User talk:Magnificentry

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Magnificentry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 09:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Your recent editing history at World War II shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nick-D (talk) 22:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, in the WW2 page I added some description about how Blitzkrieg works and it was immediately deleted. So, I did it again. Same thing. I do not understand why. Magnificentry (talk) 14:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

His name is Slatersteven or something. Magnificentry (talk) 14:06, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read wp:editwar note that being right (or come to that being undone by me) are valid reasons. Slatersteven (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What valid reasons? You just griefed my work and said "ewwwww" Magnificentry (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that your excuses do not justify edit warring. And Ew is a typo, as I would have thought the context would have told you "ew mention it about 10 words before". Slatersteven (talk) 11:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do something?? Magnificentry (talk) 21:52, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EasyTech moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, EasyTech, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 23:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

because it is so obscure it's kind of hard to find reliable independant information. sorry about that. Magnificentry (talk) 20:37, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:EasyTech[edit]

Hello, Magnificentry. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EasyTech, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:EasyTech[edit]

Hello, Magnificentry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "EasyTech".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! GamerPro64 13:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Airrack[edit]

Hey there, I saw the edits on Airrack. I deleted it due to the fact that it is unsourced (even though I saw the video). I would recommend saying that he was allegedly exposed. I deleted it on behalf of WP:PROVEIT as there was no source, and the article is about a living person. 48JcL48 (talk) 22:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted it again as you did not add a source. 48JcL48 (talk) (contribs) 15:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean I did not add a source? Magnificentry (talk) 01:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Airrack&oldid=1217993538 I don’t see no source 48JcL48 (talk) (contribs) 01:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]