User talk:Mal Rob1

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 01:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Janet Jackson. Thank you. 73.96.115.117 (talk) 01:29, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Blac Chyna. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Blac Chyna. Given that there are references that refute your changes must assume deliberate Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 22:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Acronym punctuation[edit]

Please be aware that Wikipedia has a style manual that governs issues like punctuation of acronyms. MOS:ACRO provides that, for uniformity across Wikipedia, time-related acronyms don't have abbreviation points. For example, Central Standard Time isn't "C.S.T.", it's "CST". Times of day are either "am" or "pm", not "a.m." or "p.m.". (If you are reading this and thinking, "Those commas should be inside the quotation marks," please see MOS:LQ; while I personally agree with you, Wikipedia has a uniform "logical quotation" style that dictates otherwise.) Thanks for looking at these manual sections so others don't have to correct any more well-intentioned "corrections." - Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:32, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — ξ ^xplicit 02:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]