can be verified. One of the templates that is used for this is {{Cite book}} to give details of books used for creating the articles. There has been some changes to the template that we should be aware of and make changes accordingly when editing articles. The id= field should no longer be used to give the ISBN number for a book instead use the isbn= parameter. The page= and pages= parameters now have the p. or pp. automatically inserted and so we should just put the page number in the fields. Use page= for a single page and pages= for multiple pages. If the insertion of p. or pp. is not required then use nopp=true to suppress this. Note that the number of pages in a book is not specified using these fields and at the moment a new parameter is being discussed to cover this.
Happy New Year
Hope everyone enjoyed the festive season and are not feeling too worse for ware. At the start of a new year we all look back at what has happened in the last year and look forward to the coming year. It is time to take stock of what has happened in the last year well we have managed to get some priority articles selected and to get this newsletter in place to keep members up to date on what is happening. Articles have been tagged and assessed, a watchlist of these has been set up for members to keep track of changes to those articles that the project is interested in. So over all great steps have been made in the last year and thanks to everyone for the efforts put in. Looking forward it is time to make some targets for the coming year. If anyone has any ideas for what we should be doing in the coming year then please share them on the project talk page.
The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitor Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Infoboxes Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.
The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.
References Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Hi. I noticed that your edits have effectively merged the filmographies of this individual and this individual, but do any of the sources explicitly make this connection? I know that Helene Reynolds used the name "Helene Whitney" during her career, but is there any direct evidence that she was that Helene Whitney? Normally I'd just check myself, but I can't view most of the sources. I ask because the person who originally created the Helene Whitney article that I had prodded (with the 1905 birth date and the less impressive resume) also created a Helene Reynolds article that was similar to the article in its current state, except lacking the information that was correlated to Whitney because they believed the two people to be different individuals. It would be nice if one of the sources said something along the line of "Reynolds appeared in the film "The Hunchback of Notre Dame" in 1939 as Helene Whitney"! Cheers, CP 17:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Whoops... I hadn't seen that! Thanks for the clarification; I believe now that she more than meets the requirements of WP:N, so the deprodding was very appropriate. Cheers, CP 19:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Happy New Year to you too. Yeah, there were a few minor issues with missing page numbers in the Scott Carson article, and I wasn't able to fix these due to not having access to the sources. However, the reviewer did not consider these significant enough not to pass the article for GA. --Jameboy (talk) 12:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1923
Happy New Year to yourself too. I was just curious as to whether there was anything in the book that would be a useful addition to 1923 FA Cup Final that isn't already covered.........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Your edits to my talk page
WikiThanks
Thanks for deleting the ridiculous personal attack warning template that was placed on my talk page by User :Ego-defence-mechanic. It was very nice of you to bother with it. sassf (talk) 22:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, can you tell I don't do these often? --fvw* 22:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
RE: The Night (Disturbed song)
Thank you for the action of re-directing and blocking the "The Night" pages. Tons of new users and IPs alike have been constantly re-creating the article over the past few months, without any notability noted. I could only re-direct the page again, myself not being an administrator, but it would always end up being re-created anyways. So thank you for blocking it, and I will inform you should the song be released (it is still just a rumor that it'll ever meet notability guidelines). --TheGuycomplainedits 02:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Malcolmxl5. I see that you redirected and protected two of the pages about this song, but I was wondering if you knew that there was a third page, one which I just redirected myself. The name of the page is The Night (Disturbed Song), with a capital "S". If you want to protect that, you're more than welcome to. It may help to avoid the recreation of the article for now. All of these pages about the song should remain redirects until the song is released and meets the criteria for notability of songs. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and the song hasn't been released yet. Good day.--Almax999 22:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Malcolmxl5. The speedy had already been declined on the basis that new references had been added, suggesting that the subject might meet the general notability guideline. In my view too it did not qualify as a speedy. Paul Erik(talk)(contribs) 22:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for undeleting. Based on your comments it's not entirely clear to me that you read the Talk page before you deleted it. Paul Erik(talk)(contribs) 23:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Actually, I think there is some confusion on my part about why the previous speedy was declined but you contested my deletion and I restored it on that basis so we are where we ought to be, I think. Kind regards. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
We are where we ought to be, yes. Thanks again and best regards, Paul Erik(talk)(contribs) 23:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
No problem. Have a good weekend. :) --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
If you are going to attempt to calm down this constant recreation by redirecting instead of deleting, could you protect the redirect until January 19th? That's the earliest possible date of charting, and it's the day that the salt on My Life Would Suck Without You (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) expires.—Kww(talk) 02:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Michael J Scanlon
There can be no outside sources if no sources allow articles to be written about this kid. Its a revolving door. Open this door and the rest will handle itself. This kid is extremely important in the rugby circle in the US. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelJScanlon (talk • contribs) 15:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Replied
Hello, Malcolmxl5. You have new messages at K50 Dude's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your "hoax" tag and a later PROD got taken off by an IP; I have taken it to AfD here. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello..
I don't actually use wikipedia, I signed up to ask you (Malcolmxl5) a question...
You deleted an article about "Phoebe Hurst" and I wondered if you could tell me who wrote it, because I have no idea it was there until today!!! - it was about me. If i've written this message wrong or put it in the wrong place, I apologize, cuz I have no idea how to use it!
Thanks so much!
PhoebeV (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
This was a clear cock-up by the creator, who created the archive in two namespaces, and jumped the gun a bit in removing the PROD.
Given that it is a useless duplicate in the wrong namespace, G6 seems fair enough! Mayalld (talk) 22:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Ah, Ok you did boob, cos you deleted both versions!
The version in article space needs to go!! Mayalld (talk) 22:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Heh, I realised that I boobed! That what happens when you're tired and I decided it was best to revert myself, go to bed and let someone else deal with it. It seemed to be a blatantly obvious piece of housekeeping to me and it could be dealt with as a CSD G6. Has it been sorted now? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Final version
As a contributor to the discussion regarding sports team logos, I am soliciting feedback as to the latest version of that guideline. Your support/opposition/feedback would be appreciated. — BQZip01 —talk 21:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 4822 last month to 5108 on January 30th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 31 out of a total number of 1798 articles. In the area of GAs, at 26, WP:YORKS also falls behind WP:GM with 41.
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members
Article Activity Monitoring
Article activity is now been recorded at Wikipedia:WikiProject Yorkshire/Article alerts by the bot ArticleAlertbot. This gives details of the changes that have taken place in the last 14 days in the status of articles tagged for the project. The status changes being monitored are :-
Proposed deletion
Articles for deletion
Miscellany for deletion
Templates for deletion
Categories for deletion
Good article nominations
Good article reassessment
Good topic candidates
Featured article candidates
Featured article reviews
Featured list candidates
Featured list removal candidates
Featured topic candidates
Peer review
Requests for comments
Requested moves
Did you know
The project is now subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitor Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Infoboxes Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.
The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.
References Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
.png)
